Building of Knowledge on Standardization of Forensic Expert Activities in Russia
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-1-141-151
Abstract
Basing on the analysis of historical events and achievements in forensic science, the author proposes a periodization for the building of knowledge on the standardization in forensic activities in Russia. The author also shows that implementation of the standardization in forensic activities and the development of appropriate practical procedures were critically influenced by the isolation of the Soviet system and subsequent stable scientific and practical international contacts; improvement of the regulatory framework of forensic activities, standardization, and technical regulation in the Russian Federation; continuity of the domestic Soviet science and practice in forensic expertise. For a holistic understanding of the functioning of all the tools and mechanisms of standardization at different stages of the evolution of forensic expertise, the author proposes to develop a model of a subtheory of standartization for forensic expert activity and implement it.
About the Author
E. V. Chesnokova
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Chesnokova Elena Vladimirovna – Candidate of Law, Deputy Head of the Forensic Research Methodology Department in the system of forensic institutions of the Russian Ministry of Justice; Academic Secretary of the Joint Dissertation Board
Moscow 109028
Moscow 117198
References
1. Kolosova V.M. On the System of Spectrographic Examination of Objects of Forensic Examination for the Identification Purpose. Expert Technique. 1963. Issue 1-2. P. 7–10. (In Russ.)
2. Ovsyannikov I.V. Problems of Formulating and Using Prospective Conclusions of Expert Opinion. News of Higher Educational Institutions. Legal Studies. 1998. No. 1 (220). P. 93–97. (In Russ.)
3. Edzhubov L.G., Brudovskii B.S. A Quantitative Method for Determining the Suitability of Papillary Traces for Identification. In: The Use of Computers in the Forensic Research and the Search for Legal Information. Collection of Scientific Works of VNIISE. Issue 15. Moscow: VNIISE, 1975. P. 121–143. (In Russ.)
4. Orlov Yu.K. Concepts of Probabilities and Possibilities in Expert Research. In: Questions of the Theory of Forensic Examination. Collection of Scientific Works of VNIISE. Issue 39. Moscow: VNIISE, 1979. P. 49–82. (In Russ.)
5. Orlov Yu.K. Forms of Conclusions in an Expert’s Report. Methodical Guide. Moscow: VNIISE, 1981. 162 p. (In Russ.)
6. Ustinov A.I., Sonis M.A. On Standardization of Methods in Forensic Expertise. In: Korukhov Yu.G (ed). Current Issues of Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. Collection of Scientific Works. Moscow: VNIISE, 1989. P. 96– 106. (In Russ.)
7. Rokitskii P.F. Basics of Variation Statistics for Biologists. Minsk: Belgosuniversitet, 1961. 222 p. (In Russ.)
8. Granovskii G.L. Theoretical Issues of Programming of Trasological Expertise. In: Programmed and Situational Methods of Trasological Research. Collection of Scientific Works. Issue 37. Moscow: VNIISE, 1979. P. 3–31. (In Russ.)
9. Vedeneev V.V., Dyuzhaev A.V., Serpak A.N., Chubchenko A.L. Tactics of Detection and Detention of Stolen Vehicles. A Methodological Guide. 2nd ed. Moscow: EKTs MVD Rossii, 1994. 68 p. (In Russ.)
10. Lyutov V.P., Mitrichev L.S., Nagaitsev A.A., Pushnov A.V., Starikov E.V., Chalkin P.P., Chubchenko A.L. Memo on Signs of Forgery of Driver’s Documents, Marking Data of Passenger Cars and Methods of Their Detection. Moscow: VNII MVD SSSR, 1989. 56 p. (In Russ.)
11. Korukhov Yu.G. (ed). Fundamentals of Forensic Science. Part 1. General Theory. Moscow: RFCFS, 1997. 430 p. (In Russ.)
12. Levitskii A.B., Molokov E.P., Seregin V.V. The Method of Probabilistic and Statistical Evaluation of Matching Handwriting Features in Capital Letters of the Russian Alphabet: Textbook. Moscow: EKTs MVD Rossii, 1996. 336 p. (In Russ.)
13. Jakobs L.E.M.P., Sprangers W.J.J.M. A European View on Forensic Expertise and CounterExpertise. Criminal Law Forum. 2000. Vol. 11. No. 3. P. 375–392.
14. Fadeev S.P. Fundamentals of Standardizing in the Forensic Medicine. Problems of Expertise in Medicine. 2002. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 3–5. (In Russ.)
15. Smirnova S.A., Zamaraeva N.A. Opportunities for Technical Regulation of Forensic Science Services in the Russian Federation. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2015. No. 1. P. 46–50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2015-1-46-50
16. Orlova V.F. Legislative Regulation of Forensic Examination: Current State and Ways of Improvement. Forensic Examination. 2004. No. 1. P. 12–14. (In Russ.)
17. Orlov Yu.K. Procedural Issues of Forensic Examination. Forensic Examination. 2004. No. 1. P. 21–22. (In Russ.)
18. Rossinskaya E.R. Issues of Improving the Legislation on Forensic Expertise. Forensic Examination. 2004. No. 1. P. 25–38. (In Russ.)
