Preview

Theory and Practice of Forensic Science

Advanced search

Current Capacities of Forensic Psychological and Comprehensive Analysis When Examining Footage of Procedural and Non-Procedural Actions

https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-1-100-113

Abstract

The article addresses some typical situations arising in the course of a forensic psychological examination of footage when it is necessary to establish the following factual data: signs of the credibility of the information reported, spontaneity and preparedness of an interrogated person’s speech, external influence on the given testimony, the emotional state of the interrogated person and his/her psychological characteristics. The author analyses the situations that arise when examining the footage showing informal communication. The article also determines the range of tasks to solve which, the expert needs various specialized knowledge, primarily in the fields of forensic psychology and linguistics. Expert tasks occurring in forensic analysis of the footage of procedural and non-procedural actions depend on the case’s category, significance and procedural status of the footage in the evidentiary framework on the case, and some other factors. The author pays particular attention to the scope of expert competence for different specialties, including on the issues that cannot be solved by expert means at the current stage of scientific development.

About the Author

T. N. Sekerazh
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Sekerazh Tat’yana Nikolaevna – Candidate of Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Forensic Psychology

Moscow 109028



References

1. Sekerazh T.N., Kuznetsov V.O. Integrated Forensic Psycholinguistic Analysis: Forms, Types, Prospects of Development. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016. No. 4 (44). P. 98–107. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2016-4-98-107

2. Sekerazh Т.N. Psychological Analysis of Informational Materials: Establishing a New Type of Forensic Psychological Evaluation and a New Forensic Science Specialty. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 35–43. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-1-35-43

3. Sekerazh T.N. Expert Mistakes in Conduct of Forensic Psychological Expertise. In: Rossinskaya E.R. (ed). Forensic Expertise: Typical Mistakes. Moscow: Prospekt, 2012. P. 183–225. (In Russ.)

4. Volokhova L.A., Sekerazh T.N. Conducting Forensic Psychological Assessments Using Video Recordings of Search Operations and Investigative Actions (Overview of Forensic Practice). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2015. No. 4 (40). P. 88–97. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2015-4-88-97

5. Gagina O.V., Kuznetsov V.O. Forensic Analysis of the Content of Audio and Video Recordings Obtained During Investigation: Review of Current State and Future Prospects. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No. 1 (33). P. 45–48. (In Russ.)

6. Gagina O.V., Kuznetsov O.V., Sekerazh T.N. Psycho-linguistic Study of Interrogation Videos: Problems and Possible Solutions. Psychology and Law. 2015. No. 2. P. 93–104. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2015100207

7. Gagina O.V., Kuznetsov V.O. Methodology of Psychological and Linguistic Research of Video Footage of Proceedings: Influence on the Content of Statement. Moscow: RFCFS, 2020. 52 p. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/978-5-91133-203-7-2020-4

8. Dozortseva E.G., Krasavina A.G. Interviewing Child Victims of Crime: Changes in Investigative Practices. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2017. Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 23–31. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2017130304

9. Abramkina E.E. The Interview Memo Authorship Examination: Basic Special Aspects and the Method of the Analysis. Tomsk State University Journal. 2017. No. 415. P. 158–163. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/415/22

10. Smirnova S.A., Makushkin E.V., Asnis A.Ya., Vaske E.V., Dozortseva E.G., Safuanov F.S., Shishkov S.N., Shipshin S.S., Oshevskii D.S., Berdnikov D.V., Sekerazh T.N., Kalinina A.N. Information Letter “On the Issue of Legal Wrongfulness in Establishing Witness Credibility through Forensic Evaluation”. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016. No. 3 (43). P. 64–73. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2016-3-64-73

11. Smirnova S.A., Usov A.I. Enhancing the Scientific Validity of Methodological Support in Forensic Science: An Important International Trend. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. (In Russ.). 2017. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 11–17. https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-2-11-17

12. Vaske E.V. Methodology of an Investigator’s Psychological Interaction with a Minor during Interrogation. Practical Handbook. Nizhny Novgorod: SU SK RF po Nizhegorodskoi obl., 2013. 82 p. (In Russ.)

13. Vaske E.V. To the Question of Participation of a Specialist Psychologist in Preparation for and Carrying out of Interrogation of Minor Victim of Sexual Violence. Psychology and Law. 2012. Vol. 2. No. 2. (In Russ.). https://psyjournals.ru/psyandlaw/2012/n2/52072.shtml

14. Karpova A.V., Mikhaylova Yu.A., Chizhova D.S. Possibilities of a Psychological Analysis of the Testimonies of Juvenile Witnesses and Victims in Criminal Proceedings. Psychology and Law. 2019. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 174–186. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2019090413

15. Khitina M.V. Distinction of Spontaneous (Unprepared) and Prepared Oral Speech. Methodical Letter for Experts. Moscow: RFCFS, 2003. 52 p. (In Russ.)

16. Moskvina T.P. (ed). The Capacities of Conducting a Forensic Examination in State Forensic Institutions of the Russian Ministry of Justice. Moscow: Antidor, 2004. 501 p. (In Russ.)

