Some Features of Diagnostic Research of Short Handwriting Objects Performed in the Armenian Language
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-2-116-121
Abstract
The article discusses a specific area of handwriting expertise – research of the completed short notes with deliberately changed handwriting. The author emphasizes that the expertise of these objects due to their small volume is a highly complex identification problem. The article pays special attention to short notes made in the Armenian language, highlighting and describing their specific features such as the degree of compression, slowing down the pace of movement with an unreasonable stop of the writing instrument, presence of blunt initial and final strokes. The slant is an essential factor in expert research of the short notes performed with the deliberate change of writing. Also, the change in the tempo leads to a sharp simplification of letter structures and incomplete execution of letter elements; simultaneously, complications of individual letters or their elements can be observed. The author analyzes all these statements in-depths using specific examples.
About the Author
M. A. Aloyan
National Bureau of Expertises of National Academy of Science of the Republic of Armenia
Armenia
Armenia
Aloyan Margarita Arutyunovna – Head of Handwriting, Authorship and Document Expertises Department
Yerevan 0004
References
1. Oganyan L.P. Criminalistics. Textbook for Higher Educational Institutions. Erevan: Tigran Mets, 2004. 504 p. (In Russ.).
2. Dubovik E.S. The Current State of Forensic Research of Manuscripts Made in Foreign Languages. Vestnik of St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2013. No. 2 (58). P. 111–114. (In Russ.).
3. Forensic Handwriting Analysis. Special Part: Investigation of Handwritten Texts. 2nd ed. Mos-cow: Nauka, 2007. 341 p. (In Russ.).
4. Orlova V.F. Forensic Handwriting Diagnostics. 2nd ed. Moscow: Nauka, 2006. 207 p. (In Russ.).
5. Kupriyanova A.A. Methodology for Solving of Forensic Handwriting Diagnostic Tasks. Mos-cow: Nauka, 2006. 64 p. (In Russ.).
6. Bogachkina G.R., Orlova V.F., Prasolova E.M., Sobko G.M., Stribul’ T.I., Trubnikova V.A., Vul S.M. Application of Research Methods Based on Probalistic Modeling in Forensic Handwriting Examination. Methodological Guide. Moscow, 1976. 360 p. (In Russ.).
7. Orlova V.F. (Ed.). Forensic Handwriting Examination. Special Part. Analysis of Small-Volume Handwriting Objects. 2nd ed. Moscow: EKOM, 2011. 537 p. (In Russ.).
8. Bobovkin M.V., Ruchkin V.A. On the Development of Forensic Handwriting Examination. Expert-Criminalist. 2018. No. 3. P. 25–28. (In Russ.).
9. Seregin V.V. (Ed.). Graphology and Handwriting Analysis. Course of Lectures. 5th ed. Saint Petersburg: MVD Rossii, NPSEP, 2015. 229 p. (In Russ.).
10. Vardanyan A. Peculiarities of Psychological Analysis of Handwriting within the Framework of Forensic Psychological Expertise. Armenian Journal of Forensic Expertise and Criminalistics. 2019. No. 2. P. 130–133. (In Armenian).
11. Aloyan M.A. Consistency of Common and Private Features of Signatures Made by Common Symptoms of Persons of Elderly and Senile Age with Certain Diseases. Bulwark of Law. 2017. No. 3. P. 109–121. (In Armenian).
12. Baklachyan A. Several Features of Study of Handwritings or Signatures Made in an Unusual Conditions and on Unusual Material. Armenian Journal of Forensic Expertise and Criminalistics. 2020. No. 3. P. 27–32. (In Armenian).
13. Aloyan M., Baklachyan A. The Features of Comparison of the Examination of the Samples Made by Deliberatly Changed Handwriting and the Samples Made by Unchanged Handwriting with the Examined Written Records. Armenian Journal of Forensic Expertise and Criminalistics. 2019. No. 2. P. 93–98. (In Armenian).
14. Aloyan M.A. Investigation of Manuscripts, Performed with the Deliberately Changed Handwriting. State and Law. 2012. No. 4 (58). P. 111–117. (In Russ.).
15. Govorkova E.Yu. Some Features of the Methodology for Research of Documents Performed with an Altered Handwriting. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod. 2016. No. 1. P. 120–125. (In Russ.).
16. Smirnov A.V., Yakovleva E.V. Technique for Determining the Fact of Making Short Notes in a Deliberately Changed Cursive Handwriting. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2007. No. 4 (8). P. 129–141. (In Russ.).
17. Yumatov V.A., Remizova V.A. Features of the Analysis of the Pressure Characteristics of Signatures and Short Notes. Actual Problems of Forensic Expert Activity in Criminal, Civil, Arbitration Proceedings and in Cases of Administrative Offenses. Materials of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference (Ufa, November 9, 2018). Ufa: RITs BashGU, 2018. P. 206–211 (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Aloyan M.A. Some Features of Diagnostic Research of Short Handwriting Objects Performed in the Armenian Language. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021;16(2):116-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-2-116-121
Views:
572
Email this article 