Negative Information: Statement of Fact or Expression of Opinion?
https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2016-3-132-145
Abstract
The paper explores the key problems of establishing the type of negative information and differentiating between facts and opinions. This is one of the most challenging problems of forensic linguistics that requires a robust methodological framework to be tackled successfully. When faced with this problem, the expert has to deal with the ambiguity of terminology and wording of questions, as well as the complexity of the object of study – the semantics of statements encountered in acts of speech. The paper analyzes the content of key terms traditionally used to address this forensic problem, and offers a possible solution. The so-called “factual square” is a method based on analyzing a statement against four semantic parameters: presence of statement of past action; verifiability of this statement on the basis of specificity of description of the action and its potential observability; lack of alternative, i.e. indication of a different possibility; the purpose of conveying negative information. The paper also analyzes the basic types of factual information and offers specific examples of semantic analysis of statements using the proposed approach.
References
1. Bel’chikov, Yu.A., Gorbanevskii M.V., Zharkov I.V. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po voprosam lingvisticheskoi ekspertizy spornykh tekstov SMI [Methodical recommendations on questions of linguistic examination of controversial texts of mass media]. Moscow: IPK Informkniga Publ, 2010. 208 p. (In Russ).
2. Gorbanevskii M.V., red. Pamyatka po voprosam naznacheniya sudebnoi lingvisticheskoi ekspertizy [Instruction concerning purpose of forensic linguistic examination]. Moscow: Medeya Publ., 2004. 104 p. (In Russ).
3. Baranov A.N. Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza teksta: teoriya i praktika: uchebnoe posobie [Linguistic examination of the text: theory and practice: education guidance]. Moscow: FLINTA: Nauka Publ., 2013. 592 p. (In Russ).
4. Brinev K.I. Teoreticheskaya lingvistika i sudebnaya lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza [Theoretical linguistics and forensic linguistic examination]. Barnaul: AltGPA Publ., 2009. 252 p. (In Russ).
5. Shmeleva T.V. Sintaksis. Sovremennyi russkii yazyk: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. Standart tret’ego pokoleniya [Syntax. Modern Russian: The textbook for higher education institutions. Standard of the third generation]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 2014. 352 p. (In Russ).
6. Kuznetsov S.A., Oleinikov S.M. Ekspertnye issledovaniya po delam o priznanii informatsionnykh materialov ekstremistskimi: teoreticheskie osnovaniya i metodicheskoe rukovodstvo [Expert researches on cases of recognition of information materials extremist: theoretical bases and methodical management]. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom V. Ema Publ., 2014. 312 p. (In Russ).
7. Osadchii M.A. Russkii yazyk na grani prava: funktsionirovanie sovremennogo Topic of the day Theory and practice of forensic science №3 (43) 2016 145 russkogo yazyka v usloviyakh pravovoi reglamentatsii rechi [Russian on the verge of the right: functioning of modern Russian in the conditions of a legal regulation of the speech]. Moscow: LIBROKOM Publ, 2013. 254 p. (In Russ).
8. Abova T.E., Kabalkina A.Yu., editors. Kommentarii k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii. T. 1. Chasti I, II GK RF. In-t gosudarstva i prava RAN [The comment to the Civil code of the Russian Federation. Vol. 1. Parts I, II of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Institution of the state and rights of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Moscow:russkogo yazyka v usloviyakh pravovoi reglamentatsii rechi [Russian on the verge of the right: functioning of modern Russian in the conditions of a legal regulation of the speech]. Moscow: LIBROKOM Publ, 2013. 254 p. (In Russ).
9. Abova T.E., Kabalkina A.Yu., editors. Kommentarii k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii. T. 1. Chasti I, II GK RF. In-t gosudarstva i prava RAN [The comment to the Civil code of the Russian Federation. Vol. 1. Parts I, II of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Institution of the state and rights of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Moscow: Yurait Publ., 2011. 926 p. (In Russ).
10. Shulepova T.I. Zashchita delovoi reputatsii [Protection of business reputation]. Available at: http://m.ekaterinburg.arbitr.ru/node/14364. (Accessed 20.03.2016). (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Kukushkina O.V. Negative Information: Statement of Fact or Expression of Opinion? Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016;(3(43)):132-145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2016-3-132-145
Views:
3464
Email this article 