Forms of Expert Knowledge Application in Land Disputes Settlement
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-3-26-33
Abstract
When considering land disputes, a court examines a large amount of evidence. In this forensic land survey expertise has taken a special place since its findings often form the basis of the court decision. The correct and prompt consideration of the dispute depends on the quality work of an expert.
The paper reviews a range of problems emerging when appointing a land survey expertise, preparing materials for the forensic examination, assessing forensic expert opinions and other evidence by the court. Inter alia, it is essential to correctly determine the type of examination, the list of necessary documents to conduct it, to estimate the duration of the study. The author reveals the possibilities of expansion of a specialist’s advisory activities at the expertise appointment stage to reduce the time of its conduct.
About the Author
O. V. Zhukova
Istra Town Court of Moscow region
Russian Federation
Zhukova Oksana Viktorovna – Federal Judge
Russian Federation
Zhukova Oksana Viktorovna – Federal Judge
References
1. Orlov Yu.K. Contemporary issues of proof and use of special knowledge in criminal proceedings. Handbook. Moscow: Prospect, 2016. 213 p. (In Russ.)
2. Orlov Yu.K. Forensic science as a means of proof in criminal proceedings. Moscow: RFCFS, 2005. (In Russ.)
3. Rossinskaya E.R. On the issue of improvement and unification of legal regulation of forensic expertise. In: Theoretical and applied aspects of the use of special knowledge in criminal and civil proceedings. Scientific and practical handbook / E.F. Moiseeva (ed.). Moscow: RAP, 2013. P. 22–31. (In Russ.)
4. Orlov Yu.K. Specialist is a knowledgeable person not interested in the outcome of a case. Russian Justitia. 2003. No. 4. P. 36–37. (In Russ.)
5. Bonner A.T. Conventional and non-conventional means of proof in civil and arbitration proceedings. Moscow: Prospekt, 2013. 611 p. (In Russ.)
6. Zinin A.M. Participation of a specialist in proceedings. Textbook. Moscow: Prospect, 2014. 254 p. (In Russ.)
7. Zinin A.M., Semikolenova A.I., Ivanova E.V. Participation of a specialist in proceedings. Textbook. Moscow: Prospect, 2016. 288 p. (In Russ.)
8. Tarasov A.A. Expert and specialist in criminal proceedings in Russia. Monograph. 2nd ed. Moscow: Prospect, 2017. 125 p. (In Russ.)
9. Bonner A.T. Specialist in civil and arbitration proceedings: legislative regulation and judicial practice. Law. 2010. No. 6. P. 115–128. (In Russ.)
10. Dyakonova O.G. Regulation of Institutions of Judicial Examination and Expert Participation in Legal Proceedings as Viewed by Practitioners (by Results of the Lawyers Questioning). Advocate’s Practice. 2016. No. 2. P. 16–22. (In Russ.)
11. Zhdanov S.P. The role of forensic specialists as experts for the defense. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2015. No. 4 (40). P. 38–44. (In Russ.)
12. Zinin A.M. The specialist opinion: the essence, content and form. Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). 2016. No. 8 (24). P. 32–37. (In Russ.)
13. Butyrin A.U., Stativa E.B. Сonsultative activity of a specialist as a means of increasing the efficiency of the production of judicial construction technical expertise. On the issues of expert practice. 2017. No. 51. P. 297–302. (In Russ.)
14. Rossinskaya E.R. Forensic science in civil, arbitration, administrative and criminal proceedings. Monograph. 3rd ed. Moscow: Norma, Infra-M, 2014. 735 p. (In Russ.)
15. Rossinskaya E.R. Galyashina E.I., Zinin A.M. Theory of forensic science (forensic expertology) / E.R. Rossinskaya (ed.). Moscow: Norma, Infra-M, 2016. 368 p. (In Russ.)
16. Zaitseva E.A. The concept of development of the institute of forensic expertise under adversarial criminal proceedings. Monograph. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2010. 424 p. (In Russ.)
17. Aver’yanova T.V. Forensic science: the course of general theory. Moscow: Norma, 2006. 480 p. (In Russ.)
18. Shlyakhov A.R. Procedural and organizational framework of forensic expertise. Moscow: VNIISE, 1972. 119 p. (In Russ.)
19. Vajda A. Modernising the courts, land registers and cadaster. Croatian International Relations Review. 2001. Vol. 7. No. 22/23. P. 27–30.
20. Roşu D.C., Ciolac V., Colţan O.N. Some aspects of cadastral documentation necessary registration agricultural land in land book. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology. 2012. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 231–233.
21. Zhang H., Tang C. A Performance Assessment Model for Cadastral Survey System Evaluation. In: Yomralioglu T., McLaughlin J. (eds). Cadastre: Geo-Information Innovations in Land Administration. Springer, Cham, 2017. P. 33– 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51216-7_4
22. Mehrasa J., Kainiya M. A Platform for Development and Optimum Use of Land Capacity. Journal of Politic and Law. 2017. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 230–240. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v10n2p230
23. Ting L, Williamson I.P. Cadastral trends: A synthesis. Australian Surveyor. 1999. Vol. 44. No. 1. P. 46–54. http://doi.org/10.1080/00050326.1999.10441903
24. Bogaerts T., Zevenbergen J. Cadastral systems – alternatives. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2001. Vol. 25. No. 4–5. P. 325–337. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0198-9715(00)00051-x
25. Selivanov N.A. Controversial issues in forensic sciences. Socialist legality = Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost’. 1978. No. 5. P. 65–69. (In Russ.)
26. Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I. A judge’s desk book: forensic expertise. Moscow: Prospect, 2010. 464 p. (In Russ.)
27. Arsen’ev V.D., Orlov Yu.K. The issues of legal regulation of expertise in criminal procedure and civil legislation of the USSR and Union republics. The works of VNIISE. 1973. Issue 5. P. 84–129. (In Russ.)
28.
Review
For citations:
Zhukova O.V. Forms of Expert Knowledge Application in Land Disputes Settlement. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019;14(3):26-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-3-26-33
Views:
1162
Email this article 