19. Omelyanyuk G.G. Legal Regulation of the Conduct of Forensic Examination by Non-State Forensic Experts. Forensic Examination. 2004. No. 1. P. 45–48. (In Russ.)
20. Kolkutin V.V., Pinchuk P.V., Vasnetsova O.A. On the Selection of Experts for the Analysis of the Competitiveness of Hardware and Technical Means for Conducting Forensic Examinations. Problems of Expertise in Medicine. 2005. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 5–8. (In Russ.)
21. Dixon L.A., Murray C.M., Archer E.J., Dobbins A.E., Koumi P., Gill P. Validation of a 21-Locus Autosomal SNP Multiplex for Forensic Identification Purposes. Forensic Science International. 2005. Vol. 154. No. 1. P. 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.12.011
22. Smirnova S.A. (ed). Multimodal Edition “Forensic Science: Reboot”. Part 2. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Theory of Forensic Science. Moscow: Ekom, 2012. 456 p. (In Russ.)
23. Usov A.I., Omelianyuk G.G. Possibilities of Accreditation of Laboratories of Forensic Institutions of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation for Compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2009. No. 2 (14). P. 54–56. (In Russ.)
24. Usov A.I., Omel’yanyuk G.G., Lamukhina O.A. Availability of the International Standards for Forensic Examiners Activities in the Russian Federation. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2009. No. 3 (15). P. 56–62. (In Russ.)
25. Omel’yanyuk G.G. On the Issue of Validation of Forensic Methods. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2010. № 2 (18). С. 64–68. (In Russ.)
26. Omel’yanyuk G.G. Experience of Voluntary Certification of Non-State Forensic Experts in the Field of Environmental Forensics in the System ROSS RU.B175.040Э00. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2006. № 2 (2). P. 68–71. (In Russ.)
27. Khatuntsev N.A, Karpukhina E.S. ENFSI Forensic IT Working Group Meeting «Information Technologies in Forensic Science», Rome, October 23–26, 2012. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2013. № 1 (29). P. 133–134. (In Russ.)
28. Sonis M.A. On the Methods of Forensic Ballistics. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2013. № 2 (30). С. 90. (In Russ.)
29. Chudievich A.R. Problems of Efficiency of Normative and Technical Regulation in Building. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2010. № 1 (17). С. 68–72. (In Russ.)
30. Smirnova S.A., Usov A.I., Omeljanuk G.G., Bebeshko G.I., Korol S.G. Practice of Accreditation of Forensic Laboratories of the Ministry of Justice of Russia on Compliance with ISO/MEK 17025. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2011. No. 2 (22). P. 40–56. (In Russ.)
31. Zamaraeva N.A. Implementing a Quality Management System at the North-Western Regional Center of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. № 3 (35). P. 142–145. (In Russ.)
32. Rēpele M., Alksne M., Čentoricka M. Accreditation of Forensic Science Organizations and Certification of Forensic Examiners in Latvia. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No. 1 (33). P. 28–34. (In Russ.)
33. Kinder J.D. Сosts of Validation and Accreditation. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No. 3 (35). P. 148–150. (In Russ.)
34. Smirnova S.A. Perspectives of Standardization at the Current Stage of Development of Forensic Expert Activities. In: Proceeding of International Scientific and Practical Conference “East-West: Partnership in Forensic Science: Topical Issues of Theory and Practice of Forensic Expertise” (Almaty, October 15, 2015). (In Russ.). http://www.zakon.kz/4752538-materialy-mezhdunarodnojj-nauchno.html
35. Chesnokova E.V., DuVal R.S. Addressing the Competence of Experts and Specialists in the Light of Provisions of ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and International Experience in Applying Specialized Knowledge. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 63–71. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-3-63-71
36. Usov A.I., Gradusova O.B., Kuz’min S.A. The Use of Probabilistic and Statistical Methods to Test the Significance of Scientific Evidence: Comparative Analysis of Current Forensic Practices in Russia and Abroad. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 6–15. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-4-6-15
37. Bebeshko G.I., Voytov S.A., Omelyanyuk G.G., Usov A.I. Applying Bayesian Methods for Metrological Evaluation and Interpretation of Forensic Evidence. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No. 1 (33). P. 148–158. (In Russ.)
38. Bebeshko G.I., Lyubetskaya I.P., Brunova L.P., Khanukaeva M.A., Omel’yanyuk G.G. Measuring Dyed Fiber Color with MSFU-K Microscope Spectrophotometer: Methodology Validation. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 71–80. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-2-71-80
39. Chesnokova E.V. The Process Approach in Forensic Activity as a Formalized Reflection of Its Stages and Algorithms. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 56– 65. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-4-56-65
40. Oznobishina E.A. Conducting Accreditation and Organizing the QMS (Quality Management System) in a Forensic Expert Institution within the Framework of GOST ISO/IEC 17025-2019. In: Collection of Scientific Papers of the International Conference “Actual Problems of Forensic Expert Activity” (Moscow, June 25, 2020). Moscow: Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V.Ya. Kikot, 2020. P. 189–194. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Chesnokova E.V. Building of Knowledge on Standardization of Forensic Expert Activities in Russia. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021;16(1):141-151. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-1-141-151
Views:
682
Email this article 