17. Luriya A.R. Language and Mind / E.D. Khomskaya (ed). Moscow: MGU, 1979. 320 p. (In Russ.)

18. Leont’ev A.A. The Basics of Psycholinguistics. 3rd ed. Moscow: Smysl, Saint Petersburg: Lan’, 2003. 287 p. (In Russ.)

19. Leont’ev A.A. Language, Speech, Speech Activity. 3rd ed. Moscow: URSS, 2005. 211 p. (In Russ.)

20. Leongard K. Accentuating the Personality. Moscow: Feniks, 1989. 358 p. (In Russ.)

21. Naenko N.I. Mental Orientation. Moscow: MGU, 1976. 112 p. (In Russ.)

22. Nosenko E.L. The Features of Speech and States of Emotional Orientation. Dnepropetrovsk: DGU, 1975. 132 p. (In Russ.)

23. Dolinin K.A. Spontaneity and Non-Spontaneity as a Stylistic Characteristic. Statistics of the French Language. 2nd ed. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1987. P. 242–263. (In Russ.)

24. Walsh D., Oxburgh G., Redlich A., Myklebust T. (eds). International Developments and Practices in Investigative Interviewing and Interrogation. London: Routledge, 2017. 318 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315769677

25. Oxburgh G., Myklebust T., Grant T., Milne R. (eds). Communication in Investigative and Legal Contexts: Integrated Approaches from Forensic Psychology, Linguistics and Law Enforcement. Wiley-Blackwell, 2015. 402 p.

26. Ratinov A.R. Forensic Psychology for Investigators. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2001. 352 p. (In Russ.)

27. Ratinov A.R., Efimova N.I. Psychology of an Accused Interrogation. Handbook. Moscow: VNII problem ukrepleniya pravoporyadka, 1988. 114 p. (In Russ.)

28. Vaske E.V. Psychology of Minor Offenders’ and Sexual Abuse Victim’s Interrogation. Moscow: Genezis, 2014. 312 p. (In Russ.)

29. Kochenov M.M., Osipova N.R. Psychology of Minor Witnesses’ Interrogation. Handbook. Moscow: VIIPRMPP, 1984. 34 p. (In Russ.)

30. Melinder A., Scullin M., Gravvold T., Iversen M. The Stability and Generalizability of Young Children’s Suggestibility over a 44-month Interval. Psychology, Crime & Law. 2007. Vol. 13. No. 5. P. 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160601092997

31. Andrews S.J., Lamb M.E., Lyon T.D. The Effects of Question Repetition on Responses When Prosecutors and Defense Attorneys Question Children Alleging Sexual Abuse in Court. Law and Human Behavior. 2015. Vol. 39. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000152

32. Kebbell M., Deprez S., Wagstaff G. The Direct and Cross-Examination of Complainants and Defendants in Rape Trials: A Quantitative Analysis of Question Type. Psychology, Crime & Law. 2002. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160308139

33. Craig T. Memory Conformity and Suggestibility. Psychology, Crime and Law. 2013. Vol. 19. No. 7. P. 565–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.648637

34. Balabanova L.M. Forensic Abnormal Psychology. Donetsk: Stalker, 1998. 432 p. (In Russ.)

35. Comprehensive Forensic Psychological and Psychiatric Examination of the Minors’ Ability to Testify. Textbook for Doctors. Moscow: GNTs SSP im. V.P. Serbskogo Minzdrava Rossii, 1996. 20 p. (In Russ.)

36. Safuanov F.S. Forensic Psychology. Examination. Textbook for Academic Baccalaureate. 2nd ed. Moscow: Yurait., 2017. 309 p. (In Russ.)

37. Rozet I.M. Psychology of Fantasy. Experimental and Theoretical Research of the Internal Patterns of Productive Mental Activity. 2nd ed. Minsk: Universitetskoe, 1991. 196 p. (In Russ.)

38. Sartr Zh.-P. Imaginary. Phenomenological Psychology of Imagination / Transl. from French by M. Beketova. Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 2001. 319 p. (In Russ.)

39. Vygotskii L.S. Imagination and Creativity in Childhood. Psychological Essays. Teacher’s Book. 3rd ed. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1991. 90 p. (In Russ.)

40. Soldatova G.U., Rasskazova E.I., Nestik T.A. Digital Generation of Russia. Competence and Safety. Moscow: Smysl, 2017. 375 p. (In Russ.)

41. Danby S.J., Fleer M., Davidson C., Hatzigianni M. (eds.). Digital Childhoods: Technologies and Children’s Everyday Lives. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development. Vol. 22. Springer, 2018. 287 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6484-5

42. Nutskova E.V. Diagnostic and Forensic Assessment of the Psychological Consequences of Sexual Violence and Abuse against Girls. Psychology and Law. 2018. Vol. 8. No. 4. P. 75– 98. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2018080408


Review

For citations:


Sekerazh T.N. Current Capacities of Forensic Psychological and Comprehensive Analysis When Examining Footage of Procedural and Non-Procedural Actions. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021;16(1):100-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-1-100-113

Views: 1215


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1819-2785 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7275 (Online)