On the Possibility of Using the Chemometric (Discriminant) Method of Analysis in the Comparative Study of Heroin
https://doi.org/10.30764/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-2-61-68
Abstract
The paper aimed to ascertain the possibility of using the chemometric (discriminant) method when analyzing the results of mid-range IR spectroscopy and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for a comparative study of heroin to establish a common source of origin. The advantage of this method of comparative research in comparison to the existing ones is the reduction in the time for obtaining the result, the clarity and automation of the comparison process, which is essential for the comparative study of a large number of objects and the keeping of the corresponding type of forensic accounting. The paper shows that the results obtained by chemometric processing of data from two non-correlating analysis methods (IR spectroscopy and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) coincided.
About the Authors
L. I. ModinovaRussian Federation
Modinova Larisa Ivanovna – Candidate of Chemistry, Deputy Head of Department of Forensic Examinations of Materials, Substances, Products
Nizhny Novgorod 603134
N. A. Shcherbakov
Russian Federation
Shcherbakov Nikolai Alekseevich – Section Chief of Department of Forensic Examinations of Materials, Substances, Products
Nizhny Novgorod 603134
References
1. Sorokin V.I., Orlova O.S., Lyubetsky G.V. Establishing a Common Source of Origin for Heroin. Methodical Recommendation. Moscow: EKTs Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2002. 80 p. (In Russ.).
2. Zav’yalova A.A., Zav’yalov V.V., Gladyrev V.V., Lyubetskii G.V., Bagrov A.D. Methodical Foundations for Establishing the Common Source of Origin of Synthetic Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. Methodical Recommendations. Moscow: EKTs Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2013.104 p. (In Russ.).
3. Shcherbakov S.Yu., Sarychev I.I., Syromyatnikov S.V. Comparative Study of Drugs Included in the Amphetamine Group to Establish the Source of Origin. Methodical Recommendations. Moscow: EKU 9 Department of the Federal Drug Control Service of Russia, 2006. 21 p. (In Russ.).
4. Elizarova T.E., Pletneva T.V. Chemometric Analysis at Near/Infrared Spectrophotometry Identification of Pharmaceutical Substances and Preparations. RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2008. No. 7. P. 165–167. (In Russ.).
5. Balyiklova K.S., Sadchikova N.P., Arzamastzev A.P., Titova A.V. Using Near IR-Spectroscopy for Analysis of Sulfalen and Its Dosage Forms. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Chemistry. Biology. Pharmacy. 2009. No. 1. P. 97–100. (In Russ.).
6. Burashnikova M.M., Kurchatkin S.P., Monakhova Yu.B., Mushtakova S.P., Tsikin A.M. Principal Component Analysis in Paint Coatings Expertise. Forensic Examination. 2014. No. 2 (38). P. 95–106. (In Russ.).
7. Lobachev A.L., Fomina N.V., Monakhova Yu.B. Identification of the Samara Region’s Oil Products Using the Method of Principal Components and Factor Discriminant Analysis. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Chemistry. Biology. Ecology. 2015. Vol. 15. Issue 1. P. 23–27. (In Russ.).
8. Bolotnik T.A., Timchenko Yu.V., Plushchenko I.V., Levkina V.V., Pirogov A.V., Smolenkov A.D., Popik M.V., Shpigun O.A. The Use of Chemometric Methods of Data Analysis for the Identification and Typification of Petroleum and Petroleum Products. Mass Spectrometry. 2018. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 203–208. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.25703/MS.2018.15.36
9. Silve C.S., Pimemtel M.F., Amigo J.M., Garcia-Ruiz C., Ortega-Ojeda F. Chemometric Approaches for Document Dating: Handling Paper Variability. Analytica Chemica Acta. 2018. Vol. 1031. P. 28–37. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.06.031
10. Monakhova Yu.B., Mushtakova S.P. Mathematical Processing of Spectra in the Analysis of Mixtures by the Method of Independent Components: Identification and Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2012. Vol. 67. No. 12. P. 1044–1051. (In Russ.).
11. Monakhova Yu.B., Tsikin A.M., Mushtakova S.P. Processing of NMR, UV, and IR Spectrometric Data Prior to Chemometric Simulation by Independent Component and Principal Component Analysis. Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2016. Vol. 71. No. 6. P. 582–588. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.7868/S0044450216060128.
12. Maione C., de Oliveira Souza V.C., Togni L.R., da Costa J.L., Campiglia A.D., Barbosa F., Barbosa R.M. Using Cluster Analysis and ICP-MS to Identify Groups of Ecstasy Tablets in Sao Paolo State, Brazil. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2017. Vol. 62. P. 1479–1486. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13448
13. Eliaerts J., Dardenne P., Meert N., van Durme F., Samyn N., Janssens K., De Wael K. Rapid Classification of Cocaine in Seized Powders with ATR-FTIR and Chemometrics. Drug Testing and Analysis. 2017. Vol. 9. No. 10. P. 1480–1489. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.2149
14. Mariotti K.C., Marcelo M.C.A., Ortiz R.S., Borille B.T., Reis M., Fett M.S., Ferrao M.F., Limberger R.P. Seized Cannabis Seeds Cultivated in Greenhouse: A Chemical Study by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and Chemometric Analysis. Science & Justice. 2016. Vol. 56. No. 1. P. 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2015.09.002
15. Kumar R., Sharma V. Chemometrics in Forensic Science // Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2018. Vol. 105. P. 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.05.010
16. Bovens M., Ahrens B., Alberink I., Nordgaard A., Salonen T., Huhtala S. Chemometrics in Forensic Chemistry – Part I: Implications to the Forensic Workflow. Forensic Science International. 2019. Vol. 301. P. 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.030
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Modinova L.I., Shcherbakov N.A. On the Possibility of Using the Chemometric (Discriminant) Method of Analysis in the Comparative Study of Heroin. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021;16(2):61-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-2-61-68