Modern Models of Quality Management in Forensic Activities
https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2016-3-18-27
Abstract
The article contains analysis of modern approaches to quality management in the forensic science institutions, reviewed evolution of the view about quality as an object of management. Author considered a structure and a volume of notion of forensic science activity and mark out the elements of structure that form complex factor that affects the quality. Based on international and one’s country experience is given the historical retrospective of process of development and deployment of mechanisms of managements of quality in production and forensic science. The conceptual approaches to quality problems enshrined in the series ISO 9000 and ISO/IEC 17025 international standards, their similarities and distinction, and also applicability limits concerning activity of the forensic science institutions are analyzed. The special attention is paid to the analysis of problems arising in the design and implementation of quality management systems, identified their causes, and made recommendations for improving the effectiveness of management.
About the Author
S. A. Kuz’min
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow, 117198
References
1. Korukhov Yu.G., Kiselev S.E., Grechukha N.M. O sostoyanii vedomstvennoi i vnevedomstvennoi sudebno-ekspertnoi deyatel'nosti v Rossii-skoi Federatsii. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Problemy klassifikatsii sudebnykh ekspertiz, serti-fikatsii i validatsii metodicheskogo obespecheniya, standartizatsii su-debnoekspertnoi deyatel'nosti” [About a condition of departmental and non-departmental forensic activity in the Russian Federation. Proc. of the International scientific and practical conference "Problems of Classification of Forensic Examinations, Certifications and Validations of Methodical Providing, Standardization of Forensic Activity"]. Moscow: PROSPEKT Publ., 2016, pp.147-155. (In Russ).
2. Smirnova S.A. Sudebnaya ekspertiza: perezagruzka (mul'timodal'noe izdanie) v trekh chastyakh. [Forensic science: reboot (multimodal edition) in three parts]. Part 1. Moscow: RFTsSE Publ., 2012, 656 p. (In Russ).
3. Belkin R.S., Korukhov Yu.G. Sudebnaya ekspertiza: nuzhdy i perspektivy razvitiya [Forensic examination: needs and prospects of development]. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. 1989, No 7, pp.54-56. (In Russ).
4. Korukhov Yu.G., editor. Slovar’ osnovnykh terminov sudebnykh ekspertiz [Dictionary of the main terms of forensic examinations]. Moscow: SUDEKS Publ., 2012, 119 p. (In Russ).
5. Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I. Nastol'naya kniga sud'i. Sudebnaya ekspertiza. Teoriya i praktika, tipichnye voprosy i nestandartnye situatsii. [Reference book of the judge. Forensic science. In: Theory and practice, typical questions and unusual situations] Moscow: Prospekt Publ., 2010. 464 p. (In Russ).
6. Orlov Yu.K. Sudebnaya ekspertiza kak sredstvo dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Forensic examination as an evidentiary fact in criminal legal proceedings]. Moscow: RFTsSE Publ., 2005. 262 p. (In Russ).
7. Smirnova S.A. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar' teorii sudebnoi ekspertizy. Mul'timodal'noe izdanie “Sudebnaya ekspertiza: perezagruzka” [Encyclopedic dictionary of the theory of forensic science. Forensic science: reboot (multimodal edition) in three parts]. Part II. Moscow: RFTsSE Publ., 2012. 456 p. (In Russ).
8. Nesterov A.V. Methodology objectification forensic activity as a factor of the probative value of the result forensic. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy, 2015, No 4(40), pp.166-170. (In Russ).
9. Pavlov Yu.N., Malysheva G.V. Sistema Teilora. Vzglyad cherez 100 let [Taylor's system. A look in 100 years]. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel'stvo. 2000. No 11(11). pp. 76- 83. (In Russ).
10. Bogdanov A.A. Mezhdu chelovekom i mashinoi. O sisteme Teilora [Between the person and car. About Taylor's system]. Khar'kov, 1919. 15 p. (In Russ).
11. Juran J.M. Managerial Breakthrough. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964. 396 p.
12. Feigenbaum A. Kontrol' kachestva produktsii [Quality control of production]. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 1986. 471 p. (In Russ).
13. Vlasov B.V., editor. Organizatsiya vspomogatel'nykh sluzhb mashinostroitel'nogo zavoda [Organization of auxiliary services of engineering plant]. Moscow: MAShINOSTROENIE Publ., 1966. 523 p. (In Russ).
14. Efimov V.V. Sredstva i metody upravleniya kachestvom: uchebnoe posobie [Means and quality management methods: education guidance]. Moscow: KNORUS Publ., 2007. 232 p. (In Russ).
15. Tilstone W. Encyclopedia of Forensic Science. An Encyclopedia of History, Methods, and Techniques. ACB-CLIO, 2006. 307 p.
16. Smirnova S.A., Omel'yanyuk G.G., Usov A.I., Bebeshko G.I. Special considerations in applying the key terms and definitions of the international standard GOST ISO/IEC 17025-2009 in forensic science laboratories. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy. 2012, No 2(26), pp.56-67. (In Russ).
17. Kuz'min S.A. Guide ILAC G-19:2014 "Modules in a forensic science process" - a qualitatively new stage in the organization of accreditation of forensic science organizations. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy. 2015, No 2(38), pp.24-27. (In Russ).
18. Kopp I., Sprangers W. History of European Network of Forensic science institutes. Problems of Forensic Sciences. 2002, Vol. 50 (L), pp.203-217.
19. Usov A.I. Osobennosti adaptatsii mezhdunarodnykh standartov v su-debno-ekspertnoi deyatel'nosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Features of adaptation of the international standards in forensic activity in the Russian Federation]. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy. 2007, No 4(8), pp.52- 62. (In Russ).
20. Usov A.I., Omel'yanyuk G.G. Vozmozhnosti akkreditatsii laboratorii SEU Minyusta Rossii na sootvetstvie GOST R ISO/ MEK 17025 [Possibilities of accreditation of laboratories of forensic institutions of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on compliance of state standard specification P ISO/MEK 17025]. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy. 2009, No 2(14), pp.52-57. (In Russ).
21. Zamaraeva N.A. Implementing a quality management system at the NorthWestern Regional center of forensic science of the Russian Ministry of justice. Teoriya i praktika sudeb-noi ekspertizy. 2014, No 3(35), pp.142- 145. (In Russ).
22. Knowledge for a successful forensic chain provided by The Netherlands Forensic Institute // Published by: Netherlands Forensic Institute Ministry of Security and Justice. Rijksoverheid, November 2013. Available at: http://www.forensicinstitute.nl/Images/brochure-nfi-academy-knowledge-for-a-successful-forensic-chain_tcm120-446193.pdf (accessed - 26.07.2016).
23. Vavilin Ya.A. Razrabotka i issledovanie sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva s pozitsii obshchei teorii sistem [Development and research of quality management system according to the general theory of systems]. Standarty i kachestvo. 2010, No 5, pp.77-80. (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Kuz’min S.A. Modern Models of Quality Management in Forensic Activities. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016;(3(43)):18-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2016-3-18-27
Views:
934
Email this article 