Special Knowledge in the Field of Occupational Health and Safety and Industrial Safety in Relation to Law Enforcement
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2025-3-14-24
Abstract
The article analyzes the need of the law enforcer in special knowledge in the fields of occupational safety and health and industrial safety as well as the implementation of this law enforcement requirement by forensic institutions of the Russian Ministy of Justice in the form of a new kind of forensic examination – occupational safety and health examination.
About the Author
P. E. Pen’kovskii
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science named after professor A.R. Shlyakhov of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation;
The All-Russian State University of Justice
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pen’kovskii Pavel Eduardovich – State Expert, Department of Fire-Technical and Explosives Examination; Postgraduate Student of the Department of Forensic Expertology
Moscow 101000
Moscow 117638
References
1. Bezrukov Yu.I., Puchkov O.A. The Use of Special Knowledge in the Law: Theory and Practice Issues. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Edu‑ cation. 2018. No. 61-4. P . 27–32. (In Russ.).
2. Varshavskii A.E., Kochetkova E.V. A Problem of Engineering Workforce Shortage. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. 2015. No. 32 (431). P . 2–16. (In Russ.).
3. Alekseev A.I., Artamonov A.A., Axmetshin Kh.M., Bashkatov L.N., Belova G.D. et al. Rus‑ sian Criminological Encyclopedia. A.I. Dolgova (ed.). Мoscow: Norma, 2000. 808 p. (In Russ.).
4. Gavrilov B.Ya. On the Application of Information Technology in Registration, Accounting and Resolution of Statements and Reports of Crime. Criminalistics, Criminal Proceedings and Forensic Expertology in the Twenty-first Century: Vectors of Development (for the 70th Anniversary of the Department of Management of Crime Investigation Agencies of the Academy of Management of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs): Collection of Scientific Ar‑ ticles on the Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Moscow, April 25, 2025). Moscow: Academy of Management of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs, 2025. P . 49–56. (In Russ.).
5. Krivchenko Yu.A., Omelyanyuk G.G., Bordyugov L.G., Marchenko I.N., Bordyugov G.B. Me‑ thodical Recommendations on Commissioning and Conduct of Forensic Occupational Safety and Health Examination. Samara: Samarama, 2024. 128 p. (In Russ.).
6. Taubkin I.S. On the Special Conceptual Framework for the Fire Forensics. Theory and Prac‑ tice of Forensic Science. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 3. P . 76–88. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-3-76-88
7. Butyrin A.Yu., Orlov Yu.K. Construction and Technical Examination in Modern Legal Pro‑ ceedings: Textbook. Moscow: RFCFS, 2011. 368 p. (In Russ.).
8. Danilova N.A., Grigor'eva M.A. Appropriate Correspondence with the Needs of Enforcement Practice: Myth or Reality. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019. No. 10 (107). P . 134–141. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.107.10.134-141
9. Butyrin A.Yu. Forensic Construction and Tech‑ nical Examination in the Investigation of Acci‑ dents and Emergencies: Monograph. Moscow: RFCFS, 2003. 320 p. (In Russ.).
10. Usov A.I., Karpukhina E.S., Kuznetsov V.O. Some Aspects of Applying a Systematic Approach to the Study of the Objects of Forensic Examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2022. Vol. 17. No. 2. P . 6–17. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-2-6-17
11. Fiorentini L., Marmo L. Principles of Forensic Engineering Applied to Industrial Accidents. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2019. 489 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118962800
12. Borodin V.V., Sirakanyan A.R. Grounds for the Appointment of Expertise in Cases of Crimes Related to Violation of Labor Protection and Safety Regulations. Sociology and Law. 2020. No. 3. P . 58–64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2020-3-58-64
13. Taubkin I.S. Forensic Examination of Techno‑ genic Explosions. Organizational, Methodical and Legal Framework. Мoscow: Yurlitinform, 2009. 592 p. (In Russ.).
14. Rikhterman V.Ya., Rodionov V.I. Evidential Significance of Forensic Examination in Arbitration Proceedings. Legal Aspects of the Expert’s Opinion Evaluation and Possibility of Its Critical Perception. Law. 2019. No. 10. P . 63–72. (In Russ.).
15. Forensic Examination: Typical Errors. E.R. Rossinskaya (ed.). Moscow: Prospekt, 2012. 544 p. (In Russ.).
16. Hmyz A.I. To a Question About Expert Prevention in the Production of Judicial Expertise. Bul‑ letin of Moscow University of the Russian Minis‑ try of Internal Affairs. 2019. No. 1. P . 105–108. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2073-0454-2019-10027
17. Sutton I. Process Risk and Reliability Manage‑ ment. Operational Integrity Management. Burlington: Elsevier Science & Technology Books; William Andrew, 2010. 856 p.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Pen’kovskii P.E. Special Knowledge in the Field of Occupational Health and Safety and Industrial Safety in Relation to Law Enforcement. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2025;20(3):14-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2025-3-14-24
Views:
285
Email this article 