Tapping the Potential of the Molecular Genetic Expert Research of Objects of Animal Origin in the Fight against Their Illegal Trafficking

Currently, the legal framework for protecting natural resources from human assault is being developed at the international level. However, the statistical data on the sentencing of persons convicted on the territory of the Russian Federation under Articles 258 and 258.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in 2020 given in the article indicates: the crimes causing the reduction in the number of animal populations, and as a result, the loss of biodiversity, are challenging to prove; a small number of perpetrators are brought to criminal responsibility; punishment in the form of imprisonment is imposed only in isolated cases. However, using molecular genetic research methods for the biological material of wild animals, it is possible to fill in a significant part of the missing information or obtain new evidentiary information about the circumstances of crimes, including illegal hunting. The application of the DNA barcoding method, developed in the early 2000s, makes it possible to establish the taxonomic affiliation of living organisms when it is impossible to do this by classical methods, for example, if the organism is represented by a micro-number of biological tissues, and is also at the stages of the life cycle (egg, larva, embryo) with an insufficient number of morphological features. Thus, advanced DNA technologies allow us to obtain a considerable amount of previously inaccessible information.

The issue of the illegal wild animal trafficking sold as “raised in captivity” is relevant for the pet industry and zoos and has implications both for animal welfare and the preservation of the natural environment. Methods based on the DNA analysis can also be applied for solving problems related to establishing the source of origin of the animal, in some cases – its habitat. The article provides cases from expert practice of ANO “Amur Tiger” when using molecular genetic methods of wild animal analysis allowed solving investigative and judicial tasks.

1. Shchelkanov M.Yu., Galkina I.V., Aramilev S.V., Surovyi A.L., Fomenko P.V., Zhuravlev Yu.N. Far Eastern Bank of Biological Materials (FE BBM) from Big Cats (Pantherinae) as an Improvement Tool of the Practice of Enforcement of Articles 226.1 and 258.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Criminology. 2017. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 146–153. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2017.11(1).146-153

2. Smirnova S.A., Omel’yanyuk G.G., Gulevskaya V.V., Perfilova T.V., Nikulina M.V. Wildlife Forensics: Current State and Development Perspectives in the Russian Federation. (In Russ.). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 84–93. https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-1-84-93

3. Hanley N., Mikac K.M. Wildlife Crime in Croatia. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology. 2020. Vol. 16. P. 702–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-020-00293-6

4. Omel’yanyuk G.G., Khaziev Sh.N., Gulevskaya V.V. Forensic Assistance in the Investigation of Crimes against Tigers. Theory andPractice of Forensic Science. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 18–26. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-2-18-26

5. Aramilev S.V., Kiseleva E.S., Fomenko P.V. Forensic Investigation of Crimes Against the Amur Tiger and Other Animals: Problems and Solutions. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 105–109. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-3-105-109

6. Smirnova S.A., Omel’yanyuk G.G., Storozhenko I.V., Rybakova A.A., Gulevskaya V.V. Forensic Molecular-Genetic Analysis of Objects of Biological Origin – a New Direction of Forensic Activity of the Russian Ministry of Justice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 6–18. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-1-6-18

7. Butler J.M. Non-human DNA. In: Butler J.M. (Ed). Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Methodology. Academic Press, 2011. P. 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374513-2.00016-6

8. Sensabaugh G., Kaye D.H. Non-human DNA Evidence. Jurimetrics. 1998. Vol. 38. No. 1. P. 1–16. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29762581

9. D’Andrea F., Fridez F., Coquoz R. Preliminary Experiments on the Transfer of Animal Hair During Simulated Criminal Behavior. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 1998. Vol. 43. No. 6. P. 1257–1258. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS14399J

10. Hebert P.D.N., Cywinska A., Ball Sh.L., De-Waard J.R. Biological Identifications Through DNA Barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences. 2003. Vol. 270. No. 1512. P. 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218

11. Shekhovtsov S.V., Shekhovtsova I.N., Peltek S.E. DNA Barcoding: Methods and Approaches. Advances in Modern Biology. 2019. Vol. 139. No .3. P. 211–220. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0042132419030074

12. Shneyer V.S. DNA Barcoding of Animal and Plant Species as an Approach for Their Molecular Identification and Describing of Diversity. Journal of General Biology. 2009. Vol. 70. No. 4. P. 296–315. (In Russ.).

