Preview

Theory and Practice of Forensic Science

Advanced search

The Problem of Detecting Incitement in Extremist Content (Using Examples from the Internet)

https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-3-34-39

Abstract

The article considers the characteristics of targeting when identifying the signs of incitement in extremist materials: in texts, commentaries to articles, videos, audios etc. on the Internet. The methods of linguistic analysis (lexical-semantic, stylistic analysis, semantic analysis, communicative-pragmatic analysis) were used in the study. As a result, the following forms of targeting expression in the aspect of linguistic signs of incitement were identified: 1) an appeal to a specific interlocutor (to a specific person, group of persons); 2) through the components of the communicative situation in general (focus on the mass, public addressee and even on the self which is transformed into a focus on the own group). Complicated cases of the implementation of the targeting category in texts with a pronounced or hidden language game are noted. The definition of the targeting category is shown to be an important component when identifying the linguistic signs of the “incitement” meaning, the speech (text) purpose depends on it. Targeting is closely related to the types of incitement: direct/indirect, explicit/implicit. To identify the linguistic features of the “incitement” meaning it is necessary to conduct a multidimensional analysis considering the general communicative situation, the category of targeting and its implementation in the statement.

About the Author

T. V. Berdnikova
The Saratov Laboratory of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Berdnikova Tat’yana Vladimirovna – Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Expertise and Expert Studies in Cases Related to the Manifestation of Extremism


References

1. Kukushkina O.V., Safonova Yu.A., Sekerazh T.N. Method of Conducting Complex Forensic Psychological and Linguistic Examination in the Cases of Counteraction to Extremism and Terrorism. Moscow: RFCFS, 2014. 98 p. (In Russ.)

2. Shevchenko I. Some psychological features of communication via the Internet. Flogiston. 27.05.2007. (In Russ.). http://flogiston.ru/articles/netpsy/shevchenko/

3. Arutunova N.D. The recipient factor. The Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language. 1981. Vol. 40. No. 4. P. 356–367. (In Russ.)

4. Lotman Yu.M. Autocommunication: “I” and “Other” as addressees (on the two communication models in the system of culture). In: Lotman Yu.M. Universe of the mind. Saint Petersburg: Isskustvo-SPb, 2000. P. 159–165. (In Russ.)

5. Goldin V.E. Address: theoretical issues. Saratov: Saratov University 1987. 127 p. (In Russ.)

6. Shuy R.W. The Language of Defamation Cases. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. 258 p.


Review

For citations:


Berdnikova T.V. The Problem of Detecting Incitement in Extremist Content (Using Examples from the Internet). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019;14(3):34-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-3-34-39

Views: 1045


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1819-2785 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7275 (Online)