Possibilities of Applying the ILAC-G19:06/2022 Manual “Modules in the Forensic Process” to Improve Forensic Activities
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-3-70-79
Abstract
The article considers the possibilities of applying the ILAC–G19:06/2022 Manual (hereinafter referred to as the Manual) in forensic activities, which presents the specifics of the accreditation of forensic organizations as required by GOST ISO/IEC 17025-2019 “General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories”.
The following scientific methods have been used in the study: dialectical, observation, description, comparison, analysis and synthesis, classification. A comparative analysis of the Guidelines in the 2014 and 2022 editions has been carried out. The authors have revealed the need for studying methodological recommendations reflecting the modules of the forensic expert process, contributing to the correct and accurate application of the requirements of GOST ISO/IEC 17025-2019 in the accreditation of forensic expert organizations in the Eurasian area. They also describe risk handling procedures in forensic expert activities and their impact on improving the efficiency of forensic expert processes.
About the Authors
G. G. Omelyanyuk
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University); Bauman Moscow State Technical University (BMSTU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Omel’yanyuk Georgii Georgievich – Doctor of Law, Candidate of Biology, Professor, Deputy Director; Professor of the Department of Forensic Operations, Institute of Law; Professor of the Digital Forensics Department
Moscow 109028
Moscow 117198
Moscow 105055
E. V. Chesnokova
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Chesnokova Elena Vladimirovna – Doctor of Law, Head of the Forensic Research Methodology Department; Associate Professor of the Department of Forensic Operations, Institute of Law
Moscow 109028
Moscow 117198
B. M. Bishmanov
Russian Federation
Bishmanov Bukenbai Muratzhanovich – Doctor of Law, Professor
References
1. Smirnova S.A., Usov A.I., Omeljanuk G.G., Bebeshko G.I., Korol S.G. Practice of Accreditation of Forensic Laboratories of the Ministry of Justice of Russia on Compliance with ISO/MEK 17025. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2011. No. 2 (22). P. 40–56. (In Russ.).
2. Panhwar A., Naeem M.A., Zainulibad S., Ahmed M., Haq A., Haq S. Laboratory Quality Improvement by ISO/IEC-17025 Accreditation: A Case Study of PCSIR. International Journal of Current Research. 2020. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 9942–9945.
3. Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I., Zinin A.M. Forensic Theory (Forensic Expertology) / E.R. Rossinskaya (ed.). 2nd ed. Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M, 2016. 368 p. (In Russ.).
4. Zhong Zh. Practical Straits of the Forensic Examination. Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine. 2016. Vol. 2. No. 1 P. 33–38. https://doi.org/10.4103/2349-5014.175615
5. Kelty S.F., Robertson J., Julian R. Beyond Technical Training to Professionalism in Crime Scene Examination: Enhancing Cognitive, Leadership, and Social Abilities in Career Development Programs. Forensic Science Policy & Management. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 3–4. P. 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409044.2017.1370039
6. Mateen R.M., Tariq A. Crime Scene Investigation in Pakistan: A Perspective. Forensic Science International: Synergy. 2019. Vol. 1. P. 285–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.06.046
7. Chesnokova E.V. Expert (Specialist) Engagement in Crime Scene Examination in Context of International Standards. Legislation. 2020. No. 11. P. 70–76. (In Russ.).
8. Smirnova S.A., Omeljanuk G.G., Usov A.I., Bebeshko G.I. Special Considerations in Applying the Key and Definitions of the International Standard GOST ISO/IEC 17025-2009 in Forensic Science Laboratories. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2012. No. 2 (26). P. 56– 67. (In Russ.).
9. Chesnokova E.V. Correspondence between the Terms and Definitions of the International Standard ISO 21043-1-2018 and Terminology Developed by National Forensic Expertology. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 44–49. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-1-44-49
10. Bali A.S., Edmond G., Ballantyne K.N., Kemp R.I., Martire K.A. Communicating Forensic Science Opinion: An Examination of Expert Reporting Practices. Science & Justice. 2020. Vol. 60. No. 3. P. 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2019.12.005
11. Smirnova S.A., Bebeshko G.I., Lyubetskaya I.P., Omel’yanyuk G.G., Usov A.I. Probability-Based Validation of the Forensic Method “Microscopic Analysis of Textile Fibers”. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 2. P. 92–99. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-2-92-99
12. Chesnokova E.V. On the Development of Working with Personnel in Forensic Organizations under the Requirements of the International Standard ISO/IEC 17025:2017. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 75–83. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-1-75-83
13. Omeljanuk G.G., Usov A.I. Risk Management in Forensic Activities as a Way to Improve the Quality of Expert Proceedings // The Development of Criminalistics and Forensic Science in the Works of Professor E.R. Rossinskaya: Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the Anniversary of the Scientist, Expert, Teacher. Moscow: Prospekt, 2019. P. 337–343. (In Russ.).
14. Howes L.M. Trends and Issues in the Communication of Forensic Science. Forensic Science International. 2019. Vol. 304. 109967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109967
15. Boldyrev I.V. ISO/IEC 17025:2017. Practical Recommendations for Application. St. Petersburg: Profession, 2018. 128 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Omelyanyuk G.G., Chesnokova E.V., Bishmanov B.M. Possibilities of Applying the ILAC-G19:06/2022 Manual “Modules in the Forensic Process” to Improve Forensic Activities. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2022;17(3):70-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-3-70-79
Views:
656
Email this article 