The Activity of the Chief Executive of a Forensic Organization in the Light of International Standards for Conformity Assessment Requirements
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-2-100-106
Abstract
The issues are considered concerning the standardization of forensic activities legal regulation enabling to create an effective transition mechanism to move to a new forensic technological level in our country. The need to implement the international regulations to the national legal system to standardise this activity is highlighted. In forensic activity, it is necessary to apply the new standards for conformity assessment of such principles as the of impartiality and confidentiality. The definitions of these principles are analysed, the conformity assessment requirements for persons involved in conducting forensic investigations are elucidated. The activity of the chief executive of a forensic organization is analysed in the conditions of application the international conformity assessment standards for the mentioned principles as well as his function in managing the institution and personnel.
About the Author
O. A. Surovaya
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Surovaya Olesya Aleksandrovna – Сhief specialist
Moscow 109028
References
1. Moiseeva T.F. Standardization of forensic expertise to eliminate some procedural and methodological problems of its implementation. Classification issues of forensic examinations, certification and validation of methodological support, standardisation of forensic activity. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Moscow, 21 January 2016). Moscow: Prospect, 2016. P. 193– 196. (In Russ.)
2. Zinin A.M., Mailis N.P. Forensic Sciences: Textbook. Moscow: Yurait: Pravo i zakon, 2002. 318 p. (In Russ.)
3. Smirnova S.A., Zamaraeva N.A. Opportunities for Technical Regulation of Forensic Science Services in the Russian Federation. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2015. No. 1 (37). P. 46–50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2015-1-46-50
4. Moiseeva T.F. Standardization of forensic expertise to eliminate some procedural and methodological problems of its implementation. Classification issues of forensic examinations, certification and validation of methodological support, standardisation of forensic activity. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Moscow, 21 January 2016). Moscow: Prospect, 2016. P. 193– 196. (In Russ.)
5. Wilson-Wilde L. The international development of forensic science standards – A review. Forensic Science International. 2018. Vol. 288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.009
6. Smirnova S.А., Omelyanyuk G.G., Usov A.I. Current Problems of Codification of Innovations in Forensic Practice in the Russian Federation. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016. No. 1 (41). P. 26–35. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2016-1-26-35
7. Smirnova S.A., Zamaraeva N.A. Opportunities for Technical Regulation of Forensic Science Services in the Russian Federation. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2015. No. 1 (37). P. 46–50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2015-1-46-50
8. Wilson-Wilde L. The international development of forensic science standards – A review. Forensic Science International. 2018. Vol. 288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.009
9. O’Brien É., Nic Daeid N., Black S. Science in the court: pitfalls, challenges and solutions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2015. Vol. 370. Issue 1674. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0062
10. Smirnova S.A. Challenges of the time and expert law enforcement technologies. Multimodal edition ‘Forensic science: reboot’. Part 1. Moscow: EKOM, 2012. 656 p. (In Russ.)
11. Smirnova S.А., Omelyanyuk G.G., Usov A.I. Current Problems of Codification of Innovations in Forensic Practice in the Russian Federation. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016. No. 1 (41). P. 26–35. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2016-1-26-35
12. O’Brien É., Nic Daeid N., Black S. Science in the court: pitfalls, challenges and solutions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2015. Vol. 370. Issue 1674. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0062
13. Miklyaeva O.V. Forensic Sciences Code of Ethics and Conduct: A Mere Formality or Imperative of the Modern Society. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No. 2 (34). P. 152–155. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2014-2-152-155
14. Smirnova S.A. Challenges of the time and expert law enforcement technologies. Multimodal edition ‘Forensic science: reboot’. Part 1. Moscow: EKOM, 2012. 656 p. (In Russ.)
15. Boldyrev I.V. ISO / IEC 17025: 2017: Practical recommendations on application. St. Petersburg: Professiya, 2018. 128 p. (In Russ.)
16. Miklyaeva O.V. Forensic Sciences Code of Ethics and Conduct: A Mere Formality or Imperative of the Modern Society. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No. 2 (34). P. 152–155. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2014-2-152-155
17. Boldyrev I.V. ISO / IEC 17025: 2017: Practical recommendations on application. St. Petersburg: Professiya, 2018. 128 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Surovaya O.A. The Activity of the Chief Executive of a Forensic Organization in the Light of International Standards for Conformity Assessment Requirements. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019;14(2):100-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-2-100-106
Views:
837
Email this article 