Systematic Approach to Construction Project Study as an Object of Forensic Examination
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2025-3-85-92
Abstract
The article discusses some methodological aspects of a systematic approach to the results of construction design study in the process of forensic examination.
The author describes the problem and points out the determinacy of the system reflecting the object of forensic examination, provides the description of relevant properties of the project (as an object of reality) subject to accounting, systematization and formalization under system analysis. The conditions of formalization, criteria and definitions of basic concepts corresponding to the solved expert task are proposed.
Methods of quality level assessment of the project documentation through the integral feature “project readiness” and a way to study the causal relationships of the project with the external environment, properties of buildings and structures causes.
The article is recommended to scientists, experts and specialists working in the field of forensic construction and technical examination.
About the Author
S. A. Zamyatin
Non-Governmental Forensic Examination of the Novosibirsk Region
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zamyatin Sergei Aleksandrovich – Forensic Expert, Director, Presidium Member of Interregional Public Organization for Development of Expert and Forensic activities “MOES”
Novosibirsk 630003
References
1. Genisaretsky O.I. “Artificial” and “Natural” Systems. Center for Humanitarian Technologies. 29.11.2006. (In Russ.). https://gtmarket.ru/library/articles/1923
2. Usov A.I., Karpukhina E.S., Kuznetsov V.O. Some Aspects of Applying a Systematic Approach to the Study of the Objects of Forensic Examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2022. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 6–17. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-2-6-17
3. Bertalanfi L. General Theory of Systems. Critical Review. Studies on General Theory of Systems. Moscow: Progress, 1969. 520 p. (In Russ.).
4. Bogdanov A.A. Tectology. Universal Science of Organization, in 2 vol. Moscow: Ekonomika, 1989. (In Russ.).
5. Verigin A. N., Nezamaev N. A., Koroleva L. A. The Development of General Systems Theory // EV. 2017. No. 3 (10). P. 4–10. (In Russ.).
6. Aminev F.G., Arutyunov A.S. On the Issue of the Relationship of Expert and Forensics and Forensic Expert Activities. Forensic Examination. 2023. No. 4 (76). P. 36–46. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25724/VAMVD.A175
7. Belkin R.S. Course of Criminalistics. Textbook for Universities in 3 vol. Moscow: Yurist’, 1997. 464 p. (In Russ.).
8. Lapko A.V., Lapko V.A., Bahtina A.V., Avdeenok V.L., Tubolcev V.P. Synthesis and Analysis of Statistical Model of the Dynamics of Times Systems with Discrete Control under Conditions of Apriori Uncertainty. Informatics and Control Sys‑ tems. 2021. No. 2 (68) P. 56–70. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22250/isu.2021.68.56-70
9. Voloshchuk S.D. Krakhin A.V., Sednev M.Yu. Forensic Construction and Technical Examina‑ tion of Determining Scope and Cost of Actually Completed Design and Survey Work / S.D. Voloshchuk (ed.). Moscow: ASV, 2014. 175 p. (In Russ.).
10. Forensic Examination: Typical Errors / E.R. Rossinskaya (ed.). Moscow: Prospekt, 2018, 544 p. (In Russ.).
11. Ignatiev M.E. The Principle of Causality as an Applied Rule of Establishing Causal and Effect Relationship in Crime Investigation. Bulletin of Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. 2018. No. 2 (40). P. 30–34. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Zamyatin S.A. Systematic Approach to Construction Project Study as an Object of Forensic Examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2025;20(3):85-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2025-3-85-92
Views:
31
Email this article 