PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF VALIDITY IN FORENSIC PRACTICE
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-1-26-40
Abstract
The author reflects on the philosophical problem of reliability of expert knowledge, not only as a procedural attribute of judicial proceedings, but primarily as a functional principle in building the entire system of forensic expert activity.
About the Author
Igor' A. Grigor'ev
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Moscow Region Branch
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Grigor’ev Igor’ Aleksandrovich – Head of the Moscow Region Branch of the RFCFSMJRF.
Odintsovo 143006
References
1. Spasovich V.D. On the theory of criminal evidence in relation to judicial system and judicial procedure. Moscow: LeksEst, 2001. XVIII, 93 p. (In Russ.).
2. Strogovich M.S. Substantive truth and judicial evidence in the Soviet criminal procedure. MoscowLeningrad: Publishing house of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1955. 384 p. (In Russ.).
3. Barygina A.A. Criteria of evidence admissibility in criminal proceedings. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2016. 190 p. (In Russ.).
4. Erpylev I.V. Evidence admissibility in criminal courts in Russia and abroad. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2017. 148 p. (In Russ.).
5. Galyashina E.I., Golikova V.V., Dmitriev E.N., et al. Forensic science: typical mistakes. Moscow: Prospekt, 2012. 544 p. (In Russ.).
6. Nakhova E.A. Current problems of the rules of evidence in civil procedure. The Leningrad legal journal = Leningradskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2016. No 3. P. 255–264. (In Russ.).
7. Molchanov V.V. Adversarial form of judicial proceedings and validity of evidence. Arbitration and Civil Litigation. 2014. No 12. P. 7–11. (In Russ.).
8. Balakshin V.S. Correlation of evidence admissibility with its relevance and validity. Legality = Zakonnost’. 2014. No 3. P. 8–14. (In Russ.).
9. Kukhta A.A. The standard of judicial proof «beyond reasonable doubt». Russian Judge. 2007. No 4. P. 18−20. (In Russ.).
10. Ovsyanikov I.V. The problem of evidence validity in rules of evidence in Russia. The Modern Law. 2004. No 7. P. 35−41. (In Russ.).
11. Amosov S. Probability and reliability of arbitration court rulings. Economy and law = Khozyaistvo i pravo. 1997. No 12. P. 130−133. (In Russ.).
12. Rarog A.I., Gracheva Yu.V. Concept, basis, features and value of judicial discretion in criminal law. State and law = Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2001. No 11. P. 51−57. (In Russ.).
13. Descartes R. Collected works in two volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl’, 1989. 654 p. (In Russ.).
14. Descartes R. Collected works in two volumes. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl’, 1994. 634 p. (In Russ.).
15. Gil’bert D., Akkerman V. Foundations of theoretical logic. Moscow: URSS, 2010. 304 p. (In Russ.).
16. Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason. Moscow: Mysl’, 1994. 592 p. (In Russ.).
17. Hume D. Collected works in two volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl’, 1996. 735 p. (In Russ.).
18. Fikhte J.G. Collected works in two volumes. Vol. 1. St.-Petersburg: Mifril,1993. 687 p. (In Russ.).
19. Leibniz G.W. New essays concerning human understanding. Moscow-Leningrad: Sotsekgiz, 1936. 484 p. (In Russ.).
20. Kant I. Collected works from 1747-1777 in two volumes. Vol. 2. Moscow: Sotsekgiz, 1940. 528 p. (In Russ.).
21. Hegel W.F. Collected works in 14 volumes. Vol. 4. Moscow: Sotsekgiz, 1959. 440 p. (In Russ.).
22. Aminev F.G. On Some Problems of Forensic Activity in the Russian Federation. Russian Judge. 2016. No 6. P. 12−16. (In Russ.).
23. Locke J. Collected works in three volumes. Vol. I. Moscow: Mysl’, 1985. 621 p. (In Russ.).
24. Gavrilov B.Ya. On restricting judicial discretion in criminal sentencing. Constitutional foundations of criminal law: Materials of the First All-Russian congress on criminal law marking the 10th anniversary of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Velbi, 2006. P. 123−128. (In Russ.).
25. Rarog A.I., Stepalin V.P. Judicial discretion in sentencing. State and Law = Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2002. No 2. P. 36−42. (In Russ.).
26. Larin A.M. From investigative version to truth. Moscow: Yurid. lit., 1976. 200 p. (In Russ.).
27. Panteleev V. Examining the validity of written evidence in the civil process. The Soviet justice = Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1975. No 5. P. 4−6. (In Russ.).
28. Matyushin B. Assessment of evidence validity by court. The Soviet justice = Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1979. No 18. P. 14−15. (In Russ.).
29. Savitskii V.M., Larin A.M. Criminal trial: A dictionary. Moscow: Institute of the State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1999. 270 p. (In Russ.).
30. Fikhte J.G. Collected works in two volumes. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg: Mifril, 1993. 798 p. (In Russ.).
31. Platon. Collected works in 4 volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl’, 1990. 860 p. (In Russ.).
32. Wittgenstein L. On certainty. Problems of Philosophy = Voprosy filosofii. 1991. No 2. P. 67−120. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Grigor'ev I.A. PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF VALIDITY IN FORENSIC PRACTICE. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018;13(1):26-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-1-26-40
Views:
956
Email this article 