Psychological Analysis of Audio and Video Materials Obtained during Police Operations: Organizational and Methodical Aspects
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-2-105-115
Abstract
The article addresses typical expert situations arising in the psychological analysis of video materials from police operations. The author demonstrates that to solve the emerging issues, an expert needs specialized knowledge, especially in forensic psychology and linguistics. Furthermore, the efficiency of solving expert tasks in examining video materials of police operations for various categories of detected offenses depends on some organizational and methodological factors. The author also reviews typical expert errors associated with an incorrect recognition of the object of research, the outline of expert tasks, the choice of methods, and the limitations in the use of case materials by experts.
About the Author
T. N. Sekerazh
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sekerazh Tat’yana Nikolaevna – Candidate of Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Forensic Psychology
Moscow 109028
References
1. Sekerazh T.N. Current Capacities of Forensic Psychological and Comprehensive Analysis When Examining Footage of Procedural and Non-Procedural Actions. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 100–113. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-1-100-113
2. Plotnikova A.M., Kuznetsov V.O., Sazhenin I.I., Akulenko E.V. Boitsov A.A., Gubarenkova E.O., Kryuk E.K., Kumkova T.N., Portnova V.B., Chumakova E.N. In: Smirnova S.A. (Ed.) Semantic Analysis in Forensic Linguistics. Methodical Guide. Moscow: RFCFS, 2018. 136 p. (In Russ.).
3. Bezyaeva M.G. Semantics of the Communicative Level of the Sounding Language. The Expression of the Speaker’s Will and Desire in the Russian Dialogue. Moscow: MGU, 2002. 751 p. (In Russ.).
4. Nazarova T.V., Grimailo E.A., Mamaev N.Yu., Korshikov A.P., Rostovskaya A.V. In: Dil’din Yu.M., Martynov V.V. (Eds). Standard Expert Techniques for the Study of Physical Evidence. Part 1. Moscow: Interkrim-press, 2010. P. 243–292. (In Russ.).
5. Kuznetsov S.A. (Ed.) The Great Defining Dictionary of the Russian Language. Saint Peters-burg: Norint, 2000. 1536 p. (In Russ.).
6. Sekerazh T.N. Forensic Psychological Aspects of the Term “Provocation” in Criminal Proceedings. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 19–33. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-3-19-33
7. Kuznetsov V.O. “Provocation” as an Expert Term in Forensic Linguistics. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 6–18. https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-3-6-18
8. Pavlova N.D., Grebenshchikova T.A. Introspection: Bases, Procedure, Usage Experience. Moscow: In-t psikhologii RAN, 2017. 151 p. (In Russ.).
9. Zhuravlev A.L., Pavlova N.D. (Eds.). Psychological Impact: Mechanisms, Strategies, Coping Capacities. Moscow: In-t psikhologii RAN, 2012. 368 p. (In Russ.).
10. Wooffitt R. Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis. A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London: SAGE Publication, 2005. 245 p.
11. Parker I. Critical Discursive Psychology. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. 303 p. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137505279
12. Sekerazh T.N., Kuznetsov V.O. (Eds.). The Compilation of Expert’s Conclusions after Results of Psychological Forensic Examination of Informational Materials, Psychological and Linguistic Forensic Examination. Practical Guide for Experts. Moscow: RFCFS, 2020. 516 p. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/978-5-91133-207-5-2020-6
13. Safuanov F.S., Kalashnikova A.S. Methodological Bases for the Conduct of Forensic Psychological Evaluations in Absentia and Post-Mortem in Civil Proceedings (Based on Case File). Methodological Recommendations. Moscow: RFCFS, 2011. 61 p. (In Russ.).
14. Gradusova O.B., Kuz’min S.A. Probability Interpretation of Forensic Evidence. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 4. P. 27–33. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-4-6-11
15. Belousov K.I. Strategies of Structuring Thematic Space of Text. Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology. 2014. No. 4 (28). P. 15–25. (In Russ.).
16. Belousov K.I. Experimental Linguistics and Network Science. Socio-Psycho-Linguistic Research. 2014. No. 2. P. 21–31. (In Russ.).
17. Smirnova S.A., Kuznetsov V.O., Plotnikova A.M. (Eds.). Linguistic Forensic Examination of Dialogic Speech. Teaching Guide. Moscow: RFCFS, 2020. 120 p. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/978-5-91133-215-0-2020-10
18. Dotsenko E.L. Manipulation: Phenomena, Mechanisms and Resistance. Moscow: Rech’, 2003. 304 p. (In Russ.).
19. Kabachenko T.S. Methods of Psychological Impact. Moscow: Pedagogicheskoe obshchestvo Rossii, 2000. 539 p. (In Russ.).
20. Latynov V.V. Psychology of Communicative Impact. Moscow: In-t psikhologii RAN, 2013. 368 p. (In Russ.).
21. Markosyan A.S., Leont’ev D.A., Sorokin Yu.A. (Eds.). Applied Psycholinguistics of Speech and Mass Communication. Moscow: Smysl, 2008. 271 p. (In Russ.).
22. Stepanov V.N. Provoking in Social and Mass Communication. Monograph. Saint Peters-burg: Roza mira, 2008. 268 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Sekerazh T.N. Psychological Analysis of Audio and Video Materials Obtained during Police Operations: Organizational and Methodical Aspects. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021;16(2):105-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-2-105-115
Views:
893
Email this article 