Validation of Forensic Expert’s Opinion in Investigation of Safety Rules Violations in Construction Works

The article aims to review the pressing issues of expert’s opinion validation in criminal cases related to investigation of safety rules violations in construction work and to find ways to resolve them. The following assessment criteria are addressed in the paper: expert’s qualification and competence, correctness of an expert’s opinion drafting, thoroughness and scientific validation of a research, coherence and correlation between findings and research part of an expert’s opinion, cogency of an opinion to an investigator (court) and other parties to the proceedings. Based on the expert practice analysis typical examples of problem situations related to validation of this type of expert’s opinions are given as well as the ways to resolve them are suggested and justified. The information presented may be of practical interest when preparing an evaluative judgement on an expert’s opinion on the category of cases in question.

evidence, validity, expert’s opinion, safety rules violation in construction works, accident, construction forensics, crime scene examination, labor protection, evaluation, occupational safety

1. Butyrin A.Yu. Construction forensics in incidents and accidents investigations. Monograph. Moscow: RFCFS, 2003. 320 p. (In Russ.)

2. Ovsyannikov I.V. The issue of evidence validity in the Russian law of evidence. Modern law. 2004. No. 7. P. 35–41. (In Russ.)

3. Alleaume P., Bodin O., Jarrault M., Klein B. Expertise Construction: Responsabilités, Dommages Ouvrage, Expertise et Rapports. Paris: Le Moniteur, 2013, 358 p. (In French).

4. Carpenter J. Release of data following a serious incident in the UK construction industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Forensic Engineering. 2015. Vol. 168. Issue 3. P. 140–147 https://doi.org/10.1680/feng.14.00009

5. Reese Ch.D. Accident/Incident Prevention Techniques. 2nd ed. 624 p.Florida: CRC Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11390

6. Zhipeng Zh., Goh Y.M., Li Q. Overview and analysis of safety management studies in the construction industry. Safety Science. 2015. Vol. 72. P. 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.10.006

7. Bushuev V.V. Expert errors: causes and prevention. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of internal Affairs of Russia. 2015. No. 3. P. 23–26. (In Russ.)

8. Butyrin A.Yu. Theory and practice of construction forensics. Moscow: Gorodets, 2006. 224 p. (In Russ.)

9. Bunge M. Causality and Modern Science. 3rd ed. New York: Dover Publications, 2011. 448 p.

10. Pearl J. Causality: models, reasoning and conclusions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Vol. 19. Issue 4. 386 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466603004109

11. Ali A.S., Kamaruzzaman S.N., Sing G.S. A Study on Causes Of Accident and Prevention In Malaysian Construction Industry. Journal of Design + Built. 2010. Vol. 3. P. 95–104.

12. López M.A.C., Ritzel D.O., Fontaneda I., Alcantara O.J.G. Construction industry accidents in Spain. Journal of Safety Research. 2008. Vol. 39. Issue 5. P. 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2008.07.006