Why Psychological and Pedagogical Examinations in Disputes Concerning Child-Rearing Do Not Meet the Needs of Justice

Basing on the compilation of expert practice and the analysis of court practice reasons for the extensive increase psychological and pedagogical examinations assigned in civil proceedings in cases concerning child-rearing are addressed. The main associated issues are the lack of the own methodology for psychological and pedagogical examinations in the judicial proceedings; resolving questions by educational and education psychologists, which are out of the scope of their specialized knowledge and competence, including those falling within the purview of the court’s exclusive com­petence; giving unreasonable advice, which violates citizens’ rights; the lack of professional compe­tence necessary to conduct forensic expertise. It is found that opinions on the results of psychological and pedagogical examinations do not meet the requirements of the law, including on account of private educational psychologists’ insufficient professional training. It is shown that the inadequacy of law regarding professional and qualification requirements to experts allows courts to treat the verification of experts’ competence uncritically. As a result, an improper subject of forensic activity is introduced to the civil proceedings, which violates citizens’ rights to justice, undermines people’s trust in the institutions of forensic expertise and judicial authority.  Given the relevance of the issue, the grounds for application of specialized psychological knowledge in the form of forensic expertise in the civil disputes involving child-rearing are presented in the article, the scope of the necessary experts’ competences is outlined as well as the requirements to their specialized professional training, since forensic examinations must be conducted on a strictly scientific basis, objec­tively and comprehensively.  

1. Ilina O.Yu., Rusakovskaya O.A. About Use of Special Knowledge at Consideration of Judicial Disputes about Education of Children by the Parents Living Separately. Herald of TvSU. Series: Law. 2019. No. 4 (60). P. 127–136. (In Russ.)

2. Egorova O.A., Bespalov Yu.F. A Judge’s Hand-book on Family Disputes. Moscow: Prospekt, 2013. 240 р. (In Russ.)

3. Fesenkova L.V., Shatalov A.T. World-view and Scientific Standing of Valeology (to the Problem of General Theory of Health). In: Shatalov A.T. (ed). Philosophy of Health. Moscow: Philosophy Institute of the Russian Academy of Science, 2001. P. 110–128. (In Russ.)

4. Dmitrieva T.B., Safuanov F.S. (eds). Medical and Forensic Psychology: Course of Lectures: Textbook. 4th ed. Moscow: Genezis, 2016. 656 p. (In Russ.)

5. Safuanov F.S., Kharitonova N.K., Rusakovskaya O.A. Psychological and Psychiatric Expertise in Legal Disputes Between Parents About Child’s Place of Residence. Moscow: Genezis, 2012. 192 p. (In Russ.)

6. Kharitonova N.K., Safuanov F.S., Vostroknutov N.V., Rusakovskaya O.A. Methodological Framework of Conduct for Integrated Psychological and Psychiatric Examinations in Disputes about the Right to Raise Children. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No. 3 (35). P. 93–106. (In Russ.)

7. Professional Practice Guidelines for Occupationally Mandated Psychological Evaluations Approved by American Psychological Association (APA) Council of Representatives on Feb. 24, 2017. https://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/psychological-evaluations

8. Practice Directorate, American Psychological Assn, Washington, DC. Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations in Divorce Proceedings. American Psychologist. 1994. Vol. 49. No. 7. P. 677–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.49.7.677

9. Melton G., Petrila J., Poythress N., Slobogin C. Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers. 4th ed. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 2017. 964 p.

10. Kudryavtsev I.A., Morozova M.V., Savina O.F. Guide on Writing an Opinion on Experimental Psychological Research When Conducting Psychological and Psychiatric Examinations of the Same Kind and Integrated Examinations: Guide for Doctors. Moscow: FGBU GNTsSSP im. V.P. Serbskogo Minzdrava Rossii, 2014. 67 p. (In Russ.)

11. Umnyashova I.B., Safuanov F.S. A Model of Psychological and Pedagogical Evaluation in the System of Education. Psychological Science and Education. 2017. Vol. 22. No. 4. P. 75– 84. (In Russ.)

12. Ivanchenko G.V., Leont’ev D.A., Safuanov F.S., Tul’chinskii T.L. On the Systematic Methodology of Integrated Humanitarian Expertise. The Works of Yaroslavl’ Methodological Seminar. Vol. 3. Methods of Psychology. Yaroslavl’: MAPN, 2005. P. 89–110. (In Russ.)

13. Safuanov F.S. Humanitarian Expertology: Pressing Issues and Perspectives. In: G.V. Ivanchenko, D.A. Leont’ev (eds). Expertise in the Modern World: from Knowledge to Activity. Moscow: Smysl, 2006. P. 51–62. (In Russ.)

14. Koldin V.Ya., Seitenov K.K., Krestovnikov O.A. Global Models of Criminalistics and Forensic Science. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 6–11. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-3-6-11

15. Sekerazh T.N. Expert Mistakes in Conduct of Forensic Psychological Expertise. In: Rossinskaya (ed.). Forensic Expertise: Typical Mistakes. Moscow: Prospekt, 2014. P. 183– 225. (In Russ.)

16. Safuanov F.S. Ethical Issues of Using Psychological Knowledge in the Proceedings of the Non-Procedural Forms. Psychology and Law. 2014. Vol. 4. No. 4. P. 79–87. (In Russ.). https://psyjournals.ru/psyandlaw/2014/n4/73024.shtml

17. Bernet W. The Terapist’s Role in Child Custody Disputes. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry. 1983. Vol. 22. Issue 2. P. 180–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-7138(09)62333-5

18. Haller L.H. Before the Judge: The Child-Custody Evaluation. Adolescent Psychiatry. 1981. No. 9. P. 142–164.

19. Greenberg S.A., Shuman D.W. Irreconcilable Conflict between Therapeutic and Forensic Roles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 1997. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.28.1.50

20. Safuanov F.S., Savina O.F., Morozova M.V., Kalashnikova A.S., Kulakov S.S., Perepravina Yu.O., Chernen’kov A.D., Soldatova K.M. Organization, Scope and Content of Psychological Examination in Different Kinds of Forensic Psychiatric Expertise: Methodological Recommendations. Moscow: FGBU “NMITs PN im. V.P. Serbskogo” Minzdrava Rossii, 2019. 36 p. (In Russ.)