Preview

Theory and Practice of Forensic Science

Advanced search

Problems of Assessing the Amount of Damage Caused to Soils by Pollution

https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-4-70-79

Abstract

The article addresses the issues arising in cost assessment of damage caused to soils, when applying the «Methodology for calculating the amount of damage caused to soils as an object of environmental protection» approved by the Order of the Ministry of Natural Resources of July 8, 2010 No. 238: 1) the practice of establishing the fact of pollution, according to which a number of chemical elements and compounds are considered as contaminants; 2) the use of the ambient content of elements and compounds in soils as a normative value, resulting in an unjustified overestimation of the degree of damage caused to soils; the use of the ambient content of substances concentration of which according to the results of laboratory analysis is expressed as “below the detection limit”; 3) the high role of the subjective factor, due to the possibility of interpreting the provisions of the current methodology, allowing subjective decisions in the performance of supervisory activities. Finally, the authors conclude that it is impossible to apply the Methodology for calculating the amount of damage caused to soils in forensic environmental examinations.
To increase the objectivity of the results it is necessary to develop a list of pollutants, considering the real harm that can be caused when their concentrations increase, and threshold concentrations of harmful substances below which they are not considered as pollutants.

About the Authors

M. V. Dabakhov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Dabakhov Maksim Vladimirovich – Doctor of Biology, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher of the Department of Land Resources and Soil Assessment, Faculty of Soil Science

119991, Moscow



E. V. Dabakhova
Institute of Additional Education, Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation

Dabakhova Elena Vladimirovna – Doctor of Agriculture, Professor, Director

127550, Moscow



References

1. Mikhaleva N.V. Improving the Methodological Support of Environmental Forensics. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2022. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 70–74. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-1-70-74

2. Omel’yanyuk G.G., Vakula M.A., Nikulina M.V. Problems of Cost Evaluation of Damage to Environmental Objects. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 46–53. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-3-46-53

3. Mikhaleva N.V., Golubeva S.G. Forensic Practices Related to Environmental Remediation Investigations. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 68–75. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-4-68-75

4. Maiorova E.I., Goncharuk N.U. Adamova E.V. Features of Interaction Between Environmental Experts and the Court in the Process of Criminal Proceedings. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No. 4 (36). Р. 34–40. (In Russ.).

5. Mikhaleva N.V. Expert Concepts in Forensic Ecology. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 124–129. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-1-124-129

6. Mikhaleva N.V. Forensic Environmental Examinations in Cases on Compensation for Harm (Damage) Caused by Environmental Violations: Analysis of Arbitration Courts’ Practice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 47–55. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-4-47-55

7. Kokin A.V. Bias in Forensic Examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 6–16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-4-6-16

8. Maiorova E.I., Goncharuk N.U. Environmental Harm: How to Determine its Size. Ecology of Production. 2018. No. 6. P. 16-23 (In Russ.).

9. Mikhaleva N.V. On the Tasks of Forensic Ecology. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 95–101. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2021-4-95-101

10. Orlov D.S. Soil Chemistry. Мoscow: MSU, 1985. 376 p. (In Russ.).

11. Mineev V.G. Agrochemistry. Textbook. 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. Moscow: MSU; Kolos. 2004. 720 p. (In Russ.).

12. Reimers N.F. Ecology: Theories, Laws, Rules, Principles and Hypotheses. Young Russia. 1994. 364 p. (In Russ.).

13. Titova V.I., Varlamova L.D., Dabakhova Е.V., Bakharev А.V. Study of Phosphorus Fertilizers and Phosphate State of Soils. Agrochemical Bulletin. 2011. No. 2. P. 3–6. (In Russ.).

14. Saet Y.E., Revich B.A., Yanin E.P. Geochemistry of the Environment. Moscow: Nedra. 1990. 335 p. (In Russ.).

15. Tepanosian G.О., Beliaeva О.А., Saakian Л.В., Sagatelian А.К. Integrated Approach in Determining the Background Contents of Chemical Elements in Soils. Geochemistry. 2017. No. 6. P. 563–570. (In Russ.).

16. Motuzova G.V. Soil-Chemical Environmental Monitoring. Moscow: MSU, 2001. 86 p. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Dabakhov M.V., Dabakhova E.V. Problems of Assessing the Amount of Damage Caused to Soils by Pollution. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2022;17(4):70-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-4-70-79

Views: 733


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1819-2785 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7275 (Online)