Forensic Construction Investigation of Reconstructed Premises
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-4-64-71
Abstract
The article addresses solving the issue of the possibility of preserving reconstructed premises or carrying out proposed reconstruction works in the course of in the course of construction forensic investigation. The significance of the problem attributes to the volume of the stock of residential and public buildings which are older than 40 years (according to statistics, the housing stock of Russia in 1980 was 1,861 million m2 , in 2015 – 3,581 million m2 ), outdated layouts of premises, and the evolved consumers’ idea of comfort.
A construction expert’s task is to determine if there is a possibility to change the layout, the function of premises to improve living conditions, or reconstruction poses a threat to the state of the object, its further proper operation, the integrity of the installed engineering systems, the appearance of the facades, nearby buildings and structures.
Using regulatory material, the authors consider the criteria for solving this problem, present the procedure for conducting studies of buildings or structures, building materials, structures, and relevant documents in this line of forensic construction examination. Finally, the article gives specific examples of the redevelopment of apartments, a proposed reconstruction of the kindergarten premises.
It is noted that the reliability of experts’ opinions is based on a comprehensive, unbiased analysis of all the technical and economic characteristics of construction objects, verification of documentation, an inspection of structures for compliance with the requirements of federal laws, rules, and regulations.
About the Authors
I. D. Platonova
Platov South-Russian State Polytechnic University (NPI)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Platonova Irina Dmitrievna – Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Urban Planning, Design of Buildings and Structures
Novocherkassk 346428
N. G. TSaritova
Platov South-Russian State Polytechnic University (NPI)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tsaritova Nadezhda Gennad’evna – Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Urban Planning, Design of Buildings and Structures
Novocherkassk 346428
E. G. Tekutov
Limited Liability Company Center for Independent Evaluation and Expertise «YUG-EXPERTISE»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tekutov Evgenii Gennad’evich – Construction Expert in the field of forensic construction and cost examination of real estate, specialist
Novocherkassk 346400
References
1. Butyrin A.Yu., Stativa E.B., Lyubimenko D.P., Fomenko A.E., Krylova M.I. Topical Issues Regarding the Causality of Construction Incidents. Forensic Engineering. 2018. Vol. 171. No. 4. P. 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1680/jfoen.18.00010
2. Grigorieva A.Yu. Consideration in the Judicial Construction and Technical Expertise of the Causes of Damage to the Dwelling During the Reconstruction (Re-planning). International Journal of Advanced Studies. 2017. Vol. 7. No. 2-2. P. 51–53. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12731/2227-930X-2017-2-2-51-53
3. Grabow K.P., Levanov S.V. Characteristic Approaches to the Implementation of Construction and Technical Research in Relation to Construction, Reconstruction, Modernization, Technical Re-equipment and Overhaul in Modern Conditions. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2019. No. 2. P. 84–91. (In Russ.).
4. Petrov K.S., Kaz’min S.A., Shamaeva K.G., Moskalenko M.A. Possible Ways of Improvement of Forensic Examination Researches of Reconstructed Construction Objects. Engineering Journal of Don. 2019. No. 4. (In Russ.). http://ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n4y2019/5853
5. Bredikhin V.V., Los’ K.I. Formation and Specifity of Cost Expertise in Russia as a Type of Judicial Construction and Technical Expertise. BST: Bulletin of Construction Machinery. 2020. No. 7 (1031). P. 26–28. (In Russ.).
6. Butyrin A.Yu., Sokolov Yu.B., Stativa E.B., Grabbe T.A., Khisheva O.I. Determination of the Technical Feasibility and Development of Options for the Redesign of Administrative and Warehouse Buildings in Compliance with the Conditions Specified by the Court. Methodical Recommendations for the Conduct of Cost and Transformation Studies in Forensic Construction Investigation. Moscow: RFCFS, 2016. P. 265–309. (In Russ.).
7. Butyrin A.Yu, Chudievich A.R., Lukovkina O.V. Determination of Types, Volumes, Quality and Cost of Construction and Installation and Special Works for the Erection, Repair (Reconstruction) of Buildings. Collection of Methodical Recommendations for the Conduct of Forensic Construction Investigation. Moscow: RFCFS, 2012. P. 7–54. (In Russ.).
8. Butyrin A.Yu. Determination of the Technical Feasibility and Development of Options for the Redesign of a Residential House as an Element of Homeownership in Compliance with the Conditions Specified by the Court. Collection of Methodical Recommendations for the Conduct of Forensic Construction Investigation. Moscow: RFCFS, 2012. P. 55–96. (In Russ.).
9. Butyrin A.Yu., Danilkin I.A. Improving the Practice of Forensic Investigation of Buildings and Structures Undergoing Reconstruction. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 27–33. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-2-27-33
10. Abdrakhmanov R.A. Forensic Construction and Technical Expertise at the Present Stage. Prospects for the Development of Science and Education. Collection of Scientific Papers Based on the Materials of the XXIV International Scientific and Practical Conference (Moscow, December 28, 2017). Moscow: IP Tugolukov, 2017. P. 202–204. (In Russ.).
11. Orlov Yu.K. Current Issues of Proof and Application of Specialized Knowledge in Criminal Proceedings. Moscow: Prospekt, 2017. 216 p. (In Russ.).
12. Rossinskaya E.R. Forensic Science in Criminal, Civil, Arbitration Proceedings. Moscow: Pravo i Zakon, 1996. 224 p. (In Russ.).
13. Pedenchuk A.K. Problems of Ensuring the Reliability of a Forensic Expert Conclusion. Moscow: VNIISE, 1992. 148 p. (In Russ.).
14. Zhizhina M.V. On the Activities of the Court in Evaluating Expert Opinions. Proceedings of the 4th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Theory and Practice of Forensic Examination in Current Conditions” (Moscow, 30–31 January, 2013). Moscow: Prospect. P. 112–115. (In Russ.).
15. Butyrin A.Yu. Theory and Practice of Construction Forensics. Moscow: Gorodets, 2006. 544 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Platonova I.D., TSaritova N.G., Tekutov E.G. Forensic Construction Investigation of Reconstructed Premises. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021;16(4):64-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-4-64-71
Views:
1225
Email this article 