Improving the Methodological Support of Environmental Forensics
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-2-70-74
Abstract
The article addresses methodical support of forensic environmental research and national standards of the Russian Federation (GOSTs), which are also used for methodological purposes.
The author demonstrates that in studies of the ecological condition of environmental objects to determine the cost of their restoration, the approaches presented in the federal assessment standards are used as methodological materials. She also proposes the directions for further improvement of methodical support of environmental forensics.
About the Author
N. V. MikhalevaRussian Federation
Candidate of Law, Head of the Education and Methodology Department
Moscow 109028, Russia
References
1. Smirnova S.A., Usov A.I. Enhancing the Scientific Validity of Methodological Support in Forensic Science: An Important International Trend. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 11–17. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-2-11-17
2. Grishin A.I. Problematic Issues of the Appointment and Production of the Forensic Environmental Examinations in Criminal Proceedings. Legal Institutions and Methods of the Environmental Protection in Russia, CIS Countries, and the European Union: Legislation and Environmental Efficiency. Saratov: Saratovskii istochnik, 2018. P. 57–59. (In Russ.).
3. Kitaeva V.N., Shilkina A.S. Topical Issue Forensic-Ecological Expertise in Russia. Statute and Law. 2019. No. 7. P. 178–180. (In Russ.).
4. Aubakirova Zh.B., Zhakisheva D.K. Issues and Development Prospects of Environmental Forensics. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “East-West: Partnership in Forensic Expertise. Topical Issues of the Theory and Practice of Forensic Science” (Almaty, November 6, 2014). Astana, 2014. (In Russ.).
5. Mikhaleva N.V. Methods and Methodical Support of Environmental Forensics. Materials of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference “Debatable Issues of the Theory and Practice of Forensic Expertise”, Dedicated to the Memory of Professor T.V. Averyanova (Moscow, March 25–26, 2021). Moscow: RGUP, 2021. P. 432–436. (In Russ.).
6. Omelyanyuk G.G., Mikhaleva N.V. The Forensic Ecological Examination. In: Smirnova S.A. (Ed.). Multimodal Edition “Forensic Science. Reboot”. Part 2. Dictionary of Forensic Science. Moscow: Ekom, 2012. P. 411–412. (In Russ.).
7. Omel’yanyuk G.G., Goncharuk N.Yu., Korol’ S.G., Bebeshko G.I., Zhandareva M.V. Methodical Guidelines on Forensic Environmental Examination of Water Bodies. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2009. No. 2 (14). P. 86–105. (In Russ.).
8. Omel’yanyuk G.G., Goncharuk N.Yu., Korol’ S.G., Gulevskaya V.V., Nikiforov V.L. Methodical Guidelines on Forensic Environmental Examination of Soil and Geological Objects. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2009. No. 3 (15). P. 88–115. (In Russ.).
9. Bebeshko G.I., Omel’yanyuk G.G., Nikulina M.V., Valitova A.R. Experimental Validation of a Methodology for Determining Soil pH and Specific Electrical Conductance in Samples of Geological and Soil Evidence in Forensic Environmental Investigations in the Absence of Standard Samples. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 66–74. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-2-66-74
10. Maiorova E.I. The Forensic Ecological Examination of City Biocenosis (Case Study of Moscow). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2009. No. 2 (14). P. 15–24. (In Russ.).
11. Maiorova E.I. Some Discussion Issues in Environmental Forensics. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 112–118. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-2-112-118
12. Selivanov A.A., Zubova M.A. The Course of Lectures on the Expert Specialty 19.2 “Examination of Food Commodities in Order to Assess Them”. Handbook for Forensic Experts. Moscow: RFCFS, 2020. 122 p. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/978-5-91133-199-3-2020-2
13. Maiorova E.I. Environmental Forensics. Study Guide. Мoscow: INFRA-М, 2020. 197 p. (In Russ.).
14. Butyrin A.Yu., Stativa E.B., Mikhaleva N.V. Tasks of Comprehesvie Forensic Environmental and Construction Examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2022. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 16–26. https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-1-16-26
15. Petrukhina O.A. Environmental Forensics: Perspectives of Development and Organizational Issues. Materials of the Annual International Scientific and Practical Conference “Criminalistics and Forensic Science: Past, Present and Outlook for the Future” (Saint Petersburg, June 1–2, 2017). Saint Petersburg: SanktPeterburgskii universitet MVD Rossii, 2017. P. 253–258. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Mikhaleva N.V. Improving the Methodological Support of Environmental Forensics. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2022;17(2):70-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-2-70-74