On Some Issues of an Expert Study of the Readiness and Cost of Design Documentation for Construction Projects
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2024-2-31-39
Abstract
The article discusses some aspects of the study of the readiness and cost of design documentation of construction projects in forensic examination; establishes the objects of such examination; describes their quality criteria. The authors analyze the most common mistakes in forensic research, as well as the possibilities for solving terminological problems and integrating conceptual fields of different sciences. They also show the perspectives of applying the theory of qualimetry and the economic theory of utility in an expert study of the readiness and cost of design documentation for construction projects. A general comprehensive assessment of project quality has been developed: special attention has been paid to absolute and relative indicators of the readiness of project documentation.
The authors propose a reasonable version of the calculation justification for the degree of readiness of project documentation, they show the advantages of the suggested methodological approach, and first of all, the possibility of applying computer processing of results and the relative simplicity of the software calculation algorithm.
About the Authors
F. G. Aminev
Ufa University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aminev Farit Gizarovich – Doctor of Law, Professor of the Department of Criminalistics of the Institute of Law of Ufa University of Science and Technology, Honored Lawyer of the Republic of Bashkortostan, Academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Chairman of the Public Council for Expert Activities in the Republic of Bashkortostan
Ufa 450076
S. A. Zamyatin
ANO “Non-State Forensic Expertise Novosibirsk region"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zamyatin Sergei Aleksandrovich – forensic expert, director of “Non-state Forensic Expertise of the Novosibirsk Region”, member of the Presidium of the Interregional public organization for the development of expert and forensic activities “MOES”
Novosibirsk 630003
References
1. Marx K. Capital. Vol. 1. Moscow: IPL. 1978. (In Russ.).
2. Hanley J.E. All Value Is Subjective, and That’s a Good Thing. AIER, October 26, 2021. American Institute for Economic Research. October 26, 2021. https://www.aier.org/article/all-value-is-subjective-and-thats-a-good-thing/
3. Zaikov G.I., Romanov R.G. Level of Quality and Cost of Products. Moscow: Ekonomika, 1970. 119 p. (In Russ.).
4. Subbetto A.I. Essays. Noospherism: In 13 Volumes. Volume Eight: Qualitativeism: Philosophy and Theory of Quality, Qualitology, Quality of Life, Human Quality and Quality of Education. Book 1 / L.A. Zelenov (ed.). St. PetersburgKostroma: KGU im. N.A. Nekrasova, 2009. (In Russ.).
5. Sis’kov V.I. Economic and Statistical Study of Product Quality. Moscow: Statistika, 1971. 256 p. (In Russ.).
6. Bentham I. Introduction to the Foundations of Morality and Legislation. Moscow: Rosspen, 1998. 415 p. (In Russ.).
7. Friedrich von Wieser. Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Wirtschaft J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). 1924. 330 p.
8. Bates C.J. Distribution of Wealth. Moscow: Ekonomika, 1992. 446 p. (In Russ.).
9. Azgal’dov G.G., Azgal’dova L.A. Quantitative Quality Assessment (Qualimetry). Bibliography. Moscow: Izd-vo standartov, 1971. 176 p. (In Russ.).
10. Azgal’dov G.G., Glichev A.V., Panov V.P. What is Quality? Moscow: Ekonomika, 1968. 135 p. (In Russ.).
11. Azgal’dov G.G. Use Value and Its Measurement. Moscow: Economics, 1971. 167 p. (In Russ.).
12. Azgal’dov G.G., Raikhman E.P. On the Qualimetry. Moscow: Izd-vo standartov, 1973. 172 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Aminev F.G., Zamyatin S.A. On Some Issues of an Expert Study of the Readiness and Cost of Design Documentation for Construction Projects. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2024;19(2):31-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2024-2-31-39
Views:
627
Email this article 