Formation of Intellectual Property Forensics in the System of the Russian Ministry of Justice
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-3-98-105
Abstract
The article analyses legal regulations of a forensic investigation into intellectual property o jects regarding the appointment of examinations of trademarks and service marks. The matter of necessity of specialized knowledge to conduct such investigations is addressed as well as current expert and judicial practice in this field. The author notes that forensic analysis of trade and service marks should be carried out as a part of a comprehensive examination in complex cases. The investigation should also include a sociological study.
It is shown that the training of state forensic experts in the Russian Ministry of Justice system for intellectual property forensics, among other things to assess its value, will provide fully competent, unbiased, and independent experts and specialists in the field. The author proposes acknowledging and adding to the List of types of forensic examinations conducted in the Federal budget forensic institutions of the Russian Ministry of Justice the new type of forensic examinations – “Intellectual Property Forensics”.
About the Author
A. S. SavenkoRussian Federation
Savenko Anton Sergeevich – Patent Engineer, Research Assistant at the Department of Innovations in the Practice of Forensic Science of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice; Graduate Research Student of the Department of Forensic Examination Activities, RUDN University; Lecturer’s Assistant at Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Moscow 109028
Moscow 117198
Moscow 105055
References
1. Rossinskaya E.R. Forensic Expertise in the Civil, Arbitration, Administrative and Criminal Proceedings. 4 th ed. Moscow: Norma: Infra-M, 2018. 576 p. (In Russ.)
2. Belkin R.S. Forensic Encyclopedia. 2 nd ed. Moscow: Megatron XXI, 2000. 334 p. (In Russ.)
3. Dodin E.V. Proof and Evidence in Law Enforcement Activities of Soviet Organs of Public Administration. Kiev; Odessa: Vishcha shk., 1976. 127 p. (In Russ.)
4. Aver’yanova T.V., Rossinskaya E.R. Encyclopedia of Forensic Examination. Moscow: Yurist”, 1999. 551 p. (In Russ.)
5. Orlov Yu.K. Expert’s Opinion and Its Assessment (on Criminal Cases). Textbook. Moscow: Yurist, 1995. 64 p. (In Russ.)
6. Treushnikov M.K. Forensic Evidence. Monograph. 3 rd ed. Moscow: Gorodets, 2004. 268 p. (In Russ.)
7. Sakhnova T.V. Forensic Expertise. Moscow: Gorodets, 1999. 365 p. (In Russ.)
8. Novoselova L.A., Rozhkova M.A. (eds). The Practice of Commercial Disputes Resolution. Analysis and Commentary on Decisions of the Plenum and Reviews of the Presidium of The Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. Issue 17. Moscow: Statut, 2011. 293 p. (In Russ.)
9. Boichenko S.B., Boyarov V.І., Budko T.V., Varfolomeeva T.V., Goncharenko V.G. Expertise in the Legal Proceedings of Ukraine / Goncharenko V.G., Gora І.V. (eds). Kiev: Yurіnkom Іnter, 2017. 502 p. (In Ukrainian)
10. Reilly R.F. CPA Intellectual Property Forensic Analysis Valuation Considerations. Insights. Summer 2011. http://www.willamette.com/insights/summer2011.html
11. Jeffers J. Computer Forensics: Intellectual Property Investigations and the CCFE, 2018. https://resources.infosecinstitute.com/category/computerforensics/introduction/areas-ofstudy/computer-forensics-investigations/intellectual-property-investigations-and-the-ccfe/
12. Omel’yanyuk G.G., Gulevskaya V.V., Savenko A.S. Systematization of Intellectual Property Objects for Forensic Purposes. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 1 P. 6–12. https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-16-12
Review
For citations:
Savenko A.S. Formation of Intellectual Property Forensics in the System of the Russian Ministry of Justice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020;15(3):98-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-3-98-105