Systematization of Intellectual Property Objects for Forensic Purposes
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-1-6-12
Abstract
Correlation of the concepts of the object of forensic intellectual property investigation and the object of intellectual property is contemplated. The attributes of these objects are analyzed, in particular the intangible nature of intellectual property objects and the tangible character of the objects of forensic intellectual property investigation. A distinction is made between the concepts of ‘intellectual property’, ‘industrial property’ and ‘intangible assets’. The proposed systematization of intellectual property objects for forensic purposes is based on current practices in court ordered forensic intellectual property investigations. The case is made for setting up a new species of forensic investigation in the system of the Russian Ministry of Justice, as well as four new forensic science specialties: (1) investigation of items covered by copyright and related rights, (2) investigation of objects of patent rights and unconventional objects, (3) investigation of brand identities, (4) valuation of intellectual property objects.
About the Authors
G. G. Omel’yanyukRussian Federation
Omel’yanyuk Georgii Georgievich – Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Deputy Director of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice; Professor of the Department of Forensic Examination Activities, RUDN University
Moscow 109028, Moscow 117198
V. V. Gulevskaya
Russian Federation
Gulevskaya Viktoriya Vladimirovna – Candidate of Law, Deputy Head of the Department of Innovations in the Practice of Forensic Science of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice; Associate Professor of the Law, Intellectual Property and Forensic Science Department of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Moscow 109028, Moscow 105055
A. S. Savenko
Russian Federation
Savenko Anton Sergeevich – Patent Engineer, Research Assistant at the Department of Innovations in the Practice of Forensic Science of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice; Graduate Research Student of the Department of Forensic Examination Activities, RUDN University
Moscow 109028, Moscow 117198
References
1. Savenko A.S. Creative activity in Russia and abroad in the dynamics. Quality. Innovation. Education. 2017. No. 8. P. 28–35. (In Russ.)
2. Smirnova S.A., Gulevskaya V.V., Omel’yanyuk G.G. Forensic Intellectual Property Investigations: A New Area of Forensic Practice in the System of the Russian Ministry of Justice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 16–26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-2-16-26
3. Dmitrieva K.S. Problems in conducting expertises in the sphere of intellectual property. Forensic examination of Belarus. 2018. No. 2 (7). P. 28–32. (In Russ.)
4. Kondakov N.I. A dictionary of logic. Moscow: Nauka, 1971. 656 p. (In Russ.)
5. Shlyakhov A.R. Writings on forensic science. Moscow: Nauka, 2006. 567 p. (In Russ.)
6. Aver’yanova T.V. Forensic science: a general theory course. Moscow: Norma, 2009. 480 p. (In Russ.)
7. Orlov Yu.K. The use of specialized knowledge in the criminal process: a study guide. Issue 2. Forensic science: general concepts. Moscow: MGYuA, 2004. 23 p. (In Russ.)
8. BelkinR.S.Encyclopedia of criminalistics.2nd ed. Moscow: Megatron XXI, 2000. 334p. (In Russ.)
9. Belkin R.S. Criminalistics course. Special theories of criminalistics. In three volumes. Vol. 2. Moscow: Yurist’’, 1997. 464 p. (In Russ.)
10. Semikalenova A.I. The Problem of Defining the Objects of Forensic Software Analysis and Its Solution via R.S. Belkin’s Reflection Theory. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 40–44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-3-40-44
11. Krainev P. Forensic investigation of intellectual rights. Legal practice. The newspaper of Ukrainian lawyers. No. 51 (365) dated on 19.02.2004. (In Russ.). http://pravo.ua/article.php?id=10004143
Review
For citations:
Omel’yanyuk G.G., Gulevskaya V.V., Savenko A.S. Systematization of Intellectual Property Objects for Forensic Purposes. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019;14(1):6-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-1-6-12