Forensic Diagnostics of the Circumstances of Digital Video and Audio Production: Analytical Review
https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2017-12-1-48-71
Abstract
The analytical review examines the issues of forensic investigation into the circumstances of production of digital video and audio recordings. The paper presents the organization and lines of inquiry in forensic analysis of video and audio evidence, computer forensics, forensic linguistics, and psychological evaluation established in the system of forensic science organizations of the Russian Ministry of Justice by 2013–2016. The analysis covers the issues of independent or integrated application of the listed types of special knowledge in order to meet the discipline-specific and comprehensive objectives of determining the circumstances of video/audio production. General strategies and types of forensic diagnostics of production circumstances are discussed without too much emphasis on the methodological minutiae of every stage of the investigation.
About the Authors
M. A. Voznyuk
Southern Regional Center of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don
Russian Federation
Head of the Computer Forensics Department, Southern Regional Center of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice
Russian Federation
Head of the Computer Forensics Department, Southern Regional Center of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice
Yu. A. Denisov
Tomsk Laboratory of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Tomsk
Russian Federation
PhD (Physics & Mathematics), Head of the Department of Forensic Technical Accounting, Tomsk Laboratory of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice
Russian Federation
PhD (Physics & Mathematics), Head of the Department of Forensic Technical Accounting, Tomsk Laboratory of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice
References
1. Kaganov A.Sh., Mailis N.P., Mikhailov V.G., Bryzgunova E.A., Koval’ S.L., et al. Sovremennye metody, tekhnicheskie i programmnye sredstva, ispol’zuemye v kriminalisticheskoi ekspertize zvukozapisei (Metodicheskoe posobie dlya ekspertov). Moscow: RFTsSE pri Minyuste Rossii, 2003. 255 p. (In Russ.)
2. Kaganov A.Sh. Kriminalisticheskaya ekspertiza zvukozapisei. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2005. 272 p. (In Russ.)
3. Kaganov A.Sh. Kriminalisticheskaya ekspertiza video- i zvukozapisei: sushchnost’, vnutrennie vzaimosvyazi, mesto v obshchei ierarkhii sudebnykh ekspertiz [Criminalistic examination video and sound recordings: essence, internal interrelations, the place in the general hierarchy of forensic examinations]. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2007. No 3 (7). pp. 12–15. (In Russ.)
4. Koval’ S.L., Svirava T.N., Denisov Yu.A., Voznyuk M.A., Petrov S.M. Osnovnye ponyatiya, opredeleniya i spetsial’nye terminy kriminalisticheskoi ekspertizy zvukozapisei. Moscow: FBU RFTsSE pri Minyuste Rossii, 2013. 63 p. (In Russ.)
5. Edzhubov L.G., Karpukhina E.S., Usov A.I, Khatuntsev N.A., et al. Proizvodstvo sudebnoi komp’yuterno-tekhnicheskoi ekspertizy. IV. Aktual’nye kompleksnye ekspertnye zadachi. Moscow: RFTsSE pri Minyuste Rossii, 2011. 295 p. (In Russ.)
6. Korukhov Yu.G. (editor) Osnovy sudebnoi ekspertizy. Chast’ 1: Kurs obshchei teorii: Metodicheskoe posobie dlya ekspertov, sledovatelei i sudei. Moscow: RFTsSE pri Minyuste Rossii, 1997. 430 p. (In Russ.)
7. Korukhov Yu.G, Mailis N.P., Orlova V.F. Kriminalisticheskaya ekspertnaya diagnostika. Metodicheskoe posobie. Moscow: RFTsSE pri Minyuste Rossii, 2003. 200 p. (In Russ.)
