On Some Aspects of the Participation of Experts and Specialists in Criminal Proceedings in the Republic of Kazakhstan
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2023-4-72-81
Abstract
The article considers particular reasons for the start of a pre-trial investigation, which are associated with the participation of persons having specialized knowledge in the proceedings.
By using a number of methods of cognition of the circumstances of reality, the authors identify the issues that require resolution at the intersectoral level. Among the problematic aspects that cause the violation of citizens’ rights, there is a premature start of the pre-trial investigation, which is also due to the inconsistency and unreliability of the conclusions of experts and specialists involved both before and during the pre-trial investigation.
To improve the studied sphere of public relations, proposals are made on overcoming of organizational and legal shortcomings of operational investigative activities, reasons for starting a pre-trial investigation, as well as filling the gaps in the current legislation, in terms of bringing experts and specialists to administrative and criminal responsibility.
About the Authors
K. K. Seitenov
Law Enforcement Academy under the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Seitenov Kaliolla Kabayevich – Doctor of Law, First Vice-Rector of the Law Enforcement
Astana city 020000
A. Z. Saken
Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Abdolla Saken Zhusipahmetovich – Candidate of Law, Judge of the Supreme Court
Astana city 020000
References
1. Biekenov N.A. Selected Aspects of Law Enforcement Activities of the Republic of Kazakhstan That Ensure Constitutional Control. Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2014. No. 2 (34). P. 10–15. (In Russ.).
2. Dzhansaraeva R.E. Mechanisms for Creating an Effective Crime Prevention System. Vestnik KazNU. 2012. No. 3 (63). P. 76–79. (In Russ.)
3. Kostenko R.V., Rudin A. Notion and Meaning of Evidence Verification in Criminal Procedure. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 2018. No. 3 (33). P. 1011–1017.
4. Khanov T.A., Sadvakasova A.T. On The New System of Recording and Registration of Complaints, Statements and Other Information on Criminal Offenses. Russian Journal of Criminology. 2019. No. 2 (13). P. 340–353. (In Russ.). https://www.doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(2).340-353
5. Alimova E.A. The Efficiency of Special Knowledge in Criminal Proceeding. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 2016. No. 5 (7). P. 964–971. https://journals.aser-spublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/505
6. Borchashvili I.Sh. (Ed.). Commentary on the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Special Part. 2nd ed. Almaty: Zheti zharry, 2007. (In Kaz.).
7. Aubakirova A.A. Investigative and Expert Errors in the Formation of Internal Beliefs: Abstract of the Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Law. Chelyabinsk, 2010. 44 p. (In Russ.).
8. Nagoeva M.A. The Use of the Results of the Operational and Investigative Activities during the Preliminary Investigation. Contemporary Issues of Science and Education. 2015. No. 1-1. P. 17–21. (In Russ.).
9. Vapniarchuk V.V., Trofymenko V.M., Shylo O.G., Maryniv V.I. Standards of Criminal Procedure Evidence. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 2019. No. 7 (9). P. 2462–2470. https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.7(37).34
10. Aubakirova A.A., Syrlybayev M. Errors on the pre-Trial Investigation: Legal Nature and Causes. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 2019. No. 6 (7). P. 1504–1508. https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/arti-cle/view/645
11. Okudzhava V.V. Substance over Form Concepts in Financial Accounting and Tax Law. Audit and Financial Analysis. 2011. No. 4. P. 1–8. (In Russ.). https://auditfin.com/fin/2011/4/2011_IV_02_07.pdf
Review
For citations:
Seitenov K.K., Saken A.Z. On Some Aspects of the Participation of Experts and Specialists in Criminal Proceedings in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2023;18(4):72-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2023-4-72-81
Views:
294
Email this article 