Typology of Forensic Situations That Arise in the Course of Arbitration Proceedings and Require the Use of Special Knowledge in Construction and Construction Engineering
https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2016-1-16-24
Abstract
The paper looks at the circumstances that shape forensic situations, the resolution of which requires the court to appoint a forensic expert or specialist possessing special knowledge in construction and construction engineering. It proposes a system for typification of forensic situations that serves to identify their key characteristics, which, according to the author, would in turn facilitate further development of the theory of construction forensics and its adaptation to practical settings.
About the Author
E. Stativa
The Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
State forensic examiner Laboratory of Construction Forensics Russian
Russian Federation
State forensic examiner Laboratory of Construction Forensics Russian
References
1. Shlyakhov A.R. Problema klassifikatsii v kriminalisticheskoi ekspertize, ee prakticheskoe znachenie. M., 1974. S. 3. (In Russ.)
2. Kudryavtsev V.N. Ob"ektivnaya storona prestupleniya. Moscow, 1960. S.213 (In Russ.)
3. Butyrin A.Yu., Grabbe T.A., Khisheva O.I. «Opredelenie tekhnicheskoi vozmozhnosti i razrabotka variantov preobrazovaniya zhilogo doma kak elementa domovladeniya v sootvetstvii s usloviyami, zadannymi sudom». Sbornik metodicheskikh rekomendatsii po proizvodstvu sudebnykh stroitel'no-tekhnicheskikh ekspertiz. Moscow: RFTsSE, 2012. S. 55-94. (In Russ.)
4. Stativa E.B. Principles of object divisibility and criteria for the division of construction objects of different functionality. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2013. No. 1(29).S.75-80. (In Russ.)
5. Treushnikov M.K. Sudebnye dokazatel'stva. Moscow, 1997. S. 38. (In Russ.)
6. Alekseev V.A. Nedvizhimoe imushchestvo: gosudarstvennaya registratsiya i problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya. Moscow: Volters Kluver, 2007. S. 53. (In Russ.)
7. Abramov V.V. Ponyatie i priznaki nedvizhimosti povyshennogo riska kak ob"ekta grazhdanskogo prava. «Biznes, Menedzhment i Pravo», 2013, No. 11 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». (In Russ.)
8. Kazyulin A.S., Koshelev D.M., Makhnin E.L., Fedotov S.V. Issledovanie avtomototransportnykh sredstv v tselyakh opredeleniya stoimosti vosstanovitel'nogo remonta i otsenki: Metodicheskoe rukovodstvo dlya sudebnykh ekspertov. Moscow: RFTsSE, 2008. S. 10, 28. (In Russ.)
9.
Review
For citations:
Stativa E. Typology of Forensic Situations That Arise in the Course of Arbitration Proceedings and Require the Use of Special Knowledge in Construction and Construction Engineering. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016;(1(41)):16-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2016-1-16-24
Views:
756
Email this article 