8. Edzhubov L.G., Usov A.I, Karpukhina E.S., Khatuntsev N.A., et al. Proizvodstvo sudebnoi komp’yuterno-tekhnicheskoi ekspertizy. (III. Spetsializirovannyi slovar’ komp’yuternoi leksiki dlya ekspertov sudebnoi komp’yuterno-tekhnicheskoi ekspertizy). Moscow: GU RFTsSE pri Minyuste Rossii, 2009. 154 p. (In Russ.)
9. Khitina M.V. Differentsiatsiya spontannoi (nepodgotovlennoi) i podgotovlennoi ustnoi rechi: Metodicheskoe pis’mo dlya ekspertov. Moscow: RFTsSE pri Minyuste Rossii, 2003. 52 p. (In Russ.)
10. Blokhin A.S., Zotov A.B. K voprosu provedeniya kriminalisticheskoi ekspertizy videozapisei. Moscow: Kanon”, 2011. 157 p. (In Russ.)
11. Ivanov I.L. Tablitsa vektorov identifikatsionnykh priznakov izmenenii video-audio zapisei, proizvedennykh v protsesse zapisi ili posle na tsifrovykh nositelyakh informatsii. Materials of international scientificpractical conference “Funktsional’nye stili zvuchashchei rechi” (Moscow, Lomonosov University, 5–17 September 2005). Available at: http://www.illidiy.orel.ru/Pub/ publ10.htm (accessed on 15.02.2017). (In Russ.)
12. Boyarov A. Detecting and analysis of mp3, wma, ogg and vorbis codecs traces in audio signal. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016. No 1 (41). pp. 78–86. (In Russ.)
13. Ivanov I.L. Issledovanie raspredeleniya vesovykh otschetov audiofailov. Available at: http://www.illidiy.orel.ru/Pub/publ11 (accessed on 15.02.2017). (In Russ).
14. Petrov S.M. Obstoyatel’stva izgotovleniya tsifrovogo izobrazheniya kak predmet ekspertnogo issledovaniya. Materials of All-Russian Seminar “Razvitie novykh vidov i napravlenii sudebnoi ekspertizy” (Rostov-on-Don, 14–17 June, 2011). Rostov-on-Don: Yuzhnyi RTsSE Minyusta Rossii, 2011. pp. 144–154. (In Russ.)
15. Koenig B.E., Lacey D.S. An Inconclusive Digital Audio Authenticity Examination: A Unique Case. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2012. Volume 57, Issue 1, pp. 239–245. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01899.
16. Ivanov I.L, Petrov S.M. Prakticheskoe primenenie rogram DUMP I AVIZO dlya issledovaniya videofonogramm formata DV Materials of All-Russian Seminar “Razvitie novykh vidov I napravlenii sudebnoi ekspertizy” (Rostov-on-Don, 14–17 June, 2011). Rostov-on-Don: Yuzhnyi RtsSE Minyusta Rossii, 2011. Pp. 187–198. (In Russ.)
17. Khatuntsev N., Lizorkin A. Method of proof invariability images in the computertechnical expertise (from expert practice). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No 3 (35). Pp. 69–73. (In Russ.)
18. Boyarov A. Detecting post-production tampering artifacts in video and audio recordins on FAT16 and FAT32 formatted storage devices (methodology recommendations for forensic practitioners). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No 3 (35). pp. 76–92. (In Russ.)
19. Organizatsiya proizvodstva kompleksnykh ekspertiz v sudebno-ekspertnykh uchrezhdeniyakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Metodicheskie rekomendatsii) [The organization of production of complex examinations in forensic and expert institutions of the Russian Federation (Methodical recommendations)]. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2008. No 1 (9). pp. 57–60. (In Russ.)
20. Smirnova S.A. Sudebnaya ekspertiza na rubezhe XXI veka. Sostoyanie, razvitie, problem. St. Peterburg: Piter, 2004. 875 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Voznyuk M.A., Denisov Yu.A. Forensic Diagnostics of the Circumstances of Digital Video and Audio Production: Analytical Review. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017;12(1):48-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2017-12-1-48-71
Views:
1565
Email this article 