On Formation of Private Theory of Forensic Activities Management
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2025-2-82-91
Abstract
In recent times, the subject of scientific research is increasingly becoming the improvement of the quality of forensic activities (FA), proper and effective management of it, as an ill-considered approach to FA organization can lead to negative consequences. The author identifies the FA organizational basis as part of forensic expertology, analyzes the relationship between management theory and forensic expertology and defines the FA specifics as an object of management. Considering the main modern doctrinal developments and highlighting aspects that significantly influence the FA genesis, the author comes to the conclusion on the actual formation of the FA management private theory. The article proposes the main elements of the FA management theory. In particular, it gives definitions of its subject and object and outlines an approximate structure of the management theory.
About the Author
O. G. Dyakonova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D’yakonova Oksana Gennadievna – Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Professor of Forensic Examination Department
Moscow 125993
References
1. Segai M.Ya. Forensic Expert Science: Object, Subject, Nature and System of Science. Theory and Practice of Forensics and Criminalistics. Vol. 3. Harkiv: Pravo, 2003. P. 25. (In Ukrainian.).
2. Shakirov K.N. Forensic Examination: Issues of Theory and Practice. Almaty: Arkaim, 2002. 288 p. (In Russ.).
3. Averyanova T. V. Forensic Examination: a Course of General Theory. Moscow: Norma, 2006. 480 p. (In Russ.).
4. Rossinskaya E.R. Modern Judicial Expertology – The Science of Forensics and Forensic Activities. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2015. No. 4 (40). P. 10–18. (In Russ.).
5. Bazhutin I.A., Bazhutina M.M. Fundamental Science “Management” as the Basis for Post-Industrial Development of Russia. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2017. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 94–102. (In Russ.).
6. Rozin V.M. Philosophy of Management: Main Directions, Subject, Essence of Management. In: Philosophy of Management: Problems and Strategies. Moscow: IFRAN, 2010. 347 p. (In Russ.).
7. Litvak B.G. Management Science. Theory and Practice. Moscow, 2011. 424 p. (In Russ.).
8. Smirnova S.A., Kuzmin S.A. R.S. Belkin and the Development of Views on Quality Management in Forensic Practice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 15–19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-3-15-19
9. Kuzmin S.A. Modern Models of Quality Management in Forensic Activities. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016. No. 3 (43). P. 18–27. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2016-3-18-27
10. Kuzmin S.A. Prospects for the Use the Concept of “Six Sigma” Quality Management in Forensic Activities: Pro Et Contra. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016. No. 3 (43). P. 28–32. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2016-3-28-32
11. Epstein V.A. The Role and Significance of Manager’s Activity in the Production of Forensic Examinations and Expert Research. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2023. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 52–59. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2023-3-52-59
12. Epstein V.A. Development of a Unified Integrated System of Forensic Activities in the Russian Federation: The Task Setting and the Ways to Solve it. Gaps in Russian Legislation. 2024. Vol. 17. No. 1. 2024. P. 168–173. (In Russ.).
13. Omelianyuk G.G., Usov A.I. Risk Management in Forensic Examination as a Way to Improve the Quality of Expert Production. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Development of Criminalistics and Forensic Examination in the Works of Professor E.R. Rossinskaya”. (Moscow, November 27, 2019). Moscow: Prospekt, 2019. P. 337–343. (In Russ.).
14. Smirnova S.A., Omelianyuk G.G., Usov A.I. Current Problems of Codification of Innovations in Forensic Practice in the Russian Federation. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016. No. 1 (41). P. 26–35. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2016-1-26-35
15. Usov A.I., Kuzmin S.A. Towards Standardization of Forensic Services across the Commonwealth of Independent States. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016. No. 4 (44). P. 26–30. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2016-4-26-30
16. Omelianyuk G.G. Implementing Innovative Mechanisms for Enhancing the Quality of Forensic Services via New Forensic Legislation. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No. 1 (33). P. 10–17. (In Russ.).
17. Zamaraeva N.A. Implementing a Quality Management System at the North-Western Regional Center of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No. 3 (35). P. 142–145. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Dyakonova O.G. On Formation of Private Theory of Forensic Activities Management. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2025;20(2):82-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2025-2-82-91
Views:
23
Email this article 