Expert Errors Made in the Study of Traditional and Digital Traces
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2024-1-20-24
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to identify expert errors in the production of traceological examinations to prevent them when conducting research on various objects. The author reviews the errors made by an investigator when appointing examinations, by an expert when conducting research. Various types of errors are distinguished: procedural, operational, technical and other errors related to the use of modern technologies. Special attention is paid to the errors in the study of digital traces.
About the Author
N. P. Maylis
V.Ya. Kikot Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maylis Nadezhda Pavlovna – Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Professor of the Department of Weapons Science and Traceology of the Educational and Scientific Complex of Forensic Examination,
Moscow.
References
1. Rossinskaya E.R. (Ed.). Forensic Examination: Typical Errors. Moscow: Prospect, 2012. 544 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Maylis N.P. Expert Errors Made in the Study of Traditional and Digital Traces. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2024;19(1):20-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2024-1-20-24
Views:
546
Email this article 