Errors in Forensic Ballistics: Causes and Elimination
https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2017-12-1-78-84
Abstract
About the Author
A. V. KokinRussian Federation
DSc (Law), Lead State Forensic Examiner at the Laboratory of Forensic Ballistics of the Russian Federal Center of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation
References
1. Galyashina E.I., Golikova V.V., Dmitriev E.N. et al. (Rossinskaya E.R., editor). Sudebnaya ekspertiza: tipichnye oshibki [Forensics: typical mistakes]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2012. 544 p. (In Russ).
2. Federal'nyi zakon ot 13.12.1996 g. № 150-FZ “Ob oruzhii” [The Federal law from 12/13/1996 No. 150-FZ "About weapon"]. Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii = Collection of the legislation of the Russian Federation, 1996. No. 51. Art. 5681. (In Russ).
3. Ustinov A.I. Nekotorye nedostatki sudebno-ballisticheskikh ekspertiz pri provedenii diagnosticheskikh issledovanii [Some shortcomings of forensic and ballistic examinations when conducting diagnostic testings]. Ekspertnaya tekhnika. 2002. No 128. pp. 103–108. (In Russ).
4. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 12.03.2002. No 5 “O sudebnoi praktike po delam o khishchenii, vymogatel'stve i nezakonnom oborote oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i vzryvnykh ustroistv” [The resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation from 3/12/2002 No. 5 "About jurisprudence on cases of plunder, extortion and arms trafficking, ammunition, explosives and explosive devices"]. Rossiiskaya gazeta = Russian newspaper. 3/19/2002 No. 48. (In Russ).
5. Avetisyan V.R. Obobshchenie ekspertnoi praktiki proizvodstva sudebno-ballisticheskikh ekspertiz v SEU sistemy Minyusta RF pri reshenii voprosa po identifikatsii ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya s nareznym stvolom po sledam na strelyanoi gil'ze [Synthesis of expert practice of forensic ballistic examinations in forensic institutions of system of Russian Ministry of Justice at identification of firearms with a rifle barrel on traces on a shot sleeve]. Theory and practice of forensic science = Teoriya i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy. 2008. No 2 (10). pp. 80–92. (In Russ).
6. Kokin A.V., Mokrousov A.A., Orlova O.S. Perspectives of non-coated composite bullets criminalistic research. Theory and practice of forensic science = Teoriya i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy. 2010. No 2 (18). pp. 92–103. (In Russ).
7. Lazareva L.V. Procedural errors of forensic examination: causes and ways of their elimination. Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2012. No 1 (29). pp. 10–17. (In Russ).
8. Gorbachev I.V. Obobshchenie ekspertnoi praktiki proizvodstva sudebno-ballisticheskikh ekspertiz SEU sistemy Minyusta Rossii pri reshenii voprosa o tekhnicheskom sostoyanii ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya [Synthesis of expert practice of forensic ballistic examinations in forensic institutions of system of the Russian Ministry of Justice at the solution of a question of technical condition of firearms]. Theory and practice of forensic science = Teoriya i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy. 2008. No 2 (10). pp. 93–104. (In Russ).
9. Kokin A.V. Diagnostics of a method of producing a rifled shotgun barrel by its marks left on the bullets. Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2012. No 4 (32). pp. 26–34. (In Russ).
10. Kokin A.V. The concept of subclass signs in firearms identification. Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2013. No 4 (36). pp. 37–43. (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Kokin A.V. Errors in Forensic Ballistics: Causes and Elimination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017;12(1):78-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2017-12-1-78-84