The Interrogation of Experts and Specialists in the Civil Proceeding (Recomendations to the Expert, the Court, the Parties' Representatives)
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2016-1-38-51
Abstract
Interrogation of the expert is very significant difficulty for the subjects of interrogation, as the plaintiff, the defendant and the court are not well versed in the area of knowledge possessed by the expert. It is not always tactically ready and competent experts for the implementation of this procedural action. However, it is an expert- Interrogation helps to assess the probative value of its conclusion. This article presents some tactical recommendations Interrogation of experts and specialists in civil and arbitration processes, knowledge and observance of which will be useful both to the court and the representatives of the parties and experts.
About the Author
M. V. Zhizhina
Criminalistic at Moscow State law University n.a. O.E. Kutafin (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Associate Professor, Candidate of Law
Russian Federation
Associate Professor, Candidate of Law
References
1. Shumilin S.F., Zavidov B.D. Metodologicheskie, takticheskie i yuridicheskie problemy doprosa / SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus". (In Russ.).
2. Ryzhakov A.P. Osnovaniya, usloviya i poryadok proizvodstva doprosa eksperta na stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya. Kommentarii k st. 205 UPK RF // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. 2004. (In Russ.).
3. Galyashin N.V., Galyashina E.I. Osobennosti doprosa eksperta i spetsialista v sude prisyazhnykh zasedatelei//Voronezhskie kriminalisticheskie chteniya: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. -Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezh. gos. un-ta, 2010, Vyp. 12. (In Russ.).
4. Liluashvili T.A. Ekspertiza v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse. Tbilisi: Metsniereba, 1967;
5. Davtyan A.G. Ekspertiza v grazhdanskom protsesse. M.: Spark, 1995. (In Russ.).
6. Cakhnova T.V. Ekspertiza v sude po grazhdanskim delam: Uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie. M.: BEK, 1997. (In Russ.).
7. Tikhinya V.G. Primenenie kriminalisticheskoi taktiki v grazhdanskom protsesse (pri issledovanii veshchestvennykh dokazatel'stv). Minsk: BGU, 1976. (In Russ.).
8. Rozhkov A.Yu. Kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo sudoproizvodstva: dis..k.yu.n. Voronezh, 2003. (In Russ.).
9. Azarenko I.V. Issledovanie i otsenka zaklyucheniya eksperta v sudebnom razbiratel'stve po grazhdanskim delam // Zhurnal nauchnykh publikatsii aspirantov i doktorantov. (In Russ.). URL: http://www.jurnal.org.
10. Aginskii V.N. Ustanovlenie davnosti vypolneniya shtrikhov rukopisnykh tekstov: Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. (In Russ.).
11. Sudebno-pocherkovedcheskaya ekspertiza. Osobennaya chast'. GU RFTsSE pri Minyuste Rossii, M.: Nauka, 2007. (In Russ.).
12. Treushnikov M.K. Sudebnye dokazatel'stva. M.: Gorodets, 1997. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Zhizhina M.V. The Interrogation of Experts and Specialists in the Civil Proceeding (Recomendations to the Expert, the Court, the Parties' Representatives). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016;(1(41)):38-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2016-1-38-51
Views:
1283
Email this article 