Application of Specialized Knowledge When Considering Cases on Challenging the Results of Determining the Cadastral Value of Real Estate Objects
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-3-41-50
Abstract
The article addresses theoretical and normative frameworks and the practice of applying specialized knowledge in trials of cases on challenging the results of determining the cadastral value of real estate objects. The authors establish the elements of specialized knowledge necessary for forensic experts when conducting examinations of this category. It is noted that the change in the volume and structure of specialized knowledge is influenced by the tasks that are assigned to an expert. It is also the case when determining the market value of real estate objects when considering administrative cases on challenging the cadastral value. The specialized knowledge applied by experts in determining the market value of construction objects and land plots can be presented as a system that includes such structural elements of a knowledgeable person’s competence as expertise, competencies, and professional skills. Finally, the authors outline the problems leading, on the one hand, to the increased burden on the forensic expert and extension of the terms of examinations and, on the other hand, the financial burden on the person who appointed an examination.
About the Authors
Andrei Yu. Butyrin
National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering; The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Butyrin Andrey Yur'evich – Doctor of Law, Professor of the Department of Construction Organization and Real Estate Management of the National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering; Head of the Laboratory of Forensic Construction Expertise of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation
Moscow 129337; Moscow 109028
Kristina A. Kolmakova
Voronezh Legal College; Law Firm “Shlabovich, Tatarovich and Partners”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kolmakova Kristina Aleksandrovna – teacher of the Voronezh Regional State Educational Institution “Voronezh Legal College”; lawyer of the Law Firm “Shlabovich, Tatarovich and Partners”
Voronezh 394042; Voronezh 394042
References
1. Rossinskaya E.R. Forensic Examination in Civil, Arbitrary, Administrative and Criminal Proceedings. Monograph. 4th ed. Moscow: Norma: Infra- M, 2018. 576 p. (In Russ.).
2. Patrakova I.I. Classification of Conflict of Laws: History and Contemporaneity. History of State and Law. 2010. No. 10. P. 16–19. (In Russ.).
3. Orlov Yu.K. Forensic Examination As a Means of Proof in Criminal Proceedings. Moscow: IPK RFTsSE, 2005. 264 p. (In Russ.).
4. Koruhov Yu.G., Orlov Yu.K., Orlova V.F. (Eds.). Comment on Federal Law “On the State Forensic Expert Activity in the Russian Federation”. Moscow: Prospect, 2002. 192 p. (In Russ.).
5. Butyrin A.Yu. Theory and Practice of Construction Forensics. Moscow: Gorodets, 2006. 544 p. (In Russ.).
6. Butyrin A.Yu., Stativa E.B. Identification Objectives in Construction Forensics. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2015. No. 2 (38). P. 13–18. (In Russ.).
7. Treushnikov M.K. Forensic Evidence. Moscow: Gorodets, 1997. 320 p. (In Russ.).
8. Petrov K.L., Butyrin A.Yu., Grigor’ev I.A., Grigoryan V.G., Koshelev D.M., Lysenko N.V., Makeev A.V., Nersesyan M.G., Psheradovskii A.V., Selivanov A.A., Fedotov S.V. Basics of Determining the Value in the Framework of Forensic Activities. Vol. 1. Legal and Practical Aspects. Study Guide / S.A. Smirnova (ed.). Moscow: RFCFS, 2019. 172 p. (In Russ.).
9. Petrov K.L., Butyrin A.Yu., Grigor’ev I.A., Grigoryan V.G., Koshelev D.M., Lysenko N.V., Makeev A.V., Nersesyan M.G., Psheradovskii A.V., Selivanov A.A., Fedotov S.V. Basics of Determining the Value in the Framework of Forensic Activities. Vol. 2. Theoretical Foundations. Study Guide / S.A. Smirnova (ed.). Moscow: RFCFS, 2019. 455 p. (In Russ.).
