International Forensic Cooperation and Advocacy
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-4-43-54
Abstract
About the Authors
A. Ya. AsnisRussian Federation
Asnis Aleksandr Yakovlevich – Doctor of Law, Principal Researcher
Director
Sh. N. Khaziev
Russian Federation
Khaziev Shamil Nikolaevich – Doctor of Law, Attorney-at-Law
References
1. Defence Investigations in International Criminal Trials. Practitioner’s Handbook. Edited by the Defense Office of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. 2017. 218 p.
2. Khaziev Sh.N. Principles of International Law and Forensic Science. Materials of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference “Theory and Practice of Forensic Science in Current Conditions” (Moscow, January 22–23, 2015). Moscow: Prospekt, 2015. P. 482–484. (In Russ.)
3. Khaziev Sh.N. On International and National Academies of Forensic Science. Contemporary Humanitarian Studies. 2010. No. 2. P. 183–189. (In Russ.)
4. Khaziev Sh.N. The Issues of Forensic Expertise in the Activities of the European Association of Advocates. Humanities scientific researches. 2010. No. 3. P. 184–186. (In Russ.)
5. Grieve D.L. Built by Many Hands. Journal of Forensic Identification. 1999. No. 49 (5). P. 565–579.
6. Khaziev Sh.N. Assistance of the International Forensic Community in Exposing Erroneous Identification in the Shirley McKie Case. The Advocate. 2008. No. 9. P. 3–8. (In Russ.)
7. MacKie I., Russell M. Shirley McKie: The Price of Innocence. Edinburg: Birlinn, 2007. 208 p.
8. Policing. Forensic Services and Infrastructure: Criminal Justice Assessment Toolkit. New York: United Nations, 2010. P. 11.
9. Kukucka J., Kassin S.M., Zapf P.A., Dror I.E. Cognitive Bias and Blindness: A Global Survey of Forensic Science Examiners. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2017. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 452–459. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001
10. Asnis A.Ya. Subjectiviti and Objectiviti in Forensic Science and Modern Law Practice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016. No. 1 (41). P. 60–62. (In Russ.)
11. Eeden C.A.J., de Poot C.J., van Koppen P.J. The Forensic Confirmation Bias: A Comparison between Experts and Novices. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2018. Vol. 64. No. 1. P. 120– 126. http://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13817
12. Garrett B.L., Neufeld P.J. Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful Convictions. Virginia Law Review. 2009. Vol. 95. No. 1. P. 1–97.
13. Meterko V. Strengths and Limitations of Forensic Science: What DNA Exonerations Have Taught Us and Where to Go from Here. West Virginia Law Review. 2016. Vol. 119. P. 639–649.
14. Cooper G.S., Meterko V. Cognitive Bias Research in Forensic Science: A Systematic Review. Forensic Science International. 2019. Vol. 297. P. 35–46. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016
Review
For citations:
Asnis A.Ya., Khaziev Sh.N. International Forensic Cooperation and Advocacy. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019;14(4):43-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-4-43-54