The Extremist Internet Discourse: Legal, Scientific and Practical Aspects of Forensic Linguistic Analysis
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-2-81-90
Abstract
The paper presents a discussion of legal, scientific, and practical aspects of forensic linguistic analysis of the Internet extremist discourse as practiced at present and might be improved in the future. The author states that present experts’ practice in Russian legislation is based on limited knowledge of Internet linguistics properties and is conducted mostly as an empirical art in which the forensic linguist examiner acquires skill through extensive linguistic training and forensic experience. Courtroom cases in which forensic linguists have offered their written reports and testimony on extremist materials distributed on the Internet have got negative critical assessment in mass-media and scientific linguistic society. The judicial responses have varied with rulings, both admitting and rejecting extremist linguistic evidence. To some extent, the various legal viewpoints have reflected various linguistic methodical perspectives regarding the extremist diagnostic criteria to be expected in the examined Internet discourse represented under various forensic and communicative conditions. The necessity to use the unified linguistic criteria of resolving Internet text ambiguity is substantiated in the paper. The author concludes that methodological uncertainties concerning the contemporary expert practice of detecting linguistic signs of extremist statements are so significant as requiting that the forensic applications be approached with great caution.
About the Author
E. I. GalyashinaRussian Federation
Galyashina Elena Igorevna – Doctor of Law, Doctor of Philology, Professor of Forensic Expertise’s Department
Moscow 125993
References
1. Lombardi M., Ragab E., Chin V., Dandurand Y., de Divitiis V., Burato A. (eds). Countering Radicalisation and Violent Extremism among Youth to Prevent Terrorism. IOS Press, 2015. 233 p.
2. McQuade III S.C. Understanding and Managing Cybercrime. Boston: Pearson Education, 2006. 500 p.
3. Katzenbeisser S., Petitcolas F.A.P. (eds.). Information Hiding Techniques for Steganography and Digital Watermarking. Boston: Artech House, 2000. 213 p.
4. Galyashina E.I. Linguistic Analysis in the Speaker Identification Systems: Integrated Comprehensive Approach Based on Forensic Science Technology. Computer Linguistic and Intellectual Technologies. On the Materials of the Annual International Conference “Dialogue” (Moscow, May 27–30, 2015). Issue14 (21). Vol. 1. Moscow: RGGU, 2015. P. 156–168. (In Russ.)
5. Jones R. Internet Forensics. Sebastopol, USA: O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2005. 242 p.
6. Baron N.S. Always on: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 304 p.
7. Baron N.S. See You Online: Gender Issues in College Student Use of Instant Messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 2004. 23 (4). P. 397–423. http://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04269585
8. Thurlow C. The Internet and language. In R. Mesthrie (ed). Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001. P. 287–289.
9. Davis B.H., Brewer J.P. Electronic Discourse: Linguistic Individuals in Virtual Space. State University of New York Press. 1997. 217 p.
10. Ferrara K., Brunner H., Whittemore G. Interactive Written Discourse as an Emergent Register. Written Communication. 1991. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 8–34. http://doi.org/10.1177/0741088391008001002
11. Bentahila A., Davies E. David Crystal, Language and the Internet. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Pp. xi, 304. Hb $29.99. Language in Society. 2008. Vol. 37. No. 5. P. 761–775. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404508081086
12. Macfadyen L.P., Roche J., Doff S. Communicating across Cultures in Cyberspace. Vol. 2. A Bibliographical Review of Intercultural Communication Online. Münster: LIT Verlag, 2004. 205 p.
13. Herring S.C. (Ed). Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996. 313 p. http://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39
14. Akhapkin Ya.E., Rakhlin E.V. (Eds). The Modern Russian Language Online. Moscow: Languages of Slavic culture, 2014. 328 p. (In Russ.)
15. Kukushkina O.V., Safonova Yu.A., Sekerazh T.N. Methodology for Conducting Forensic Psychological and Linguistic Examination of Materials on Cases Related to Countering Extremism and Terrorism. Moscow: RFCFS, 2014. 98 p. (In Russ.)
16. Galyashina E.I. Linguistics vs Extremism: To Assist Judges, Investigators, Experts / M.V. Gorbanevskii (ed). Moscow: Yuridicheskii Mir, 2006. 96 p. (In Russ.)
17. Kukushkina O.V., Safonova Yu.A., Sekerazh T.N. Theoretical and Methodological Framework for the Production of Forensic Psychological and Linguistic Analysis of Texts on Cases Involving Countering Extremism. Moscow: EKOM, 2011. 326 p. (In Russ.)
18. Sekerazh T.N., Kuznetsov V.O. Integrated Forensic Psycholinguistic Analysis: Forms, Types, Prospects of Development. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016. No. 4 (44). P. 98–107. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2016-4-98-107
19. Smirnova S.A., Sekerazh T.N., Kuznetsov V.O. Interdisciplinary Evaluations Performed by Forensic Science Organizations of the Russian Ministry of Justice: Current Trends in Forensic Linguistics and Forensic Psychology. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 4. P. 6–11. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-4-106-109
20. Edzhubov L.G., Usov A.I., Miklyaeva O.V., Karpukhina E.S. Introducing a New Concept in the Theory of Integrated Forensic Investigation. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No. 2 (34). P. 10–17. (In Russ.)
21. Durant A., Leuhg J.H.C. Language and law. A Resource Book for Students. Routledge, 2016. 241 p.
Review
For citations:
Galyashina E.I. The Extremist Internet Discourse: Legal, Scientific and Practical Aspects of Forensic Linguistic Analysis. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020;15(2):81-90. https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-2-81-90