Expert Concepts in Forensic Ecology
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-1-124-129
Abstract
The article addresses the existing points of view on the term “the language of forensic expertise”. The author draws attention to the fact that many forensic expert terms comprise a synthesis of legal and scientific concepts. The legal concepts contained in Chapter 26 “Environmental crimes” of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and the definitions of some of them are analyzed. It is pointed out that a range of expert notions necessary for forensic purposes is defined by the GOST R 58081-2018 “Forensic environmental expertise. Terms and definitions”, including the concepts of “environmental harm”, “damage caused to an environmental object”. They should be gradually implemented into the practice of conducting forensic environmental investigations.
About the Author
N. V. Mikhaleva
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhaleva Natal’ya Valer’evna – Candidate of Law, Head of the Forensic Research Methodology Department in the System of Forensic Institutions of the Russian Ministry of Justice, Head of the Information and Publishing Department; Associate Professor at the Department of Forensic Examination Activities, Law Institute
Moscow 109028
Moscow 117198
References
1. Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I., Zinin A.M. The Theory of Forensic Science (Forensic Expertology) / E.R. Rossinskaya (ed). 2nd ed. Moscow: Norma: Infra-M, 2016. 368 p. (In Russ.)
2. Edzhubov L.G. The Language of Forensic Examination. In: Smirnova S.A. (ed). Multimodal Edition “Forensic Science. Reboot”. Part 2. Dictionary of Forensic Science. Moscow: Ekom, 2012. P. 434–439. (In Russ.)
3. Tolstukhina T.V., Svetlichny A.A., Panarina D.V. Terminological Problems of the Language of the Interdisciplinary Institute of Forensic Examination. Questions of Expert Practice. 2019. No. S1. P. 647–652. (In Russ.).
4. Vinberg A.I., Malakhovskaya N.T. Forensic Expertology. (General Theoretical and Methodological Problems of Forensic Examinations). Volgograd: VSSh MVD SSSR, 1979. 181 p. (In Russ.).
5. Kuznetsov V.O. On the Issue of Expert Terms in Forensic Linguistics. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 29– 41. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-1-29-41
6. Yumatov V.A., Nesterova O.A. The Language of Criminalistics and Forensic Examination. Current State and Development Prospects. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod. 2012. No. 1-1. P. 254–258. (In Russ.).
7. Radbil’ T.B., Yumatov V.A. The Language of Forensics: Formation and Development Trends. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod. 2014. No. 3-2. P. 185–190. (In Russ.)
8. Tolstukhina T.V., Svetlichny A.A., Panarina D.V. The Main Scientific Areas of Terminology of General Theory of Forensics. Izvestiya Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences. 2018. No. 4–2. P. 52–60. (In Russ.)
9. Krestovnikov O.A. Developing the Language of the General Theory of Forensic Science. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 24–27. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-4-24-27
10. Shlyakhov A.R. The Ways to Increase the Role of Forensic Science. Soviet State and Law. 1978. No. 3. P. 82–87. (In Russ.)
11. Petrukhina O.A. Forensic Ecology: Perspectives for Development and Organizational Issues. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Criminalistics and Forensic Science: Past, Present and Outlook to the Future” (St. Petersburg. June 1–2, 2017). St. Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskii universitet MVD Rossii., 2017. P. 253–258. (In Russ.)
12. Omel’yanyuk G.G., Mihkaleva N.V. Environmental Forensics. In: Smirnova S.A. (ed). Multimodal Edition “Forensic Science: Reboot”. Part 2. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Theory of Forensic Science. Moscow: Ekom, 2012. P. 411–412. (In Russ.)
13. Zhai W., Zhang N., Hua F. The Development of Forensic Science Standards in China. Forensic Science International: Synergy. 2020. Vol. 2. P. 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.001
14. Khomyakov E.G., Metelev A.V. On the State of Affairs and Problems of Terminology Standards in Forensic Examination. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Economics and Law. 2019. Vol. 29. No. 6. P. 904–910. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9593-2019-29-6-904-910
15. Mikhaleva N.V. Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of Forensic Evaluation of Environmental Compartments for the Purpose of Environmental Damage Assessment. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016. No. 2 (42). P. 75–79. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Mikhaleva N.V. Expert Concepts in Forensic Ecology. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021;16(1):124-129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-1-124-129
Views:
627
Email this article 