Preview

Theory and Practice of Forensic Science

Advanced search

Features of Forensic Education in the Republic of Kazakhstan

https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2025-4-125-133

Abstract

   The article analyzes the current state and problems of forensic education in the Republic of Kazakhstan as well as offers recommendations for improvement of the relevant training system. Special attention is paid to the experience of Russia where there is a system of educational institutions and research centers engaged in training and retraining of forensic experts, which contributes to the development of highly qualified personnel. The issues of nostrification of documents are considered with regard to the foreign education framework in the field of forensic science. It is shown that forensic education in Kazakhstan requires expansion of the list of expert specialties and unification and institutional strengthening as well. The results obtained can be used in the development of new educational programs, improvement of legal framework and international cooperation in the area of forensic examination.

About the Author

N. V. Britvak
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation

Nikita Vital’evich Britvak, Post-Graduate Student

Law Institute; Forensiс Science Department

117198; Moscow



References

1. Wickenheiser R., Cadau A., Muro C., Whitfield S., McGinnis C., Murray L., France M., Niles L, Barron D., Valentin L. The Forensic Educational Outreach Initiative – Bridging the Gap Between Education and Workplace. Forensic Science International: Synergy. Vol. 8. 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100448

2. Nilendu D. Enhancing Forensic Education: Exploring the Importance and Implementation of Evidence-Based Education System. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2024. No. 14. doi: 10.1186/s41935-023-00375-w

3. Smirnova S.A. The Presence of Special Education is a Necessary but Not Sufficient Condition for Competence. Criminological Journal. 2024. No. 1. P. 137–139. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24412/2687-0185-2024-1-137-139

4. Yastrebov O.A., Panova I.V. Digitalization of Education – a New Stage in the Development of a Classical University. Public Law Today. 2022. No. 3 (13). P. 6–22. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24411/2541-8440-2022-3-0001

5. Ritesh K.Sh. A New Systematic Approach of Teaching and Learning of Forensic Science for Interdisciplinary Students: A Step towards Renovating the Forensic Education System. Forensic Science International: Synergy. 2021 Vol. 3. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100146

6. Smirnova S.A., Popov A.I. Actual Issues of Forensic Activity in the Conditions of Eurasian Integration. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2014. No. 16. P. 75–79. (In Russ.).

7. Smirnova S.A. Ethics and Axiology of Forensic Science Activity: Balance of Meanings, Interests, New Challenges of the Time and Old Problems. Bulletin of Economic Security. 2023. No. 2. P. 159–163. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24412/2414-3995-2023-2-159-163

8. Rossinskaya E.R. Current Problems in Forensic Expert Training and Continuing Education in Selected Forensic Science Specialties. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 78–85. (In Russ.). doi: 10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-3-78-85

9. Rossinskaya E.R. Competence-based Approach as the Basis of Forensic Didactics // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2016. No. 5. P. 76–81. (In Russ.).

10. Smirnova S.A., Kokin A.V. Concept of the Interdepartmental Center for Additional Professional Education of Forensic Experts. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 8–14. (In Russ.) doi: 10.30764/1819-2785-2020-2-8-14

11. Maylis N.P. Enhancing Professional Training of Forensic Scientists. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 50–53. (In Russ.) doi: 10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-2-50-53

12. Yastrebov O.A. , Smirnova S.A., Surovaya O.A. Forensic Expert Didactics as a Modern Training Mechanism of the Young Generation of Forensic Experts. Legal Education and Science. 2024. № 10. P. 12–16. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18572/1813-1190-2024-10-12-16

13. Chesnokova E.V. Department of Forensic Activity is an Example of the Synthesis of Science and Forensic Practices and Education. RUDN Journal of Law. 2020. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 193–202. (In Russ.). doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2020-24-1-193-202

14. Smirnova S.A. Forensic Expert Activity in Law Enforcement: Introduction to the Master’s Program : Textbook. Moscow: RUDN, 2017. 528 p. (In Russ.).

15. Smirnova S.A., Yastrebov O.A. The Progressive Models of Educational Activities as a Basis for the Training of Forensic Medical Experts of the New Generation. Forensic Medical Expertise. 2017. Vol. 60. No. 1. P. 56–59. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/sudmed201760156-59

16. Usov A.I., Omel’yanyuk G.G., Lapina I.A. Modern Forensic Education Model // Theory and Practice of Forensic Science in Сurrent Conditions. Proceedings of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference (Moscow, January 26–27, 2023). Moscow: Block-Print, 2023. P. 352–355. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Britvak N.V. Features of Forensic Education in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2025;20(4):125-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2025-4-125-133

Views: 391

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1819-2785 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7275 (Online)