Current Problems of the Forensic Analysis of Handwriting and Signatures Made with Modern Technical Means
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-2-31-35
Abstract
The author considers one of the topical issues of forensic handwriting examination and forensic technical examination of documents – analysis of handwriting objects made using modern technical means: plotter, 3D printer, robotic hand.
The author reviews the main publications on this topic, analyzes some methods for identifying such handwriting objects, systemizes the features helping to detect them. He also pays special attention to complex situations that occur in expert practice.
The given recommendations on the work with handwriting objects made with modern technical means, their comprehensive analysis by handwriting experts and expert technicians will contribute to improving the quality of training of experts in these specialties.
About the Author
N. A. Rybalkin
Tula Forensic Laboratory of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
State Forensic Expert of the Department of Research of Documents; Assistant of the Department of Forensic Examination and Customs Affairs of the Tula State University
Tula 300028, Russia
References
1. Belkin R.S, Samonchik A.N. (Eds.). Technical and Forensic Examination of Documents. Textbook for Universities of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR. Volgograd: VSSh MVD SSSR, 1978. 215 p. (In Russ.).
2. Vinberg L.A., Shvankova M.V. Handwriting Expertise. Textbook for Universities of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR. Volgograd: VSSh MVD SSSR, 1977. 207 p. (In Russ.).
3. Orlova V.F. (Ed.). Forensic Handwriting Examination. General Part. Theoretical and Methodological Framework. 2nd ed., revised and supplemented. Moscow: Nauka, 2006. 543 p. (In Russ.).
4. Seregin V.V. Handwriting and Handwriting Analysis. Course of Lectures. Volgograd: VA MVD Rossii, 2002. 228 p. (In Russ.).
5. Panova T.O., Milovidova O.Yu., Karpukhina E.S. A Comprehensive Study of Imitation of Handwritten Requisites (a Case from Expert Practice). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2008. No. 3 (11). P. 118–121. (In Russ.).
6. Belova E.N. The Development of Forensic Identification in Forensic Handwriting Examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2015. Vol. 39. No. 3. P. 172–175. (In Russ.).
7. Podkatilina M.L. The Problems of Appointment and Production the Judicial Handwriting Expertise. Courier of Moscow Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). 2015. No. 12. P. 116–121. (In Russ.).
8. Pronin V.N., Lesnikova P.G. The Study of the Signature in Order to Establish the Fact of Its Implementation with the Help of a Technical Device: A Plotter (A Case from Expert Practice). Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University. 2015. No. 4. P. 162–165. (In Russ.).
9. Shlykov D.A. Establishment of Facts of NonHandwriting Reproduction of Handwriting Objects: Current State and Development Prospects. Encyclopedia of Forensic Examination. 2016. No. 4 (11). (In Russ.). http://www.proexpertizu.ru/theory_and_practice/ted/756
10. Kruger D. The LongPenTM – The World’s First Original Remote Signing Device. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2010. Vol. 55. Issue 3. P. 795–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01348.x
11. Bondarenko P.V. Diagnostics of Forgery of Signatures Made with the Help of Computer Technologies. Information Security of Regions. 2009. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 67–72. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Rybalkin N.A. Current Problems of the Forensic Analysis of Handwriting and Signatures Made with Modern Technical Means. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2022;17(2):31-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-2-31-35
Views:
1143
Email this article 