Preview

Theory and Practice of Forensic Science

Advanced search

The Features of Market Value Assessment of the Objects of Intellectual Property When Conducting Forensic Expertise

https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-2-128-135

Abstract

Illicit use of intellectual property violates the rights of the person/company that owns it. The expertise of intellectual property in many ways helps to restore justice in cases of rights violation. To conduct such expertise the knowledge of not only the intellectual property rights is required, but also of the activity to which the disputed intellectual property belongs. The article discusses some approaches to assessment of the market value of intellectual property, for instance it is assumed that when calculating the discount rate of intellectual property (for example, a brand), a company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) can be used. A hypothesis is substantiated that the methodology for determining discount rates using the “traditional” approach, when the discount rate takes all risks into account and is applied to the most probable values of the income measure, is based on the direct observations on the capital value market for a business. It is noted that the discount rate for intangible assets not necessarily should differ from that for a business. Thus, WACC assessment method is a discount rate for the invested capital. The method of estimating the discount rate based on WACC, shows the rate of return to be paid for the use of investment capital. The latter may consist of two sources of financing: own capital and debt capital. The article provides a thorough and detailed analysis of the WACC and notes that it can be used in both financial and investment analysis to assess future returns on investments, considering the initial conditions for profitability of investment capital.

About the Author

K. H. Mamikonyan
National Bureau of Expertise of the Republic of Armenia
Armenia

Mamikonyan Karen Hovhannes – Ph.D. in Economics, Associate Professor, Head of the Department for Coordination of Scientific Research and Technical Testing, Expert of the Department of Economic and Accountant Expertise

 Yerevan 0004



References

1. Rybkina M.V. On the protection of intellectual property in the Russian Federation. The world of economics and law = Mir ekonomiki i prava. 2015. No. 4. P. 52–58. (In Russ.)

2. Reilly R.F., Schweihs R.P. Guide to Intangible Asset Valuation. 2nd Revised Edition. New York: Wiley, 2016. 784 p.

3. Nielsen J.M. Guidance for Applying the Relief from Royalty Method to Value Trademarks and Trade Names. Insights. 2018. P. 52–58. http://www.willamette.com/insights_journal/18/summer_2018_5.pdf

4. Leont’ev B.B., Mamadzhanov Kh.A. Principles and approaches to the assessment of intellectual property and intangible assets. Textbook. Moscow: Rinfo, 2003. 270 p. (In Russ.)

5. Bulgarelli F. Methods of Brand Valuation: A case study on Alibaba. com. 2015. http://www.vernimmen.com/ftp/Francesca_Bulgarelli_Master_Thesis.pdf

6. Dorofeev A.Yu, Filatov V.V., Medvedev V.M, Fadeev A.S., Shestov A.V. Dadugin M.V. The methodology for the valuation of intangible assets. Internet-journal “Naukovedenie”. 2015. Vol. 7. No. 1. http://doi.org/10.15862/95EVN115

7. Mamikonyan K.O. The approaches to appraise company’s market value by discounting future cash flows when conducting financial and economic expertise. Problems and issues of contemporary science. Trends of science and education development. December 2018. No. 1(1). Part 4. Samara: NITs MOAN, 2018. P. 22–29. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.18411/pivsn-58


Review

For citations:


Mamikonyan K.H. The Features of Market Value Assessment of the Objects of Intellectual Property When Conducting Forensic Expertise. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019;14(2):128-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-2-128-135

Views: 1350


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1819-2785 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7275 (Online)