The Continuity of Traditions of Scientific School of the RFCFS in S.A. Smirnova’s Organizational, Scientific and Pedagogical Achievements
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-2-28-36
Abstract
More than a 100-year history of the development of the forensic institutions in Russia demonstrates the objective link between the stages of the system’s evolution and the political, economic, and social transformations in the society. The continuity of scientific schools in the system of forensic expert institutions of the Ministry of Justice is shown on the example of S.A. Smirnova’s activity. Leading the modern system of forensic institutions, she is a talented organizer of innovative scientific research, a major administrator who cares for her team, creates and increases the material and technical base of forensic laboratories, the scientist who has influenced the recognition in the scientific school of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science in the scientific community, as well as a teacher who has brought up more than one generation of expert researchers. The set of achievements of the forensic science institutions team of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation marks the current stage in the development of forensic expertise based on continuity and deep respect for the traditions of the scientific school with a comprehensive modernization of the practical activities of the system.
About the Author
E. V. Chesnokova
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Chesnokova Elena Vladimirovna – Candidate of Law, Deputy Head of the Forensic Research Methodology Department in the System of Forensic Institutions of the Russian Ministry of Justice; Head of the Dissertation Research Sector of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice; Academic Secretary of the Joint Dissertation Board of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of Russian Ministry of Justice and RUDN University
Moscow 109028; Moscow 117198
References
1. Smirnova S.A., Zamaraeva N.A. About the History of the System of Forensic Institutions of the Ministry of Justice of Russia. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2012. No. 4 (28). P. 134–140. (In Russ.)
2. Smirnova S.A. 100 Years since the Establishment of Forensic Science Organizations of the Russian Ministry of Justice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2012. No. 3 (27). P. 10–13. (In Russ.)
3. Orlova V.F. Alexander Romanovich Shlyakhov, Who Had No Equal in Forensic Expertise. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2012. No. 4 (28). P. 124–133. (In Russ.)
4. The Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language by Vladimir Dahl. 2 nd ed. Vol. 1. А–Z. St. Petersburg: M.O. Wolf’s Printing House, 1880. 723 p. (In Russ.)
5. Chesnokova E.V. Department of Forensic Activity is an Example of the Synthesis of Science and Forensic Practices and Education. RUDN Journal of Law. 2020. Vol. 1. No. 24. P. 193–202. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2020-24-1-193-202
6. Boldyrev I.V. ISO/IEC 17025:2017. Practical Recommendations on Application. St. Petersburg: Professiya, 2018. 128 p. (In Russ.)
7. Morozov L.P. And on Stones Flowers Grow. Words of Gratitude to the Knowledgeable Persons of the Republic’s Treasure. Cheboksary: IPK “Chuvashiya”, 2018. 183 p. (In Russ.)
8. Leont’ev D.A., Rasskazova E.I. Viability Test. Moscow: Smysl, 2006. 63 p. (In Russ.)
9. Zubra A.S. Manager-Ideologist. Management Issues (Minsk). 2005. No. 2. (15). P. 102–110. (In Russ.)
10. Smirnova S.A., Usov A.I. Forensic Expertise as a Basic Mechanism for Enforcing the Rule of Law in SCO Member States. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 6–15. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-2-6-15
11. Omeliyanyuk G.G. Annual Meeting of Working Group on the Quality and Competence of ENFSI in Brussels, Belgium on November 21–22, 2011. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2012. No. 1 (25). P. 174–175. (In Russ.).
12. Smirnova S.A., Omeliyanyuk G.G., Usov A.I., Bebeshko G.I. Special Considerations in Applying the Key Terms and Definitions of the International Standard GOST ISO/IEC 17025-2009 in Forensic Science Laboratory. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2012. No. 2 (26). P. 56–67. (In Russ.)
13. Smirnova S.A. Current Trends in the Development of Forensic Science (Report to the National Conference of the Heads of Forensic Science Organizations of the Russian Ministry of Justice). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2012. No. 2 (26). P. 8–12. (In Russ.)
14. Smirnova S.A. (ed). Multimodal Issue “Forensic Science: Reboot”. Part 1. The Challenges of Time and Technology Expert Law Enforcement. Moscow: EKOM, 2012. 655 p. (In Russ.)
15. Smirnova S.A. RFCFS over the Decades: 1962–2012. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2013. No. 1 (29). P. 8–12. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Chesnokova E.V. The Continuity of Traditions of Scientific School of the RFCFS in S.A. Smirnova’s Organizational, Scientific and Pedagogical Achievements. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020;15(2):28-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-2-28-36
Views:
748
Email this article 