Problems of Taxonomic Identification of Unique Objects of Animal Origin by Mitochondrial DNA Markers for the Purposes of Forensic Examination

   Direct identification in forensic molecular genetic examination is a direct comparison of identifying characteristics, such as DNA profiles of the identification object, with identifying characteristics of the objects of comparison, including those obtained from the database. At the same time, the identification of objects of animal origin is carried out by comparing the sequencing results: base sequences of the target DNA fragment with various DNA nucleotide sequences stored in international databases.

   The purpose of this work was to establish the species identity of a sample of animal origin – the “Freeze-dried Shark” pet food.

   Despite the fact that this study was conducted outside the framework of forensic molecular genetic examination, its results illustrate possible methodological problems associated with establishing the taxonomic affiliation of rare objects of animal origin by molecular genetic methods. The authors of the article show that the study of unknown objects of animal origin using DNA analysis under forensic examination will require the development and application of unique private expert techniques in some cases. They also demonstrate the feasibility of creating a unified national database of genetic information in Russia with special control requirements.

1. Serite C.P., Ntshudisane O.K., Swart E. et al. Limitations of DNA Barcoding in Determining the Origin of Smuggled Seahorses and Pipefishes. Forensic Science International: Animals and Environments. 2021. Vol. 1. 100006. doi: 10.1101/2020.12.09.417998

2. Shekhovtsov S.V., Shekhovtsova I.N., Peltek S.E. DNA Barcoding: Methods and Approaches. Uspehi sovremennoj biologii. 2019. Vol. 139. No. 3. P. 211–220. (In Russ.). doi: 10.1134/S0042132419030074

3. Hebert P.D.N., Cywinska A., Ball Sh.L. et al. Biological Identifications through DNA Barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 2003. Vol. 270. No. 1512. P. 313–321. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218

4. Kolesnikov A.A., Gerasimov E.S. The Multiplicity of the Mitochondrial Genome Structure Variants. Advances in biological chemistry. 2012. Vol. 52. P. 37–62. (In Russ.).

5. Kultin A.Yu., Storozhenko I.V., Pimenov I.G. et al Forensic Examination of Mitochondrial DNA of Human Biological Traces. Methodological Recommendations. Moscow: EKTs MVD Rossii, 2008. 80 p. (In Russ.).

6. Shneer V.S. DNA Barcoding of Animal and Plant Species as a Way of Their Molecular Identification and Biodiversity Study. Biology Bulletin Reviews. 2009. Vol. 70. No. 4. P. 296–315. (In Russ.).

7. Kress W., Erickson D. DNA Barcodes. Methods and Protocols. Vol. 858. Washington, DC: Humana Press: Totowa, 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-591-6_1

8. Rodrigues C.R., de Carvalho D.E.V., Garcia Y. et al. DNA Barcode as an Effective Tool in the Identification of Billfishes (Scombroidei, Teleostei) from Exported Specimens. Forensic Science International: Animals and Environments. 2021. Vol. 1. P. 100028. doi: 10.1016/j.fsiae.2021.100028

9. Fundamentals of Forensic Expertology: Educational and Methodological Guide. Moscow: RFCFS, 2023. 384 p. (In Russ.).

10. Lijtmaer D.A., Kerr K.C.R., Stoeckle M.Y. et al. DNA Barcoding Birds: from Field Collection to Data Analysis. In: Kress W., Erickson D. (ed.). DNA Barcodes. Washington, DC: Humana Press, Totowa, 2012. Vol. 858. P. 127–152.

11. Staats M., Arulandhu A.J., Gravendeel B. et al. Advances in DNA Metabarcoding for Food and Wildlife Forensic Species Identification. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016. Vol. 408. No. 17. P. 4615–4630. doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-9595-8

12. Straube N., White W., Ho C.-H. et al. A DNA Sequence-Based Identification Checklist for Taiwanese Chondrichthyans. Zootaxa. 2013. Vol. 3752. No. 1. P. 256–278. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3752.1.16

13. Nittinger F., Haring E., Pinsker W. et al. Out of Africa? Phylogenetic relationships between Falco Biarmicus and the Other Hierofalcons (Aves: Falconidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research. 2005. Vol. 43. No. 4. P. 321–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2005.00326.x

14. Nittinger F., Gamauf A., Pinsker W. et al. Phylogeography and Population Structure of the Saker Falcon (Falco Cherrug) and the Influence of Hybridization: Mitochondrial and Microsatellite Data. Molecular Ecology. 2007. No. 7. P. 1497–1517. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03245.x

15. Sloan D.B., Havird J.C., Sharbrough J. The On-Again, Off-Again Relationship between Mitochondrial Genomes and Species Boundaries. Molecular Ecology. 2017. Vol. 26. No. 8. P. 2212–2236. doi: 10.1111/mec.13959

16. White W.T., Last P.R., Naylor G.J.P., 2010. Scoliodon Macrorhynchos (Bleeker, 1852), a Second Species of Spadenose Shark from the Western Pacific (Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae). Descriptions of New Sharks and Rays from Borneo. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Paper. 2010. Vol. 32. P. 61–76.