The Efficiency of a Head’s of a Forensic Organization Activity: Assessment Criteria, Conditions for Achieving and Correlation with the Goals of Forensic Activity
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-2-37-45
Abstract
The article addresses the issues of the efficiency of forensic activity and its impact on the successful performance of forensic conduct. The author offers a systematic analysis of the processes of forming efficiency indicators for forensic activity and assessment criteria for a Head’s of a forensic organization activity. The paper also describes qualitative and quantitative indicators of the efficiency of a forensic organization when assessing the efficacy of a head’s performance, including by the efficiency indicators approved by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation for forensic institutions of the system of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. The author analyzes the probabilities of the negative efficiency of a head’s activity and its impact on expert conduct. The article determines the trends of the further research of the issues of improving the efficacy of forensic organizations’ activities by forming new criteria for assessing a forensic organization head’s performance influencing the quality of forensic conduct.
About the Author
O. A. Surovaya
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Surovaya Olesya Aleksandrovna – Candidate of Law, Junior Researcher in the Forensic Research Methodology Department in the system of forensic institutions of the Russian Ministry of Justice
Moscow 109028
References
1. Tereshchenko N.G. Performance of Manager’s Activity in Experts’ Opinions. Koncept. 2014. Vol. 20. P. 2076–2080. (In Russ.). http://e-koncept.ru/2014/54679.htm
2. Kapoguzov E.A., Suleimenova G.K. Performance Evaluation of Government Agencies in the Context of Strategic Management and Organizational Development in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Ars Administrandi. 2017. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 147–170. (In Russ.).
3. Shchukina T.V. International Standards and Internationsl Practice of Implementation of an Assessment In: Zhukovskaya N.Yu., Kalinina E.V. (eds). Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “International Law and the Modern World” (Lipetsk, March 25, 2016). [Lipetsk State Pedagogical University named after P. P. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky], 2016. P. 174–182. (In Russ.).
4. Bagryanskaya P.D. Efficiency of Civil Procedure: Comparative Study. Legislation. 2020. No. 11. P. 50–55. (In Russ.).
5. Andrews N. The Three Paths of Justice. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. Vol. 65. Springer, 2018. 344 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74832-0
6. Zhan Zh.-P., Gurbanov R.A. European Commission on the Efficiency of Justice. Organization. Work. Development. Moscow: YuNITI-DANA, 2015. 331 p. (In Russ.).
7. Viaam Kh. Assessment of the Reliability of an Expert Opinion as Evidence by Court Using the Daubert Standard. Materials of the 8th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Theory and Practice of Forensic Expertise in the Current Context” (Moscow, January 28–29, 2021). Moscow: RG-Press, 2021. P. 332–325. (In Russ.).
8. Rossinskaya E.R. Effectiveness of Forensic Expert Activity through the Prism of Judicial Expertology. Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2017. No. 2. P. 85–90. (In Russ.).
9. Demidova T.V., Bushuev V.V. The Effectiveness of Forensic Activities: Problems and Solutions. Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2017. No. 2. P. 43–45. (In Russ.).
10. Sandan S.V. Efficiency of a Manager’s Activity. The Young Scientist. 2015. No. 4 (84). P. 417– 421. (In Russ.).
11. Gavrilin E.V. On Key Management Performance Indicators and Risks of Poor Management of Enterprises and Economic Entities with State Participation. Economics. Taxes. Law. 2017. No. 6. P. 24–28. (In Russ.).
12. Khmelevskikh Yu.A., Maykova Yu.F. The Assessment of Efficiency of Staff of the State Civil Service of the Russian Federation. Administrative Consulting. 2017. No. 1 (5). P. 49–53. (In Russ.).
13. Neustroev S.S., Zibrov V.A. Assessment of the Efficiency of the Innovative Activity of the Head of the General Educational Organization. Scientific Notes of IME RAE. 2019. No. 1 (69). P. 10–13. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Surovaya O.A. The Efficiency of a Head’s of a Forensic Organization Activity: Assessment Criteria, Conditions for Achieving and Correlation with the Goals of Forensic Activity. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021;16(2):37-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-2-37-45
Views:
683
Email this article 