Quality policy: the Role of the Head of a Forensic Organization in the Implementation of the Quality Management System
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-4-55-61
Abstract
Contemporary approaches to the quality management in a forensic organization as well as the problems of the quality assurance system organization are analyzed. The main aspects requiring close monitoring from the Head of a forensic organization when making the policy of standardization and quality management system are considered. The conceptual approaches to quality issues enunciated in the international series of standards ISO/IEC 9000-2015 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 together with the scope for their applicability to the forensic organizations are analyzed. Particular attention is paid to the problems arising when designing and implementing quality management systems, their causes are revealed and some recommendations are given including those based on the foreign experience on enhancing management efficiency.
About the Author
O. A. Surovaya
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation;
The Russian State University of Justice
Russian Federation
Surovaya Olesya Aleksandrovna – Chief Specialist
Russian Federation
Surovaya Olesya Aleksandrovna – Chief Specialist
References
1. SmirnovaS.A. Challenges of the time and expert law enforcement technologies. Multimodal edition “Forensic science: reboot”. Part 1. Moscow: EKOM, 2012. 656 p. (In Russ.)
2. Il’yasov F.N. Methodology of resource approach to the analysis of labor motives and settings. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal. 2013. No. 5. P. 13–25. (In Russ.)
3. Rossinskaya E.R. Effectiveness of forensic expert activity through the prism of judicial expertology. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2017. No. 2. P. 85–90. (In Russ.)
4. Osipenko N.I., Trifanov I.V., Oborina L.I. Motivation and management personnel as an integral part of system management quality. Vestnik of SibGAU. 2009. No. 1–2 (22). P. 106– 109. (In Russ.)
5. Moiseeva V.O. Specifics of motivation system in japan and possibility of its application in Russia. Electronic scientific & practical journal “Economics and innovations management”. 2014. No.3. Part1. (In Russ.). http://ekonomika.snauka.ru/2014/03/4343 (assessed on 25.05.2019).
6. Gugelev A.V. Innovative management on an industrial enterprise. Textbook. Moscow: ITK “Dashkov i K”, 2007. 336 p. (In Russ.)
7. Belkin R.S. Encyclopedia of forensic science. Moscow: Bek, 1997. 157 p. (In Russ.)
8. Moskvina T.P., Valitova A.R., Goncharuk N.Yu., Korol’ S.G., Lamukhina O.A., Nikulina M.V., Omel’yanyuk G.G. Experience in preparing a forensic organization to the accreditation for consistency with the ISO/IEC 17025:2017 standard (by the example of the laboratory of forensic environmental expertise of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2008. No. 2 (10). P. 41–66. (In Russ.)
9. Smirnova S.A., Omel’yanyuk G.G. The Experience of Applying Forensic Knowledge to the Cases, Connected with Breaking AntiDoping Rules. Sports in the National and the International Legal Dimensions: Actual Issues: Digest of the International Scientific Practical Conference (Moscow, April 4, 2018) / T.Y. Khabrieva (ed). Moscow: The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, 2019. P. 170–174.
10. Kokin A.V. Standardization and accreditation as the prospects of development of forensic examinations. Izvestiya Tula State University. 2017. No. 1–2. P. 17–23. (In Russ.)
11. Maylis N.P. On the training experts in educational institutions and in the system of state forensic institutions. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2007. No. 2 (6). P. 34–36. (In Russ.)
12. Yurchenko V.A., Korotkova T.V. Experience of introducing quality management system. Higher Education in Russia. 2009. No.6. P.76–81. (In Russ.)
13. Adler Yu.P., Lipkina V.V. Leadership as a mechanism to ensure competitiveness. Standards and Quality. October 2000. (In Russ.). https://ria-stk.ru/stq/adetail.php?ID=5820
14. Trišiš L. International Trends in the Field of Forensic Science Standardization, Forensic Science Standardization in Europe, Experience of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 3. С. 116–122. https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-3-116-122
15. Wilson-Wilde L. The international development of forensic science standards-A review. Forensic Science International. 2018. Vol. 288. P. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.009
Review
For citations:
Surovaya O.A. Quality policy: the Role of the Head of a Forensic Organization in the Implementation of the Quality Management System. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019;14(4):55-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-4-55-61
Views:
905
Email this article 