10. Petrov K.L., Butyrin A.Yu., Grigor’ev I.A., Grigoryan V.G., Koshelev D.M., Lysenko N.V., Makeev A.V., Nersesyan M.G., Psheradovskii A.V., Selivanov A.A., Fedotov S.V. Basics of Determining the Value in the Framework of Forensic Activities. Vol. 3. Examination of Evaluation Reports and Other Documents Containing Information on the Previously Performed Cost Determination. Study Guide / S.A. Smirnova (ed.). Moscow: RFCFS, 2019. 172 p. (In Russ.).
11. Petrov K.L., Butyrin A.Yu., Grigor’ev I.A., Grigoryan V.G., Koshelev D.M., Lysenko N.V., Makeev A.V., Nersesyan M.G., Psheradovskii A.V., Selivanov A.A., Fedotov S.V. Basics of Determining the Value in the Framework of Forensic Activities. Vol. 4. Dictionary of the Main Terms of Forensic Cost Evaluation. Study Guide / S.A. Smirnova (ed.). Moscow: RFCFS, 2019. 207 p. (In Russ.).
12. Skachkova M.E., Shmidt M.V. Land Management Expertise As a Tool Land Disputes Resolving. Land Management, Monitoring and Cadastre. 2013. No. 4 (100). P. 62–67. (In Russ.).
13. Abushenko D.B. Comissioning of Examination in Administrative Proceedings: Some Speculations on Peculiarities of Origination of an Elementary Procedural Legal Relation. Administrative Law and Procedure. 2018. No. 3. P. 58–62. (In Russ.).
14. Strel’tsova A. Real Estate Evaluation: Establishing the Cadastral Value of a Land Plot Equal to the Market Value. Housing Law. 2015. No. 11. P. 51–61. (In Russ.).
15. Dyakonova O.G. Court Expertise and Property Valuation: Problems of Delineation and Legislative Regulation. Russian Juridical Journal. 2018. No. 1. P. 155–166. (In Russ.).
16. Kartsev P.V. Guidance Notes on the Preparation of Valuation Reports for Assessment Appeals Purpose. Property Relations in Russian Federation. 2015. No. 4. P. 6–17. (In Russ.).
17. Leifer L.A. (Ed.). Real Estate Appraiser’s Guide-2020. Land Plots. Part 1. Territorial Characteristics and Correction Factors for the Local Siting. The Full Version. Nizhny Novgorod: Inform-Otsenka, 2020. 278 p. (In Russ.).
18. Leifer L.A. (Ed.). Real Estate Appraiser’s Guide-2020. Land Plots. Part 2. Object’s Physical Characteristics. Characteristics Reflecting Object’s Functional Purposes. Transferable Property Rights. Discounts on the Auction. The Capitalization Ratio. The Full Version Nizhny Novgorod: Inform-Otsenka, 2020. 312 p. (In Russ.).
19. Leifer L.A. (Ed.). Real Estate Appraiser’s Guide-2020. Office and Retail Real Estate and Similar Types of Objects. Current and Forecast Market Characteristics for the Revenue Approach. The Full Version. Nizhny Novgorod: Inform-Otsenka, 2020. 450 p. (In Russ.).
20. Leifer L.A. (Ed.). Real Estate Appraiser’s Guide-2020. Office and Retail Real Estate and Similar Types of Objects. Adjustment Factors and Discounts for the Comparative Approach. The Full Version. Nizhny Novgorod: Inform-Otsenka, 2020. 450 p. (In Russ.).
21. Garrett B.L. The Constitutional Regulation of Forensic Evidence. Washington and Lee Law Review. 2016. Vol. 73. 25 p.
Review
For citations:
Butyrin A.Yu., Kolmakova K.A. Application of Specialized Knowledge When Considering Cases on Challenging the Results of Determining the Cadastral Value of Real Estate Objects. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021;16(3):41-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-3-41-50
Views:
933
Email this article 