The Application of Public Data in Forensic Real Estate Valuations: Problems, Limitations, Opportunities
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-1-24-29
Abstract
One of the problems with the practice of legal proceedings is the determination of the legal authority limits of a forensic expert when he forms an array of initial data, the structure and content of which would provide a full and comprehensive research of the issues put before him by the body (person) having appointed the examination. The possibility of the specifed initial data completeness ensuring is suggested and substantiated in the article, arguments arising from the provisions of the law concerning neutralization of the traditional criticism directions of the expert in this part during his interrogation in the course of judicial proceedings on his conclusion are adduced.
About the Authors
A. Yu. ButyrinRussian Federation
Butyrin Andrei Yur’evich – Doctor of Law (habilitated degree), Head of the Laboratory of Construction Forensics of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice, Professor at the Department of Construction and Property Management, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
Moscow 109028, Moscow 129337
V. M. Kruglyakova
Russian Federation
Kruglyakova Victoria Markovna – Doctor of Economics (habilitated degree), Professor at the Department of Technology, Organization of Construction, Expertise and Property Management of Voronezh State Technical University, Managing Director of the Limited Liability Company ‘FinancialConsulting’
Voronezh 394026, Voronezh 394036
I. A. Shipilova
Russian Federation
Shipilova Irina Alekseevna – Candidate of Law, Head of the Department of Construction and Engineering Forensics of Voronezh Regional Centre of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Technology, Organization of Construction, Expertise and Property Management of Voronezh State Technical University
Voronezh 394026, Voronezh 394006
References
1. Kruglyakova V.M., Chesnokova E.A. Feasibility of the Cadastre Value of the Real Estate as the Intrusion of Increasing the Economic Efficiency of Industrial Branched Objects. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii, Seriya Teknologiya Tekstil’noi Promyshlennosti. 2017. No. 5 (371). P. 32–36. (In Russ.)
2. Butyrin A.Yu., Kulakov K.Yu. Initial data for the forensic evaluation research. Theory and practice of Forensic Science. 2011. No. 3 (23). P. 34–41. (In Russ.)
3. Orlov Yu.K. Expert opinion and its assessment in criminal cases. Study guide. Moscow: Yurist, 1995. 64 p. (In Russ.)
4. Kostenko R.V., Nemira S.V. The credibility of expert opinion in criminal proceedings: a monograph. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2018. 147 p. (In Russ.)
5. Gerasimenko V.V., Dolin A.N., Shipilova I.A. The solution of expert issues on the market value determination of construction objects and functionally related to them land plots. Method. recommendations for experts. In: Butyrin A.Yu. (ed.). Methodological recommendations for conducting value and transformation research during forensic construction and technical expertise. Moscow: RFCFS, 2016. P. 7–264. (In Russ.)
6. Korukhov Yu.G., Orlov Yu.K., Orlova V.F. (eds.) Commentary on the Federal Law ‘On State Forensic Expert Activities in the Russian Federation’. Moscow: TK Velbi, 2002. 192 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Butyrin A.Yu., Kruglyakova V.M., Shipilova I.A. The Application of Public Data in Forensic Real Estate Valuations: Problems, Limitations, Opportunities. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019;14(1):24-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-1-24-29