13. Vincent S., Robyn S.C., Alfried P.V., George K.R., Richard L. Towards Writing the Encyclopedia of Life: An Introduction to DNA Barcoding. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences. 2005. Vol. 360. P. 1805–1811. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1730

14. Staudacher K., Wallinger C., Schallhart N., Traugott M. Detecting Ingested Plant DNA in Soil-Living Insect Larvae. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2011. Vol. 43. No. 2. P. 346–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.10.022

15. Etzler F.E., Wanner K.W., Morales-Rodriguez A., Ivie M.A. DNA Barcoding to Improve the Species-level Management of Wireworms (Coleoptera:Elateridae). Journal of EconomicEntomology. 2014. Vol. 107. No. 4. P. 1476–1485. http://doi.org/10.1603/EC13312

16. Tsybovsky I.S., Kotova S.A., Zabavskaya T.V., Spivak E.A., Lukashkova O.N. DNA Identification of Biological Traces in Forensic Casework for Investigation of Illegal Hunting in Belarus. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 116–123. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-4-116-123

17. McCord B.R., Gauthier Q., Cho S., Roig M.N., Gibson-Daw G.C., Young B., Taglia F., Zapico S.C., Mariot R.F., Lee S.B., Dunca G. Forensic DNA Analysis. Analytical Chemistry. 2019. Vol. 91. No. 1. P. 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05318

18. Masters A., Ogden R., Wetton J.H., Dawnay N. Defining End User Requirements for a Field-Based Molecular Detection System for Wildlife Forensic Investigations. Forensic Science International. 2019. Vol. 301. P. 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.041

19. Barmintseva A.E., Mugue N.S. The Use of Microsatellite Loci for Identification of Sturgeon Species (Acipenseridae) and Hybrid Forms. Russian Journal of Genetics. 2013. Vol. 49. No. 9. P. 1093–1105. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795413090032

20. Rozhnov V.V., Lukarevskiy V.S., Sorokin P.A. Application of Molecular Genetic Characteristics for Reintroduction of the Leopard (Panthera Pardus L., 1758) in the Caucasus. Doklady Biological Sciences. 2011. Vol. 437. 2011. P. 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012496611020062

21. Yan D., Luo J.Y., Han Y.M., Peng C., Dong X.P., Chen S.L., Sun L.G., Xiao X.H. Forensic DNA Barcoding and Bio-Response Studies of Animal Horn Products Used in Traditional Medicine. PLOS ONE. 2013. Vol. 8 No. 2. e55854. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055854

22. Sugimoto T., Nagata J., Aramilev V.V., Belozor A., Higashi S., McCullough D. Species and Sex Identification from Faecal Samples of Sympatric Carnivores, Amur Leopard and Siberian Tiger, in the Russian Far East. Conservation Genetics. 2006. Vol. 7. P. 799–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9071-z

23. Winters M., Torkelson A., Booth R., Mailand C., Hoareau Y., Tucker S., Wasser S.K. Isolation of DNA from Small Amounts of Elephant Ivory: Sampling the Cementum with Total Demineralization Extraction. Forensic Science International. 2018. No. 288. P. 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.036

24. Summerell A.E., Frankham G.J., Gunn P., Johnson R.N. DNA Based Method for Determining Source Country of the Short Beaked Echidna (Tachyglossusaculeatus) in the Illegal Wildlife Trade. Forensic Science International. 2019. No. 295. P. 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.11.019

25. Morgan K.I., Ewart K.M., Nguyen T.Q., Sitam F.T., Ouitavon K., Lightson A.L., Kotze A., McEwing R. Avoiding Common Numts to Provide Reliable Species Identification for Tiger Parts // Forensic Science International: Reports. 2020. No. 3. 100166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100166

26. Wan Q.H., Fang S.G. Application of Species-Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Forensic Identification of Tiger Species. Forensic Science International. 2003. Vol. 131. No. 1. P. 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00398-5

27. ÁngelPardo M., Jiméneza E., Viðarssonb J.R., Ólafssonb K., Ólafsdóttirb G., Daníelsdóttirb A.K., Pérez-Villareala B. DNA Barcoding Revealing Mislabeling of Seafood in European Mass Caterings. Food Control. 2018. Vol. 92. P. 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.04.044