Topical Issues of Forensic Research of Firearms with Oval-Screw Drilling of the Bore “Lancaster” and Its Traces on the Bullets
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2023-3-95-103
Abstract
The article discusses the issues of developing the legal, scientific, and methodological foundations of the forensic investigation of firearms with oval-screw drilling of the Lancaster barrel bore. The author makes some proposals on how to bring the norms of the regulatory and technical regulations in the field of arms and ammunition trafficking in line with the modern concepts of rifled firearms. The mechanism of formation of traces of the barrel bore on the fired bullets is revealed. The author notes that the drilling of the Lancaster barrel bore determines the appearance of traces from its oval-screw profile in the form of two areas of abrasion along the small axis of the oval (traces of rifling lands) and two areas of less intense abrasion along the large axis of the oval (traces of rifling) on the bullets. The traces of the rifling lands and the traces of the rifling are fused with each other, and have a small angle of inclination (about 3° ).
The dependence of the display of traces of the barrel bore with the Lancaster drill on the fired bullets on the design of the bullets of the cal cartridges has been established. .366 TCM, 9.6x53 Lancaster. When using cartridges with FMJ shell bullets and SP “KION” semi-shell bullets, the traces of the barrel bore are displayed sufficiently well, which, in general, makes it possible to identify the weapon. Firing cartridges with an all-metal bullet made of zinc alloy “ECO” dramatically reduces the display of traces of the barrel bore on the fired bullets and complicates the firearms identification. The author proposes to ban shooting cartridges with lead bullets with a polymer antifriction shell “DERI” in firearms with a Lancaster channel drill, since when firing, the traces of the barrel bore on the fired bullet are not displayed. This contradicts the legislator’s requirement for civilian models of firearms on mandatory formation of traces suitable for identifying weapons on fired bullets.
About the Author
I. V. LatyshovRussian Federation
Latyshov Igor Vladimirovich – Doctor of Law, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Forensic Examinations and Research; Professor of the Higher School of Jurisprudence and Forensic Technical Expertise
Saint Petersburg 198206
Saint Petersburg 194064
References
1. Komarinets B.M. Methodology of Forensic Examination. Issue 3. Identification of Firearms by Fired Bullets. Moscow, 1961. 316 p. (In Russ.).
2. Ermolenko B.N. Identification of Rifled Firearms by Bullets. Kiev: Redaktsionno-izdatel’skii otdel MVD USSR, 1969. 56 p. (In Russ.).
3. Filippov V.V. Conditions of the Shot and Traces on the Bullets. Moscow: VNII MOOP SSSR, 1967. 45 p. (In Russ.).
4. Shevchenko B.I. Identification of Weapons by Bullet in Forensic Ballistics. Moscow: Moskovskii universitet, 1962. 47 p. (In Russ.).
5. Stashenko E.I. Identification of the Barrel of a Firearm by a Fired Bullet. Moscow: VNIISE MYu SSSR, 1973. 115 p. (In Russ.).
6. Kokin A.V. Theory and Methodological Foundations of the Study of Rifled Firearms by Traces on Bullets. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2010. 352 p. (In Russ.).
7. Latyshov I.V., Pakhomov M.E. Identification of Firearms by Toolmarks on Fired Bullets and Spent Cartridge Cases Exposed to Thermal Impact after the Firearm Discharge. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2015. No. 3 (39). P. 50–59. (In Russ.).
8. Kokin A.V. On the Issue of Determining the Model of Rifled Firearms by Traces on a Fired Bullet. Expert Practice. 2002. No. 53. P. 70–91. (In Russ.).
9. Kokin A.V. Trace-Perceiving Properties of Bullet Shells with Different Coatings. Forensic Examination. 2009. No. 1 (17). P. 49–56. (In Russ.).
10. Stalmakhov A.V., Sumaroka A.M., Egorov A.G., Sukharev A.G. Forensic Ballistics. Textbook / A.G. Egorov (ed.). Saratov: SYuI MVD Rossii, 1998. 176 p. (In Russ.).
11. Kokin A.V., Yarmak K.V. Forensic Ballistics and Forensic Ballistic Examination: Textbook. Moscow: Moskovskii universitet MVD Rossii imeni V.Ya. Kikotya 2018. 354 p. (In Russ.).
12. Dil’din Yu.M. Identification of Rifled Firearms by Traces on Fired Bullets. Typical Expert Methods of Investigation of Material Evidence. Part I. / Yu.M. Dil’din, V.V. Martynov (eds.). Moscow: EKTs MVD Rossii, 2010. P. 72–81. (In Russ.).
13. Degtyarev M. The Lancaster Era. Weapons of Calibers .366 TCM and 9.6/53 Lancaster. Kalashnikov. Gun Magazine. (In Russ.). https://www.kalashnikov.ru/era-lankastera/
14. Fedorenko V.A. Actual Problems of Forensic Ballistics. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2011. 208 p. (In Russ.).
15. Latyshov I.V. Individual Cases of Differential Diagnosis of Traces of the Bore of a Weapon on Fired Bullets in the Prevention of Expert Errors. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2015. No. 3. P. 41-44. (In Russ.).
16. Bardachenko A.N., Chulkov I.A. Small Firearms and Their Traces on Bullets, Cartridges and Barriers. Glock Pistols: Reference Manual. Volgograd: VA MVD RF, 2019. 147 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Latyshov I.V. Topical Issues of Forensic Research of Firearms with Oval-Screw Drilling of the Bore “Lancaster” and Its Traces on the Bullets. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2023;18(3):95–103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2023-3-95-103