Dialogicality of the Extremism Discourse
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-4-27-31
Abstract
The article addresses the possibility of isolating extremism discourse as a specific kind of discourse. As criteria for such determination are proposed: a common subject, quantitative parameter (sufficient quantities of such texts), presence of a genre variety of texts of this discourse. The study material is the texts of the dialogue and monologue speech: correspondence on the Internet of interpersonal and public nature, articles. The linguistic analysis methods (lexical-semantic, stylistic, semantic, communicative-pragmatic analysis) were used to study the material. The main feature of extremism discourse is dialogicality, which is the relation of different semantic positions, consideration of the addressee’s position, consideration of the opponents, and implementation in the author’s dialogue. Forms of representation of dialogicality in texts and genres of the extremism discourse are considered. The study revealed the following features of the extremism discourse: significant roles of a addresser and addressee, the use of the strategies of self-presentation and discrimination by the communicants, the juxtaposition of “friends” and “strangers” groups, updating of the “friends” and “strangers” concepts.
About the Author
T. V. Berdnikova
The Russian Federal Centre of the Russian Federation Ministry of Justice
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Berdnikova Tat’yana Vladimirovna – Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor; Chief State Forensic Expert, the Russian Federal Centre of the Russian Federation Ministry of Justice
Moscow, 109028
References
1. Kozhina M.N. Dialogicality as a Category Feature of a Written Academic Text. Essays on the History of Scientific Style of the Literary Russian Language in XVIII–XX centuries. Vol. 2. The Style of a Scientific Text (Common Parameters). Part 2. The Categories of an Academic Text: Functional and Stylistic Aspect. Perm’: Perm university, 1998. P. 124–195. (In Russ.)
2. Prokhvatilova O.A. External Dialogicality of a Sounding Orthodox Sermon. The World of Orthodoxy. The Collection of Scientific Articles. Issue 2. Volgograd: VolGU, 1998. P. 97–108. (In Russ.)
3. Borisova I.N. A Russian Spoken Dialogue. Structure and Dynamics. Moscow: LKI, 2007. 320 p. (In Russ.)
4. Balayan A.R. On the Problem of a Functional and Linguistic Study of a Dialogue. The Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language. 1971. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 325–331. (In Russ.)
5. Kolokol’tseva T.N. Specific Communicative Units of Dialogic Speech. Volgograd: VolGU, 2001. 257 p. (In Russ.)
6. Plakhotnaya Yu.I. Dialogical Discourse in the Cognitive Aspect. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2011. No. 25 (240). Issue 58. P. 135–137. (In Russ.)
7. Khokhlovskaya O.G. On the Issues of the Comprehensive Expert Analysis of the Extremist Discourse. Contemporary Theoretical Linguistics and the Problems of Forensic Expertise. Collection of Scientific Papers on the Results of the International Scientific Conference ( Moscow, October 1–2, 2019). Moscow: Pushkin State University of Russian Language, 2019. P. 166–172. (In Russ.)
8. Goloshubina O.K. The Speech Genre “Conversation in the Messenger” As a Specific Genre of Internet Communication. Herald of Omsk University. 2015. No. 1 (75). P. 208–212. (In Russ.)
9. Karasik V.I. Language Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002. 477 p. (In Russ.)
10. Dement’ev V.V. The Theory of Speech Genres. Moscow: Znak, 2010. 600 p. (In Russ.)
11. Khurmatullin A.K. The Concept of Discourse in Modern Linguistics. Proceedings of Kazan University. Humanities Series. 2009. Vol. 151. No. 6. P. 31–37. (In Russ.)
12. Van Deik T.A. On the Definition of Discourse. Leningrad: Seidzh pablikeishens, 1998. 384 p. (In Russ.)
13. Vostrikova I.Yu. Discourse of Terrorism in the System of Special Discourses. Almanac of Modern Science and Education. 2009. No. 8 (27). P. 27–31. (In Russ.)
14. Il’enko S.G. Stylistic and Syntactic Aspects of Dialogicality. Studies on Literary Text. Materials of 3 Saratov Readings on Literary Text (Saratov, June 20–23, 1994). Saratov: Saratovskii ped. in-t, 1994. P. 19–21. (In Russ.)
15. Grafton K. Situating the Public Social Actions of Blog Posts. In: Giltrow J., Stein D. (eds). Genres in the Internet: Issue in the Theory of Genre. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2009. P. 85–112.
Review
For citations:
Berdnikova T.V. Dialogicality of the Extremism Discourse. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020;15(4):27-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-4-27-31
Views:
853
Email this article 