Preview

Theory and Practice of Forensic Science

Advanced search

Some Discussion Issues in Environmental Forensics

https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-2-112-118

Abstract

Environmental forensic investigations are increasingly being used to address diagnostic and situational objectives in the criminal, as well as civil, administrative, and arbitration process. Although they offer no identification solutions, the findings of such investigations can nevertheless be quite valuable. Assessment of replacement costs in cases involving damage to environmental compartments is of particular pertinence. In the long term this field of inquiry can be expanded by integrating the mechanism of ecosystem service accounting into forensic analysis. The relevance of environmental forensic services, their evolution and optimization largely depend on the accuracy of designations selected for different categories of forensic investigation. For example, it seems plausible that investigation of waste disposal facilities should be approached as a separate field of inquiry. At the same time, it makes sense to organize the training of specialists across several related forensic disciplines at once, rather than keep it limited to narrow fields of study.

About the Author

Elena I. Maiorova
Mytishchi Branch of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University.
Russian Federation

Maiorova Elena Ivanovna - Doctor of Law, Professor, head of subdivision at the Law, Intellectual Property and Forensics Department, Bauman Moscow State Technical University.

Mytishchi.



References

1. Shlyakhov A.R. Classification of forensic examinations: manual. Volgograd: VSSh MVD SSSR, 1980. 72 p. (In Russ.).

2. VinbergA.I. Pressing problems of thetheory and practice of forensic examination. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo = Soviet state and right. 1961. No 6. P. 76-82. (In Russ.).

3. ZininA.M., MaWisN.P. Forensic examination: textbook. Moscow: Pravo i zakon; Yurait- Izdat, 2002. 320 p. (In Russ.).

4. Dedyu I.I. Ecological encyclopedic dictionary. Chisinau: Soviet Encyclopedia, 1990. 406 c. (In Russ.).

5. Smirnova S.A. Complexification in russia’s legal: education classical approach and innovations. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016. No 2 (42). P. IQ- 13. (In Russ.).

6. Mayorova Е., Goncharuk N., Adamova E. Interaction between environmental forensic expert witness and court during criminal proceedings. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No 4 (36). P. 34- 40. (In Russ.).

7. ОГ E.M., Shadrov M.A. The ration of legal categories “harm”, “damage” and “damages” in the environmental legislation. Leningradskii yuridicheskii zhurnal = Leningrad legal journal. 2016. No 3 (45). P. 84-191. (In Russ.).

8. Tsibulnikova M.R. Mainstreaming natural capital and ecosystem services into management decisions. Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. No 360. P. 193- 199. (In Russ.).

9. Fomenko G.A., Fomenko M.A., Loshad- kin K.A., Mikhailova A.V. Monetary assessment of natural resources, objects and ecosystem sen/ices in management of preservation of a biodiversity: experience of regional works: a grant for experts experts. Yaroslavl: Kadastr, 2002. XIV. 65 p. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Maiorova E.I. Some Discussion Issues in Environmental Forensics. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017;12(2):112-118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-2-112-118

Views: 857


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1819-2785 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7275 (Online)