Establishment of Forensic Land Surveying in the System of Forensic Science Organizations of the Russian Ministry of Justice
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-2-43-49
Abstract
The ever-increasing need for land survey expertise in judicial proceedings, as well as the complexity of this branch of forensic practice require a special approach to the interpretation of theoretical foundations of forensic land surveying, which led to the author's attempt to define its basic theoretical concepts. The article also considers and describes the most common tasks performed by forensic land survey practitioners in land dispute cases.
About the Author
Zlata V. Trifonova
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation;
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Senior State Forensic Examiner at the Laboratory of Construction Forensics, Moscow 109028;
Master’s Student at the Department of Forensic Services in Law Enforcement, Moscow 117198
References
1. Sorokina E.I. Methodological guidelines for practical training in «Foundations of Land Management» for bachelor’s degree majors in Land Management and Cadastre 120700 with a concentration in Land Management. Volgograd: Volgograd State Agricultural Academy, 2012. 30 p. (In Russ.).
2. VolosnikovA.S., GrinE.A., GryadaE.A., KudryakovaD.V. Land disputes: Lecture notes. Krasnodar: Kuban State Agrarian University, 2016. 48p. (In Russ.).
3. Tishkin V.V., Seregina E.V., Kazyulin R.A., Omelyanyuk G.G. Problems in Determining the Actual Property Boundaries (Coordinates) in the Course of Forensic Land Survey. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No 3 (35). P. 19–38. (In Russ.).
4. Shalamygina A.S. Determination of Land Boundaries in Forensic Land Survey. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No 4 (36). P. 134–138. (In Russ.).
5. Skachkova M.E., Schmidt M.V. Land management expertise as a tool for land dispute resolution. Land management, land monitoring and cadaster. 2013. No 4. P. 62–67. (In Russ.).
6. Gerasimenko V.V., Dolin A.N., Shipilova I.A. Determining the market value of construction projects and functionally associated parcels of land: questions and solutions. In: Butyrin A. Yu. (red). Methodological recommendations for valuation and partitioning investigations in construction forensics. Moscow: RFCFS, 2016. P. 7–264. (In Russ.).
7. Butyrin A.Yu. The theory and practice of construction forensics. Moscow: Gorodets, 2006. 544 p. (In Russ.).
8. Shlyakhov A.R. Works on forensic science. Moscow: Nauka, 2006. 567 p. (In Russ.).
9. Orlov Yu.K. The use of specialized knowledge in criminal proceedings: Textbook. Issue 2: Forensic science: General concepts. Moscow: MSAL, 2004. 23 p. (In Russ.).
10. Selivanov N.A. Controversial issues in forensic sciences. Socialist legality = Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost’. 1978. No 5. P. 65–69 (In Russ.)
11. Arsen’ev V.D. The relationship between the concepts of subject and object in forensic science. Problems of forensic science theory: Collection of scientific works. Moscow: VNIISE, 1980. Issue 44. P. 3–23. (In Russ.).
12. Duhno N.A., Korukhov Yu.G., Mikhailov V.A. Forensic science in view of Russia’s new legislation (in criminal, civil, litigation, and administrative proceedings). Moscow: Law Institute of MIIT, 2003. 395 p. (In Russ.).
13. Orlov Yu.K. Expert testimony and its evaluation (in criminal cases). Мoscow: Yurist, 1995. 64p. (In Russ.).
14. Shlyakhov A.R. Forensic inquiry: organization and execution. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1979. 168 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Trifonova Z.V. Establishment of Forensic Land Surveying in the System of Forensic Science Organizations of the Russian Ministry of Justice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018;13(2):43-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-2-43-49
Views:
1184
Email this article 