Preview

Theory and Practice of Forensic Science

Advanced search

Modern Possibilities of Appointing and Conducting Forensic Religious Examination

https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2025-1-86-95

Abstract

The article discusses the possibilities of appointing and conducting a forensic religious examination using the example of detection and investigation of crimes under Article 148 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. It gives the analysis of judicial practice of charging with a criminal offense for such wrongdoing. The expediency of appointing and conducting a forensic religious examination or a complex psychological, linguistic and religious expert examination under investigation of crimes related to insulting the believers’ feelings is substantiated. The authors consider it advisable to contact representatives of confessions (clergymen who have completed an additional professional retraining program in this expert specialty) when appointing a forensic religious examination. In this case, the expert’s belonging to a certain religious group will indicate a high level of his special knowledge both theoretical and practical one. It is shown that the development of forensic religious examination on the basis of state forensic institutions, including involvement of representatives of religious denominations, can become a starting point for the development of scientific and methodological support for forensic religious examination.

About the Authors

I. A. Bakushkin
The Kolomna Diocese
Russian Federation

Bakushkin Ivan Anatolyevich – Chairman of the Department for Missionary Work and Youth Affairs 

Kolomna 140400



I. A. Lapina
Belarusian State University
Belarus

Lapina Irena Aleksandrovna – Candidate of Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Criminalistics Department

Minsk 220030



G. G. Omel’yanyuk
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science named after Professor A.R. Shlyakhov of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; Lomonosov Moscow State University; Bauman Moscow State Technical University (BMSTU), Moscow 105055
Russian Federation

Omel’yanyuk Georgii Georgievich – Doctor of Law, Professor, Academic Secretary of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice; Professor of the Lomonosov Moscow State University; Professor of the Security in the Digital World Department of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University

Moscow 101000, Moscow 119991, Moscow 105055



References

1. Kokorev V.G. The Comparative and Legal Analysis of Norms on Criminal Liability for the Act Made for Insult of Religious Feelings of Believers by the Legislation of Russia and Some Foreign Countries. Vestnik of Economic Security. 2020. No. 4. P. 73–78. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2414-3995-2020-10233

2. Kashchaeva M.V. Protection of the Feelings of Believers under the Paradigms of Russian Criminal and Administrative Legislation. Bulletin of the Barnaul Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2019. No. 1. P. 81–82. (In Russ.).

3. Kutcenko M.V. Youth Perception of Extremist Ideologies in the Educational Environment on the Example of the Southern Federal District and the North Caucasus Federal District: Analysis of the Results of a Social Survey. Review. NCPTI. 2020. No. 2 (21). P. 47–56. (In Russ.).

4. Doronina S.V., Kashchaeva M.V., Trubnikova Yu.V. “Insulting Religious Feelings”: Everyday Consciousness and Law Enforcement. Legal Linguistics. 2022. No. 24 (35). P. 45–52. (In Russ.).

5. Lapina I.A. Reflection of Scientific Knowledge Patterns in the Development of Forensic Activities. Relevant Issues of Using Special Knowledge in Criminal, Civil and Arbitration Processes and in Administrative Offense Cases: Proceedings of the XIII International Scientific and Practical Conference (Ufa, October 25, 2024). Ufa: Nauchno-issledovatel’skii institut problem pravovogo gosudarstva, 2024. P. 128–133. (In Russ.).

6. Denisov Yu.D., Lapina I.A., Omel’yanyuk G.G., Khaziev Sh.N. Traditional Approaches and Innovations in Forensic Activities. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2023. No. 18 (2). P. 78–88. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2023-2-78-88

7. Usov A.I., Omel’yanyuk G.G., Khaziev Sh.N., Galaeva O.V., Gulevskaya V.V. Forensic Ethics Examination as a New Direction of Forensic Expert Activity of the Russian Ministry of Justice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2023. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 6–15. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2023-3-6-15

8. Galaeva O.V., Gulevskaya V.V., Omel’yanyuk G.G. Forensic Political Expertise: An Innovative Direction of Forensic Practice in the System of the Russian Ministry of Justice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2023. Vol. 18. No 1. P. 30–43. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2023-1-30-43

9. Bozhenova A.A., Erakhmilevich V.V. Issues of Classifying Acts of Religious Feelings Defamation. Legal Linguistics. 2023. No. 28 (39). P. 105–110. (In Russ.)

10. Bakushkin I.A., Ilicheva I.M. The Problem of Determining Value Orientations in Modern Psychology. Vestnik Universiteta. 2024. No. 2. P. 228–234. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-2-228-234

11. Reva G.V., Tsergoy T.A. Concept of the Notion of Insulting Religious Feelings in the Social Space of Modernity. Bulletin of the Maikop State Technological University. 2017. No. 4. P. 95–100. (In Russ.).

12. Zinchenko V.P., Meshcheryakov B.G. Large Psychological Dictionary. Moscow: Yurait, 2003. 672 p. (In Russ.).

13. Ugrinovich D.M. Psychology of Religion. Moscow: Politizdat, 1986. 352 p. (In Russ.).

14. Ivanova E.V., Lejkand E.V., Pavin D.V., Kuzneczova O.V., Farkhitdinova O.M., Chernyshova Z.E. Forensic Religious Examination: Textbook for University Students Studying in the Field of 47.03.03, 47.04.03 “Religious Studies” Ekaterinburg: Ural’skii federal’nyi universitet imeni pervogo Prezidenta Rossii B.N. El’tsina, 2024. 168 p. (In Russ.).

15. Kirushin K.R. Rights to Freedom of Conscience and Religion in Forensic Theological Examination in the Investigation of these Crimes. Bulletin of the Kazan Law Institute of MIA of Russia. 2024. Vol.15. No. 1 (55). P. 86–93. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37973/KUI.2024.44.75.018

16. Musina D.R. Features of Assigning and Conducting of Forensic Religious Expertise in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Forensic Examination of Belarus. 2018. No. 1(6). P. 21–25. (In Russ.).

17. Kirushin K.R. The Mechanism of Legal Regulation of Judicial Religious Examination in the Russian Federation and the CIS Countries (Republic of Kazakhstan, Republic of Uzbekistan, Republic of Kyrgyzstan): Comparative Legal Approach. Lawyer-Jurist. 2024. No. 1(108). P. 129–134. (In Russ.).

18. Aripova Z. Urta asr misr khotin- izlarining izhtimoii aeti. Sharq ma’shali. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 2. P. 84–94. (In Yakut.).


Review

For citations:


Bakushkin I.A., Lapina I.A., Omel’yanyuk G.G. Modern Possibilities of Appointing and Conducting Forensic Religious Examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2025;20(1):86-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2025-1-86-95

Views: 192


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1819-2785 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7275 (Online)