The Role and Significance of Manager's Activity in the Production of Forensic Examinations and Expert Research
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2023-3-52-59
Abstract
The article discusses the possibility of introducing the position of manager to the staff of forensic institutions. The author substantiates the necessity of introduction of the management system for forensic expert activity into the universal practice of forensic institutions, i.e. a management system aimed at improving the quality and effectiveness of the activities of each individual institution and the system as a whole.
The article outlines the goals and objectives of the implementation of the management system, suggests the areas of specialization of managers, and also calculates the economic effect of the introduction of the position of manager.
It is shown that the introduction of the position of manager in the staff of forensic expert institutions will reduce the time for the production of forensic examinations (by eliminating the non-core expert work); improve the quality of examinations (by introducing additional performance control for forensic expert activities); optimize scientific and methodological work, including contributing to the development of new and improvement of existing expert techniques.
About the Author
V. A. Epshtein
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba; Private expert institution “Municipal Institution of Forensic Expertise”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Epshtein Vadim Arkad’evich – graduate student of RUDN University, Director of development
Moscow 117198
Sankt-Petersburg 191123
References
1. Smirnova S.A., Omel’yanyuk G.G., Bebeshko G.I. Quality Management System in Forensic Expert Activity. In: Smirnova S.A. (Ed.). Multimodal Edition “Forensic Science: reset”. Part 2. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Theory of Forensic Science. Moscow: Ekom, 2012. P. 301–303. (In Russ.).
2. Smirnova S.A. Multimodal Edition “Forensic Science: reset”. Part 1. Challenges of the Time and Expert Technologies of Law Enforcement. Moscow: Ekom, 2012. 656 p. (In Russ.).
3. Zamaraeva N.A. Implementing a Quality Management System at the North-Western Regional Center of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No. 3 (35). P. 142–145. (In Russ.).
4. Chesnokova E.V. On the Development of Working with Personnel in Forensic Organizations under the Requirements of the International Standard ISO/IEC 17025:2017. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 75–83. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-1-75-83
5. Iliassov F.N. Methodology of Resource Approach to the Analysis of Work Motives and Attitudes. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal. 2013. No. 5. P. 13–25. (In Russ.).
6. Rossinskaya E.R. Effectiveness of Forensic Expert Activity through the Prism of Judicial Expertology. Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2017. No. 2. P. 85–90. (In Russ.).
7. Yurchenko V.A., Korotkova T.V. Experience of Introducing Quality Management System. Higher Education in Russia. 2009. No. 6. P. 76–81. (In Russ.).
8. Osipenko N.I., Trifanov I.V., Oborina L.I. Motivation and Management Personnel as an Integral Part of System Management Quality. The Siberian Aerospace Journal. 2009. No. 1–2 (22). P. 106–109. (In Russ.).
9. Surovaya O.A. Quality policy: the Role of the Head of a Forensic Organization in the Implementation of the Quality Management System. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 55–61. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-4-55-61
Review
For citations:
Epshtein V.A. The Role and Significance of Manager's Activity in the Production of Forensic Examinations and Expert Research. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2023;18(3):52-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2023-3-52-59
Views:
623
Email this article 