On the Legislative Developments in Forensic Activity
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-1-42-49
Abstract
The article gives a detailed analysis of the changes made by the Federal Law of 26.07.2019 No. 224-FZ to the Federal Law “On the state forensic activity in the Russian Federation” and the Federal Law “On the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation”. These developments, primarily related to the establishment of a forensic institution of the Investigative Committee, have been criticized by the legal community since they legalize the supremacy of a criminal prosecution body over the expert offices. At that, some authors justify the need for the forensic expert departments in the structure of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, especially since both in Russia and abroad forensic offices in the bodies dealing with investigating crimes do exist. The Federal Law of 26.07.2019 No. 224-FZ came into force, and till 01.01.2022, the forensic institution of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation is to be established, and the list of departmental forensic agencies will be extended.
About the Author
N. V. MikhalevaRussian Federation
Mikhaleva Natal’ya Valer’evna – Candidate of Law, Head of the Infornation and Publishing Department of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice; Associate Professor at the Department of Forensic Examination Activities, Law Institute of RUDN University
Moscow 109028,
Moscow 117198
References
1. Rossinskaya E.R. Modern Forensics and Its Improvements. Law. 2019. No. 10. P. 31–42. (In Russ.)
2. Smirnova S.A., Koldin V.Ya. Forensic Technologies: Contemporary State and Perspectives. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 137–144. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764//1819-2785-2019-14-4-137-144
3. Bordyugov L.G. The Issues of Forensic Expert Activity in the Works of Prof. E.R. Rossinskaya. In: Galashina E.I., Lebedeva A.K., Chernyavskaya M.S. (eds). Development of Forensic Science and Forensic Expertise in the Works of Professor E.R. Rossinskaya. To the Anniversary of the Scientist, Expert, Teacher. Materials of the International Scientific-Practical Conference. (Moscow, November 27, 2019). Moscow: Prospekt, 2019. P. 68–75. (In Russ.)
4. Plesovskikh Yu.G. Forensic Expert Research: Legal, Theoretical, Methodological and Informational Framework of Conduct. Monography. Moscow: Yurist, 2008. 240 p. (In Russ.)
5. White P. (ed). Crime Scene to Court. The Essentials of Forensic Science. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2004. 451 p.
6. Makarenko I.A., Exarkhopulo A.A. On Legalization of the Guiding Role of the Investigation in Organizing and Carrying out Forensic Examinations. Juridical Journal of Samara University. 2019. Vol. 5. No. 4. P. 152–157. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18287/2542047X-2019-5-4-152-157
7. Bagmet A.M. Prof. E.R. Rossinskaya’s Scientific Contribution to the Development of Forensic Expert Activity of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation. In: Galashina E.I., Lebedeva A.K., Chernyavskaya M.S. (eds). Development of Forensic Science and Forensic Expertise in the Works of Professor E.R. Rossinskaya. To the anniversary of the scientist, expert, teacher. Materials of the International Scientific-Practical Conference. (Moscow, November 27, 2019). Moscow: Prospekt, 2019. P. 45–51. (In Russ.)
8. Bespalov Yu.F., Egorova O.A. Commentary on the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (article-by-article, scientific and practical). 2 nd ed. Moscow: Prospekt, 2017. 736 p. (In Russ.)
9. Borisov A.N., Lagvilava R.P. Commentary on the Russian Federation Administrative Procedure Code amended on March 8, 2015 No. 21-FZ (article-by-article). 2nd ed. Moscow: Yustitsinform, 2018. 544 p. (In Russ.)
10. Bezlepkin B.T. Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (ar-ticle-by-article). Considering Amendments and Additions of the Federal Law No. 329-FZ, 331FZ, 375-FZ. 14th ed. Moscow: Prospekt, 2017. 609 p. (In Russ.)
11. Orlova V.F. Forensic Science. In: Smironova S.A. (ed). Multi-Modal Publication “Forensic examination: Reboot”. Part 2. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Forensic Science Theory. Moscow: Ekom, 2012. P. 350–351. (In Russ.)
12. Averina K.N., Podkatilina M.L., Shamaev G.P. Commentary on the Federal Law of 31.05.2001 No. 73-FZ “On the state forensic activity in the Russian Federation” (prepared for the system “Garant”). 2018. (In Russ.). https://base.garant.ru/77574160/
13. Smirnova S.A. All Experts Should Follow Same Rules. Law. 2019. No. 10. P. 8–18. (In Russ.)
14. Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I., Zinin A.M. The Theory of Forensic Expertise (Forensic Expertology). Textbook / E.R. Rossinskaya (ed). 2nd ed. Moscow: Norma: Infra-M, 2016. 368 p. (In Russ.)
15. Branovitsky K.L., Rents I.G., Reshetnikova I.V. Can You Trust an Expert? A Few Words on the Quality Assurance of Forensic Science (A Comparative Legal Analysis). Law. 2019. No. 10. P. 43–54. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Mikhaleva N.V. On the Legislative Developments in Forensic Activity. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020;15(1):42-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-1-42-49