Principles of Forensic Linguistic Research
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-3-80-86
Abstract
The article reviews the key principles of the forensic linguistic research conducted within the framework of forensic linguistics: linguistic, author’s, forensic analysis of video and sound recordings and examination of intellectual property objects. They are the principles of objectivity, comprehensiveness and completeness of the study, consistency, scientific validity, necessity and sufficiency, verifiability, criteria orientation, accessibility of the description of study process and results. It has been shown that the listed principles represent the guiding ideas, attitudes applied by an expert linguist when conducting expert activities.
About the Author
V. O. Kuznetsov
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kuznetsov Vitaly Olegovich – Candidate of Law, Candidate of Philology, Head of the Laboratory of Forensics Linguistics
Moscow 109028
References
1. Kondakov N.I. Logic Dictionary and Reference Book. 2nd ed. Moscow: Nauka, 1975. 721 p. (In Russ.).
2. Galyashina E.I. Forensic Speech Studies. Textbook. Moscow: Prospekt, 2021. 424 p. (In Russ.).
3. Kobozeva I.M. Linguistic Semantics: Textbook. 3rd ed. Moscow: KomKniga, 2007. 352 p. (In Russ.).
4. Mamaev N.Yu. The Issue of Objectification of the Understanding of a Controversial Text within Forensic Linguistics. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 6–18. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-4-6-18
5. Ahmad S., Wasim S, Irfan S., et al. Qualitative v/s. Quantitative Research – A Summarized Review. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare. 2019. Vol. 6. No. 43. P. 2828–2832. https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2019/587
6. Vul S.M. Forensic Authorship Identification. Methodical Basis. Methodological Manual. Kharkov: KHNIISE, 2007. 64 p. (In Russ.).
7. Edzhubov L.G. Systematic Approach in Expertise. Multimodal Edition “Forensic Expertise: Reboot”. Part II. Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Theory of Forensic Examination / S.A. Smirnova (ed.). Moscow: EKOM, 2012. P. 303–306. (In Russ.).
8. Aver’yanova T.V. Forensic Expertise. Course of General Theory. Moscow: Norma, 2006. 480p. (In Russ.).
9. Usov A.I., Karpukhina E.S., Kuznetsov V.O. Some Aspects of Applying a Systematic Approach to the Study of the Objects of Forensic Examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2022. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 6–17. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-2-6-17
10. Orlov Yu.K. Forensic Expertise as a Means of Proof in Criminal Proceedings. Moscow: IPK RFTsSE, 2005. 264 p. (In Russ.).
11. Butyrin A.Yu., Trifonova Z.V. Ensuring the Reliability of Conclusions in the Expert’s Statement in the Course of a Forensic Construction Investigation. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 78– 84. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-3-78-84
12. Maximov O.A., Orlov A.A. The Requirement of “Verifiability” of the Expert’s Conclusion as an Element of the Mechanism for Exercising the Right to Petition in Criminal Proceedings. Union of Forensic Scientists and Criminologists. 2018. No. 3. P. 36–41. (In Russ.).
13. Kukushkina O.V., Safonova Yu.A., Sekerazh T.N. Theoretical and Methodical Bases of Forensic Psychological and Linguistic Examination of Texts on the Affairs Connected with Counteraction to Extremism. Moscow: RFCFS, 2011. 326 p. (In Russ.).
14. Sekerazh T.N. Methodological Principles of Information Materials Research in Forensic Psychology. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 26–39. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-4-26-39
15. Sekerazh T.N. Psychological Forensic Examination of Information Material: Theory and Practice. Monograph. Moscow: RFCFS, 2021, 405 р. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/978-5-91133-231-0-2021-13
Review
For citations:
Kuznetsov V.O. Principles of Forensic Linguistic Research. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2022;17(3):80-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-3-80-86
Views:
800
Email this article 